OnePlus Nord CE 2 Lite 5G vs Motorola Moto G Stylus 5G (2024) - Detailed Phone Comparison

Detailed Comparison

Specification

General

Launch Date April 30, 2022 May 30, 2024
Release Year 2022 2024

Physical

Volume 105.58 cm³ 100.95 cm³
Screen Size to Weight Ratio 3.38 "/g 3.53 "/g
Weight 195 g 190 g
Height 164.3 mm 162.6 mm
Width 75.6 mm 74.8 mm
Thickness 8.5 mm 8.3 mm
Foldable Design No No
Available Colors
  • Black Dusk
  • Blue Tide
  • Caramel Latte
  • Scarlet Wave

Display

Screen Size 6.59 " 6.7 "
Resolution 1080 x 2412 1080 x 2400
Aspect Ratio 20:9 20:9
Screen-to-Body Ratio 84.1 % 89.1 %
Pixel Density 401 PPI 395 PPI
Refresh Rate 120 Hz 120 Hz
Typical Brightness N/A N/A
HBM Brightness N/A N/A
Peak Brightness N/A 1200 nits

Hardware

Battery Capacity per Screen Area 115.13 mAh/in² 111.38 mAh/in²
Battery Density 47.36 mAh/cm³ 49.53 mAh/cm³
Battery Capacity 5000 mAh 5000 mAh
NFC Support Yes Yes
Chipset Qualcomm SM6375 Snapdragon 695 5G (6 nm) Qualcomm SM6450 Snapdragon 6 Gen 1 (4 nm)
CPU Octa-core (2x2.2 GHz Kryo 660 Gold & 6x1.7 GHz Kryo 660 Silver) Octa-core (4x2.2 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x1.8 GHz Cortex-A55)
GPU Adreno 619 Adreno 710

Connectivity

USB Version 2.0 2.0
OTG Support 1
DisplayPort
DisplayPort Version N/A N/A
USB Features USB Type-C 2.0, OTG USB Type-C 2.0

Software

Operating System Android Android
Initial OS Version 12 14
Maximum OS Version 13 15

Comparison Summary

Okay, let's dive deep into a practical comparison of the OnePlus Nord CE 2 Lite 5G and the Motorola Moto G Stylus 5G (2024). I'll break down the specs, highlight the key differences, and help you figure out which phone might be the better fit for you.

1. Specifications Breakdown

Here’s a detailed comparison table, focusing on how each spec translates into real-world usage:

