OnePlus Nord 3 vs Xiaomi Poco C65 - Detailed Phone Comparison

Detailed Comparison

Specification
OnePlus Nord 3
OnePlus Nord 3
Oneplus

General

Launch Date July 11, 2023 November 6, 2023
Release Year 2023 2023

Physical

Volume 99.76 cm³ 106.14 cm³
Screen Size to Weight Ratio 3.48 "/g 3.51 "/g
Weight 193.5 g 192 g
Height 162 mm 168 mm
Width 75.1 mm 78 mm
Thickness 8.2 mm 8.1 mm
Foldable Design No No
Available Colors
  • Misty Green
  • Tempest Gray
  • Black
  • Blue
  • Purple

Display

Screen Size 6.74 " 6.74 "
Resolution 1240 x 2772 720 x 1600
Aspect Ratio 20:9 20:9
Screen-to-Body Ratio 89.8 % 83.7 %
Pixel Density 451 PPI 260 PPI
Refresh Rate 120 Hz 90 Hz
Typical Brightness N/A 450 nits
HBM Brightness N/A 600 nits
Peak Brightness 1450 nits N/A

Hardware

Battery Capacity per Screen Area 110.07 mAh/in² 110.07 mAh/in²
Battery Density 50.12 mAh/cm³ 47.11 mAh/cm³
Battery Capacity 5000 mAh 5000 mAh
NFC Support Yes Yes
Chipset Mediatek Dimensity 9000 (4 nm) Mediatek MT6769Z Helio G85 (12 nm)
CPU Octa-core (1x3.05 GHz Cortex-X2 & 3x2.85 GHz Cortex-A710 & 4x1.80 GHz Cortex-A510) Octa-core (2x2.0 GHz Cortex-A75 & 6x1.8 GHz Cortex-A55)
GPU Mali-G710 MC10 Mali-G52 MC2

Connectivity

USB Version 2.0 2.0
OTG Support 1
DisplayPort
DisplayPort Version N/A N/A
USB Features USB Type-C 2.0, OTG USB Type-C 2.0

Software

Operating System Android Android
Initial OS Version 13 13
Maximum OS Version 16

Comparison Summary

1. Specifications Comparison

FeatureOnePlus Nord 3Xiaomi Poco C65Practical Impact
Design
Dimensions (mm)162 x 75.1 x 8.2168 x 78 x 8.1Poco C65 is slightly larger and wider. Negligible difference in thickness.
Weight (g)193.5192Virtually identical weight.
Build MaterialsNot specifiedNot specifiedCannot compare build quality without further information.
Display
Display Type6.74" Fluid AMOLED, 120Hz6.74" IPS LCD, 90HzNord 3 offers superior contrast, deeper blacks, and smoother scrolling due to AMOLED technology and higher refresh rate.
Resolution1240 x 2772 (451 ppi)720 x 1600 (260 ppi)Nord 3 has significantly sharper and more detailed visuals. Poco C65's display will appear pixelated in comparison.
Brightness1450 nits (peak)450 nits (typ)Nord 3 will be much more visible in direct sunlight.
Performance
ChipsetMediaTek Dimensity 9000 (4 nm)MediaTek Helio G85 (12 nm)Nord 3 boasts a vastly more powerful and efficient processor, resulting in significantly faster performance, smoother multitasking, and better gaming capabilities.
CPUOcta-core (1x3.05 GHz Cortex-X2 & 3x2.85 GHz Cortex-A710 & 4x1.80 GHz Cortex-A510)Octa-core (2x2.0 GHz Cortex-A75 & 6x1.8 GHz Cortex-A55)Nord 3's CPU architecture is significantly more advanced, offering substantial performance gains.
GPUMali-G710 MC10Mali-G52 MC2Nord 3's GPU is considerably more capable for demanding gaming and graphics-intensive tasks.
RAM8GB/16GB6GB/8GBNord 3 offers more RAM in its higher-end configuration, improving multitasking performance.
Camera
Main Camera50MP Sony IMX89050MP Samsung S5KJN1While both have the same megapixel count, the sensor quality likely differs. Detailed sensor specifications missing for a comprehensive comparison.
Other Cameras8MP Wide, 2MP Macro2MP Macro, 2MP DepthNord 3 offers a more versatile setup with an ultrawide lens. Poco C65 includes a dedicated depth sensor, which might offer slightly better portrait mode shots.
Video Recording4K@60fps with EIS1080p@30fpsNord 3 allows for higher resolution and frame rate video recording, resulting in significantly better video quality.
Battery
Capacity5000 mAh5000 mAhIdentical battery capacity. Real-world battery life will depend on software optimization and usage patterns.
Charging SpeedNot SpecifiedNot SpecifiedCannot compare charging speeds without further data.

2. Key Differences Analysis

OnePlus Nord 3 Advantages:

  • Significantly superior performance: The Dimensity 9000 chipset provides a substantial performance advantage for demanding tasks and gaming.
  • Much better display: The AMOLED display with 120Hz refresh rate delivers vibrant colors, deeper blacks, and smoother scrolling compared to the Poco C65's LCD.
  • Higher resolution display: Sharper visuals and greater detail.
  • Superior video recording capabilities: 4K@60fps with EIS provides much higher quality videos.

Xiaomi Poco C65 Advantages:

  • Lower price: Positioned in the low price range, offering greater affordability.

Trade-offs:

  • Performance vs. Price: The Poco C65 sacrifices performance and display quality for affordability. The Nord 3 prioritizes performance and a premium display experience at a higher cost.

3. User Profiles & Recommendations

OnePlus Nord 3: Users who prioritize performance, a high-quality display, and smooth multitasking. Suitable for demanding tasks, gaming, and media consumption.

Xiaomi Poco C65: Budget-conscious users who prioritize basic functionality and affordability over high performance. Suitable for light usage, such as calling, texting, web browsing, and social media.

4. Decision Framework

Key Questions:

  1. What is your budget? The Poco C65 is significantly cheaper.
  2. What are your primary use cases? For demanding tasks and gaming, the Nord 3 is essential.
  3. How important is display quality? The Nord 3's AMOLED display offers a vastly superior visual experience.

My Choice: OnePlus Nord 3

The OnePlus Nord 3 is the clear winner for me. While the Poco C65 offers a budget-friendly option, the significant performance difference, vastly superior display, and better camera capabilities of the Nord 3 make it a much more compelling device. I prioritize a smooth and responsive user experience, and the Nord 3's powerful chipset and high refresh rate display deliver on that front. The price difference is justified by the noticeable upgrade in overall quality and user experience. The Poco C65 is a decent option for extremely budget-conscious buyers, but the compromises in performance and display are too significant for me to overlook.

Emily Harper
Emily Harper

Technology Insights Specialist

Dedicated technology writer specializing in mobile device analysis and technology communication. Expert at translating complex smartphone features into clear, actionable insights for diverse audiences.

Key Strengths:

  • Mobile technology analysis
  • Digital media communication
  • Technical storytelling
  • User-centric technology insights

Bridging technical complexity with engaging, accessible narratives.