OnePlus 10T vs Motorola Razr 40 Ultra - Detailed Phone Comparison

Detailed Comparison

Specification
OnePlus 10T
OnePlus 10T
Oneplus

General

Launch Date August 6, 2022 June 5, 2023
Release Year 2022 2023

Physical

Volume 108.15 cm³ 88.47 cm³
Screen Size to Weight Ratio 3.28 "/g 3.74 "/g
Weight 204 g 184.5 g
Height 163 mm 170.8 mm
Width 75.4 mm 74 mm
Thickness 8.8 mm 7 mm
Foldable Design No Yes
Available Colors
  • Moonstone Black
  • Jade Green
  • Glacier Blue
  • Viva Magenta
  • Infinite Black
  • Peach Fuzz

Display

Screen Size 6.7 " 6.9 "
Resolution 1080 x 2412 1080 x 2640
Aspect Ratio 20:9 22:9
Screen-to-Body Ratio 87.9 % 85.2 %
Pixel Density 394 PPI 413 PPI
Refresh Rate 120 Hz 165 Hz
Typical Brightness N/A N/A
HBM Brightness N/A N/A
Peak Brightness N/A 1400 nits

Hardware

Battery Capacity per Screen Area 106.93 mAh/in² 79.82 mAh/in²
Battery Density 44.38 mAh/cm³ 42.95 mAh/cm³
Battery Capacity 4800 mAh 3800 mAh
NFC Support Yes Yes
Chipset Qualcomm SM8475 Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 (4 nm) Qualcomm SM8475 Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 (4 nm)
CPU Octa-core (1x3.19 GHz Cortex-X2 & 3x2.75 GHz Cortex-A710 & 4x1.80 GHz Cortex-A510) Octa-core (1x3.19 GHz Cortex-X2 & 3x2.75 GHz Cortex-A710 & 4x1.80 GHz Cortex-A510)
GPU Adreno 730 Adreno 730

Connectivity

USB Version 2.0 2.0
OTG Support
DisplayPort
DisplayPort Version N/A N/A
USB Features USB Type-C 2.0 USB Type-C 2.0

Software

Operating System Android Android
Initial OS Version 12 13
Maximum OS Version 16

Comparison Summary

OnePlus 10T vs. Motorola Razr 40 Ultra: A Detailed Comparison

The smartphone landscape is filled with compelling choices, and deciding between two seemingly similar devices can be challenging. Today, we'll dissect the OnePlus 10T and the Motorola Razr 40 Ultra, two phones with powerful processors but distinct design philosophies. This analysis will equip you with the knowledge to choose the device that best aligns with your needs.

1. Specifications Breakdown

FeatureOnePlus 10TMotorola Razr 40 UltraReal-World Implications
Design
Form FactorCandybarFoldableRazr offers compact portability when folded, but larger screen real estate when unfolded. 10T is a traditional slab phone.
Dimensions (mm)163 x 75.4 x 8.8170.8 x 74 x 7 (folded)Razr is significantly thinner when folded, impacting pocketability. 10T is thinner unfolded.
Weight (g)204184.5Razr is lighter despite its larger unfolded display.
Display
Size (inches)6.76.9Razr boasts a slightly larger main screen.
Resolution (px)1080 x 24121080 x 2640Both offer Full HD+ resolution, but Razr's taller aspect ratio provides more vertical space.
Refresh Rate (Hz)120165Razr's higher refresh rate translates to smoother animations and scrolling, particularly noticeable in games and fast-paced content.
Display TypeFluid AMOLEDFoldable LTPO AMOLEDRazr's folding screen technology allows for a unique user experience with its external display. LTPO potentially offers better battery efficiency.
Performance
ChipsetSnapdragon 8+ Gen 1Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1Identical chipsets indicate comparable processing power for demanding tasks and gaming on both phones.
CPUOcta-coreOcta-coreBoth have powerful octa-core CPUs with similar core configurations.
GPUAdreno 730Adreno 730Identical GPUs provide comparable graphics performance.
RAM (GB)8/12/168/12Both offer ample RAM for multitasking, but the 10T offers a 16GB option for extreme power users.
Camera
Main Camera (MP)501210T has a significantly higher resolution main sensor, potentially capturing more detail. Razr focuses on other features and usability.
Selfie Camera (MP)1632Razr has a higher resolution selfie camera.
Battery Life
Capacity (mAh)4800380010T has a larger battery capacity, suggesting potentially longer battery life.
Fast Charging (W)1503010T offers significantly faster charging speeds.

2. Key Insights

  • Performance Parity: Both phones utilize the same powerful Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 processor, ensuring smooth performance even with demanding tasks.
  • Display Differences: While both have high-quality displays, the Razr's foldable screen and higher refresh rate create a more dynamic and responsive user experience. However, the crease in the folding display might bother some users.
  • Camera Trade-offs: The 10T boasts a higher resolution main camera sensor, likely delivering superior detail in photos. The Razr, with its lower resolution but wider aperture on the main lens and higher resolution selfie camera, prioritizes different aspects of mobile photography. The external display allows for unique selfie capabilities.
  • Battery and Charging: The 10T's larger battery and significantly faster charging give it a clear edge in terms of power management. The Razr's smaller battery is likely a compromise for its foldable design.

3. User Profiles and Recommendations

  • OnePlus 10T: Ideal for power users, gamers, and those prioritizing raw performance, battery life, and fast charging. Its robust camera system is also a strong selling point for photography enthusiasts.
  • Motorola Razr 40 Ultra: Perfect for users seeking a unique and innovative device that combines style and portability. The foldable design and external display offer distinct advantages for quick interactions and selfies. It's a statement piece that sacrifices some battery life and camera prowess for its form factor.

4. Buying Decision Framework

  1. Is a foldable design a priority? If yes, the Razr is the obvious choice. If not, consider the other factors.
  2. How important is battery life and charging speed? The 10T offers a clear advantage in this area.
  3. What is your budget? Both phones are in a similar price range, but specific configurations and regional pricing may vary.

My Choice: OnePlus 10T

While the Razr 40 Ultra is undeniably cool and innovative, as a tech journalist focused on practical utility, I'd choose the OnePlus 10T. Its superior battery life, blazing fast charging, and higher-resolution main camera are significant advantages for my daily workflow. I appreciate the focus on core performance and user experience that the 10T delivers. While the Razr's foldable design is intriguing, I find the longer battery life, faster charging, and higher resolution main camera of the 10T to be more compelling for my needs. The traditional slab form factor is also more robust and reliable in the long run in my experience.

Alex Griffin
Alex Griffin

Technology analyst specializing in mobile devices and consumer electronics.

Core Expertise

  • Mobile technology analysis
  • Consumer electronics evaluation
  • Technical specification interpretation
  • User experience insights

Professional Mission Empowering readers to make informed technology decisions by transforming intricate specifications into understandable, practical guidance.

Demystifying technology, one device at a time.