FeatureOnePlus Nord CE 2 Lite 5GMotorola Moto G Stylus 5G (2024)Real-World Implications
Design
Dimensions164.3 × 75.6 × 8.5 mm162.6 × 74.8 × 8.3 mmOnePlus is slightly taller; Moto is a hair thinner & narrower.
Weight195g190gMoto G Stylus is a smidge lighter; likely noticeable during extended use
Display
Size6.59"6.7"Moto has a slightly larger screen; Better for immersive viewing, a little harder to hold one hand.
Resolution1080x24121080x2400Very similar clarity; Difference is negligible
PPI401395Essentially the same pixel density; equally crisp text and images
TechnologyIPS LCDP-OLEDMoto's P-OLED offers deeper blacks, better contrast, and vibrant colors.
Refresh Rate120Hz120HzBoth offer smooth scrolling and animations.
Brightness0 nits1200 nitsMoto is SIGNIFICANTLY brighter, much better for outdoor visibility.
Performance
ChipsetSnapdragon 695 5G (6nm)Snapdragon 6 Gen 1 (4nm)Moto's newer chip is faster & more efficient, leading to smoother performance and battery life.
Antutu Score406,221514,000Moto performs better, faster app loading, smoother operation.
GPUAdreno 619Adreno 710Moto will handle graphics-intensive tasks and games better.
Battery Life
Capacity5000mAh5000mAhExpected similar battery life in general use.
Charging33W fast charging30W fast chargingOnePlus charges a bit quicker from zero to 100%.
FeaturesNon-removableReverse, 15W wireless, Non-removableMoto offers the convenience of reverse and wireless charging; OnePlus is only wired.
Camera
Main Camera64MP, f/1.7, 1/2", 0.7µm50MP, f/1.8, 1/1.56", 1.0µmOnePlus has higher resolution; Moto's larger sensor & pixels gather more light for better low-light photos.
Selfie Camera16MP, f/2.032MP, f/2.45, 0.7µmMoto offers better selfies in terms of resolution and details.
Depth Camera2MP, f/2.4NoneOnePlus has a dedicated depth sensor for portraits; Moto handles this with software.
Macro Camera2MP, f/2.4NoneOnePlus has a dedicated Macro lens for very close-up pictures.
Wide Angle + MacroNone13MP, f/2.2, 1.12µmMotorola provides wide and macro in the same camera.
Video1080p@30fps4K@30fps, 1080p@60/120fpsMoto provides much more detail and smoother recording options; has better slo-mo.
FeaturesDigital zoom, Triple camera, Digital image stabilization, Autofocus, Touch focus, Contrast detection autofocus (CDAF), Continuous shooting, Geotagging, Panorama, HDR, Face detection, White balance settings, ISO settings, Exposure compensation, Scene mode, Self-timerTime-Lapse, 4K Video, Digital zoom, Dual camera, Digital image stabilization, Optical Stabilization (OIS), Autofocus, Touch focus, Continuous autofocus, Manual focus, Phase detection autofocus (PDAF), Continuous shooting, Geotagging, Panorama, HDR, Face detection, White balance settings, ISO settings, Exposure compensation, Scene mode, Self-timer, Dual capture, Night ModeMotorola's suite is superior due to OIS, 4k and more focus modes.
Software
OSAndroid 12 (up to 13)Android 14 (up to 15)Moto has a newer OS with a longer guaranteed support cycle
Connectivity
Wi-Fi802.11acWiFi 6E (802.11ax)Moto's Wi-Fi is faster and more stable, especially in crowded networks.
Bluetooth5.2 LE5.1 LEOnePlus has a slightly newer Bluetooth version, with the additional EDR & AAC codecs.
GPSStandardL1/L5, E1/E5a, NavICMoto has a better and more accurate GPS.
SIMDual Nano SIMDual Nano SIM + eSIMMoto offers the flexibility of eSIM, OnePlus has 2 physical SIM slots.
Storage
Internal128GB256GBMoto provides more storage for photos, videos, and apps.
RAM6GB or 8GB8GBMoto has more consistent RAM.
Expandable StorageNoNoNeither phone offers extra storage space via microSD.
Audio
QualityNoise cancellation microphoneDolby Atmos, Stereo Speakers, 2 microphonesMotorola offers a better sound experience.
Security
Featuresside-mounted fingerprintBasic fingerprint sensorOnePlus fingerprint is more secure.

2. Key Insights

OnePlus Nord CE 2 Lite 5G

  • Strengths:

    • Slightly faster charging: 33W will fill that battery up quicker than the Moto.
    • Depth and Macro Camera: Has dedicated sensors for these features.
    • Side-mounted fingerprint sensor: Some users prefer this over a basic fingerprint sensor.
    • Slightly newer Bluetooth
  • Competitive Advantages:

    • A bit more focus on traditional photography with its dedicated depth and macro lenses, and a side mounted fingerprint scanner.
    • Slightly more mature Bluetooth 5.2 with EDR and AAC codecs
  • Trade-offs/Limitations:
    • Older Android version with less guaranteed updates.
    • Less vivid display technology and lower brightness.
    • Inferior video recording quality.
    • Less processing power.
    • Limited storage and no expansion option.
    • Less Advanced Audio

Motorola Moto G Stylus 5G (2024)

