Nothing Phone (2) vs Xiaomi Poco F6 Pro - Detailed Phone Comparison

Detailed Comparison

Specification

General

Launch Date July 17, 2023 May 23, 2024
Release Year 2023 2024

Physical

Volume 106.51 cm³ 98.95 cm³
Screen Size to Weight Ratio 3.33 "/g 3.19 "/g
Weight 201.2 g 209 g
Height 162.1 mm 160.9 mm
Width 76.4 mm 75 mm
Thickness 8.6 mm 8.2 mm
Foldable Design No No
Available Colors
  • White
  • Dark Gray
  • Black
  • White

Display

Screen Size 6.7 " 6.67 "
Resolution 1080 x 2412 1440 x 3200
Aspect Ratio 20:9 20:9
Screen-to-Body Ratio 87.2 % 89 %
Pixel Density 394 PPI 526 PPI
Refresh Rate 120 Hz 120 Hz
Typical Brightness N/A 700 nits
HBM Brightness 1600 nits 1200 nits
Peak Brightness 1600 nits 4000 nits

Hardware

Battery Capacity per Screen Area 104.70 mAh/in² 112.39 mAh/in²
Battery Density 44.13 mAh/cm³ 50.53 mAh/cm³
Battery Capacity 4700 mAh 5000 mAh
NFC Support Yes Yes
Chipset Qualcomm SM8475 Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 (4 nm) Qualcomm SM8550-AB Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 (4 nm)
CPU Octa-core (1x3.0 GHz Cortex-X2 & 3x2.5 GHz Cortex-A710 & 4x1.80 GHz Cortex-A510) Octa-core (1x3.2 GHz Cortex-X3 & 2x2.8 GHz Cortex-A715 & 2x2.8 GHz Cortex-A710 & 3x2.0 GHz Cortex-A510)
GPU Adreno 730 Adreno 740

Connectivity

USB Version 2.0 2.0
OTG Support 1 1
DisplayPort
DisplayPort Version N/A N/A
USB Features USB Type-C 2.0, OTG USB Type-C 2.0, OTG

Software

Operating System Android Android
Initial OS Version 13 14
Maximum OS Version 16 17

Comparison Summary

1. Specifications Comparison

FeatureNothing Phone (2)Xiaomi Poco F6 ProPractical Impact
Design
Dimensions162.1 x 76.4 x 8.6 mm160.9 x 75 x 8.2 mmPoco F6 Pro is slightly shorter, narrower, and thinner. Negligible difference in hand feel.
Weight201.2 g209 gPoco F6 Pro is slightly heavier, but the difference is minimal.
BuildUnspecifiedUnspecifiedBuild materials impact durability and premium feel. This information is missing.
Display
Size6.7"6.67"Virtually identical screen sizes.
TypeLTPO OLEDAMOLEDBoth offer excellent contrast and colors. LTPO allows for dynamic refresh rate adjustment, potentially saving battery.
Resolution1080 x 24121440 x 3200Poco F6 Pro has a significantly sharper display (higher pixel density). Noticeably crisper text and images.
Refresh Rate120Hz120HzBoth offer smooth scrolling and animations.
Peak Brightness1600 nits4000 nitsPoco F6 Pro offers much higher peak brightness, significantly improving outdoor visibility.
Performance
ChipsetSnapdragon 8+ Gen 1Snapdragon 8 Gen 2Poco F6 Pro has a newer, more powerful processor, resulting in faster performance and better efficiency.
CPUOcta-core (1x3.0 GHz Cortex-X2...)Octa-core (1x3.2 GHz Cortex-X3...)Poco F6 Pro's CPU offers performance improvements due to newer architecture.
GPUAdreno 730Adreno 740Poco F6 Pro's GPU provides better graphics performance for demanding games and applications.
RAM/Storage256GB/12GB, 512GB/12GB512GB/12GB, 1000GB/16GBPoco F6 Pro offers a 1TB storage option for users needing vast amounts of space. Both have ample RAM for multitasking.
Camera
Video Capabilities4K@30/60fps (OIS, EIS)8K@24fps, 4K@60fps, up to 960fps slow-moPoco F6 Pro offers more versatile video recording options including 8K and higher frame rate slow-motion. Missing details on OIS for Poco F6 Pro.
Battery
Capacity4700 mAh5000 mAhPoco F6 Pro has a larger battery capacity, potentially offering longer battery life.

2. Key Differences Analysis

Nothing Phone (2) Advantages:

  • Potentially better battery life due to LTPO display technology.

Xiaomi Poco F6 Pro Advantages:

  • Significantly brighter and sharper display.
  • More powerful and efficient processor (Snapdragon 8 Gen 2).
  • More versatile video recording capabilities.
  • Larger battery capacity.
  • Larger storage option (1TB).

Trade-offs:

  • Poco F6 Pro's higher resolution and brightness might impact battery life despite the larger battery.

3. User Profiles & Recommendations

Nothing Phone (2): Users prioritizing a unique design (assuming based on the brand's focus), potentially longer battery life, and who don't need the absolute best performance or display sharpness.

Xiaomi Poco F6 Pro: Users who demand top-tier performance, a brilliant and sharp display, versatile video recording capabilities, and ample storage. Suitable for mobile gamers, power users, and content creators.

4. Decision Framework

Key Questions:

  1. What is your budget? Both are mid-range but potential price differences could be significant.
  2. What are your primary use cases? (Gaming, photography, general use)
  3. How important is battery life vs. performance and display quality?

Scenario-Based Recommendations:

  • Heavy gamer: Poco F6 Pro for its superior performance and sharper display.
  • Casual user: Either phone could be suitable depending on individual priorities for battery life, display quality, and price.
  • Content creator: Poco F6 Pro for its superior video recording capabilities and large storage option.

My Choice: Xiaomi Poco F6 Pro

While the Nothing Phone (2) might offer slightly better battery life due to LTPO, the Poco F6 Pro's significant advantages in performance, display quality, and video recording capabilities are more compelling to me. The Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 provides a noticeable real-world performance boost, and the brighter, sharper display enhances the overall user experience. The versatile video recording features and larger storage option further solidify the Poco F6 Pro as the better choice for my needs, assuming a comparable price point. I prioritize a smooth and responsive user experience and a high-quality display, making the Poco F6 Pro the clear winner. The potential trade-off in battery life is acceptable considering the significant gains in other areas.

Emily Harper
Emily Harper

Technology Insights Specialist

Dedicated technology writer specializing in mobile device analysis and technology communication. Expert at translating complex smartphone features into clear, actionable insights for diverse audiences.

Key Strengths:

  • Mobile technology analysis
  • Digital media communication
  • Technical storytelling
  • User-centric technology insights

Bridging technical complexity with engaging, accessible narratives.