  • Strengths:
    • Better Display: The P-OLED screen provides superior contrast and color.
    • Significantly Brighter Screen: Far better visibility in sunlight.
    • Faster Processor: Newer Snapdragon 6 Gen 1 for smoother everyday use.
    • Better Cameras: Larger main camera sensor, better selfies, optical image stabilization, and 4k recording.
    • More Storage: 256GB internal storage for more photos, videos, and apps.
    • Wireless and Reverse Charging: Extra charging options for convenience.
    • Modern OS Ships with Android 14 and will likely receive the upgrade to Android 15.
    • Better audio Due to having stereo speakers, Dolby Atmos, and 2 microphones.
    • eSIM: Flexibility to switch carriers with a digital SIM.
    • Better GPS Supports more satellite systems for higher location accuracy.
    • More Advanced WiFi Supporting Wifi 6E provides a much better connection.
  • Competitive Advantages:
    • A more future-proof device with a better processor, display, and overall features.
    • More storage space for files and applications.
    • More versatility with eSIM support and wireless charging.
  • Trade-offs/Limitations:
    • Slower charging speed, it is by just 3 watts though.
    • No dedicated depth or macro sensor
    • Less modern bluetooth.

3. User Profiles and Recommendations

  • OnePlus Nord CE 2 Lite 5G:
    • Best for: Budget-conscious users who prioritize fast charging and enjoy taking portraits or macro pictures.
    • Use Case: A good backup phone, social media consumption, or general use for users who have no need for video capture or fast gaming.
  • Motorola Moto G Stylus 5G (2024):
    • Best for: Users who need a well-rounded device with a great display, a good camera system, modern features, and enough storage.
    • Use Case: Multimedia consumption, everyday photography, and power users that need a little more from their daily driver.

4. Buying Decision Framework

Here are three questions to help you decide:

  1. Display Quality: Do you need a bright display that performs well outdoors?
    • If yes, the Motorola is the clear choice.
  2. Camera Needs: Is camera quality a priority, or do you need the convenience of a dedicated Macro and Portrait sensor?
    • If high quality is important, the Motorola's larger main sensor, OIS, and 4k recording are superior.
    • If portrait and macro mode is more important, the OnePlus will provide a more dedicated experience.
  3. Budget and Long-Term Value: Are you okay with a slightly older Android version and less future-proof phone to save money?
    • If budget is a major constraint, the OnePlus might be suitable. However, if you can spend a little more, the Moto is a superior phone.

Scenario-Based Recommendations:

  • Scenario 1 (Budget-Conscious): If your budget is very tight, and all you need is basic phone with a side mounted fingerprint sensor and depth sensors, consider the OnePlus.
  • Scenario 2 (Photography Enthusiast): If you plan to take more than simple point-and-shoot photos, the Motorola's more advanced main sensor, OIS, and extra features are preferable.
  • Scenario 3 (Daily Driver): If you are looking for a daily driver with a great display, good performance and up to date features, the Motorola is the more well rounded choice.
  • Scenario 4 (Media Consumption): If you watch lots of videos and want high-fidelity audio the Motorola with its P-OLED screen and Dolby Atmos is the way to go.

My Choice

If I had to choose between these two phones, I would go with the Motorola Moto G Stylus 5G (2024). It may come at a slightly higher price point, but the superior screen, faster processor, significantly better camera system, more storage, modern software, and convenient charging options would give a much more modern experience that would last longer overall. The lack of dedicated depth and macro lenses is negligible compared to the overall advantages of the Motorola phone. I wouldn't want to skimp on what makes the core of the device shine and the Motorola is much better in that aspect.

Alex Griffin
Alex Griffin

Technology analyst specializing in mobile devices and consumer electronics.

Core Expertise

  • Mobile technology analysis
  • Consumer electronics evaluation
  • Technical specification interpretation
  • User experience insights

Professional Mission Empowering readers to make informed technology decisions by transforming intricate specifications into understandable, practical guidance.

Demystifying technology, one device at a time.