Nothing Phone (2) vs Samsung Galaxy A55 - Detailed Phone Comparison

Detailed Comparison

Specification

General

Launch Date July 17, 2023 March 15, 2024
Release Year 2023 2024

Physical

Volume 106.51 cm³ 102.25 cm³
Screen Size to Weight Ratio 3.33 "/g 3.1 "/g
Weight 201.2 g 213 g
Height 162.1 mm 161.1 mm
Width 76.4 mm 77.4 mm
Thickness 8.6 mm 8.2 mm
Foldable Design No No
Available Colors
  • White
  • Dark Gray
  • Navy
  • Iceblue
  • Lilac
  • Lemon

Display

Screen Size 6.7 " 6.6 "
Resolution 1080 x 2412 1080 x 2340
Aspect Ratio 20:9 19.5:9
Screen-to-Body Ratio 87.2 % 85.8 %
Pixel Density 394 PPI 390 PPI
Refresh Rate 120 Hz 120 Hz
Typical Brightness N/A N/A
HBM Brightness 1600 nits 1000 nits
Peak Brightness 1600 nits N/A

Hardware

Battery Capacity per Screen Area 104.70 mAh/in² 114.78 mAh/in²
Battery Density 44.13 mAh/cm³ 48.9 mAh/cm³
Battery Capacity 4700 mAh 5000 mAh
NFC Support Yes Yes
Chipset Qualcomm SM8475 Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 (4 nm) Exynos 1480 (4 nm)
CPU Octa-core (1x3.0 GHz Cortex-X2 & 3x2.5 GHz Cortex-A710 & 4x1.80 GHz Cortex-A510) Octa-core (4x2.75 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55)
GPU Adreno 730 Xclipse 530

Connectivity

USB Version 2.0 2.0
OTG Support 1 1
DisplayPort
DisplayPort Version N/A N/A
USB Features USB Type-C 2.0, OTG USB Type-C 2.0, OTG

Software

Operating System Android Android
Initial OS Version 13 14
Maximum OS Version 16 18

Comparison Summary

1. Specifications Comparison

FeatureCategoryNothing Phone (2)Samsung Galaxy A55Practical Impact
DimensionsDesign162.1 x 76.4 x 8.6 mm161.1 x 77.4 x 8.2 mmVirtually identical in hand feel; A55 slightly thinner.
WeightDesign201.2 g213 gNoticeable difference; Phone (2) feels lighter.
BuildDesignMissingMissingMaterial differences (e.g., glass vs. plastic) impact durability and premium feel, but information is lacking.
Display TypeDisplayLTPO OLED, 1B colorsSuper AMOLEDBoth offer vibrant colors and deep blacks. LTPO allows for more granular refresh rate control, potentially saving battery.
Display SizeDisplay6.7"6.6"Negligible size difference.
ResolutionDisplay1080 x 24121080 x 2340Similar sharpness; minimal practical difference.
Refresh RateDisplay120Hz120HzBoth offer smooth scrolling and animations.
Peak BrightnessDisplay1600 nitsMissingPhone (2) likely offers superior outdoor visibility. Missing A55 value prevents definitive conclusion.
ChipsetPerformanceSnapdragon 8+ Gen 1Exynos 1480Phone (2) likely offers significantly better performance in demanding tasks and gaming.
CPUPerformanceOcta-core (1x3.0 GHz Cortex-X2 & 3x2.5 GHz Cortex-A710 & 4x1.80 GHz Cortex-A510)Octa-core (4x2.75 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55)Phone (2)'s more modern CPU architecture suggests superior performance and efficiency.
GPUPerformanceAdreno 730Xclipse 530Phone (2) likely offers better gaming and graphics performance.
RAMPerformance12GB8GB/12GB12GB offers better multitasking; impact depends on the A55 variant chosen.
StoragePerformance256GB/512GB256GBComparable storage options for most users.
Battery CapacityBattery4700 mAh5000 mAhA55 has a larger battery, potentially offering longer battery life. Real-world usage will vary.
OSSoftwareAndroid 13Android 14A55 launches with a newer Android version, potentially offering more features and longer software support.
Main CameraCameraMissingMissingCrucial information missing to compare camera quality.
Video CapabilitiesCamera4K@30/60fps (OIS, EIS)4K@30fps (EIS)Phone (2) offers more advanced video recording capabilities with optical image stabilization (OIS) at higher frame rates.

2. Key Differences Analysis

Nothing Phone (2) Advantages:

  • Superior Performance: The Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 provides significantly better performance for demanding tasks, gaming, and multitasking.
  • Brighter Display: The 1600 nits peak brightness ensures excellent outdoor visibility.
  • More Advanced Video Recording: OIS and higher frame rate options enable smoother, more stable videos.

Samsung Galaxy A55 Advantages:

  • Larger Battery: The 5000 mAh battery may offer longer battery life.
  • Newer OS: Ships with Android 14, offering potential feature and software update advantages.
  • Potentially Lower Price: While both are mid-range, the A55 might be priced lower depending on RAM configuration.

3. User Profiles & Recommendations

Nothing Phone (2): Ideal for users who prioritize performance, a vibrant display, and smooth gaming. Excellent for power users, mobile gamers, and content creators.

Samsung Galaxy A55: Potentially a good choice for users who prioritize battery life and value a newer operating system. Suitable for everyday users who focus on communication, social media, and light content consumption.

4. Decision Framework

Key Questions:

  1. What is your budget? Compare prices for specific storage/RAM configurations.
  2. What are your primary smartphone uses? Gaming, photography, social media, etc.
  3. How important is long-term software support?

Scenario-Based Recommendations:

  • Heavy Gamer: Nothing Phone (2) due to its superior performance.
  • Budget-Conscious User: A55 if it offers better value for the price.
  • User Prioritizing Battery Life: A55, pending real-world battery tests.

My Choice: Nothing Phone (2)

While lacking complete camera specifications and concrete pricing information limits a definitive conclusion, the Nothing Phone (2) offers a compelling package based on the available data. The significant performance advantage offered by the Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, combined with the brighter display and advanced video capabilities, outweighs the potential benefits of the A55's larger battery and newer OS for my personal use. I prioritize a smooth and responsive user experience, especially for gaming and multitasking, making the Phone (2) the more attractive option. However, if battery life is paramount and budget is a major constraint, the A55 could be a viable alternative pending further investigation, particularly around real-world battery performance and pricing.

Emily Harper
Emily Harper

Technology Insights Specialist

Dedicated technology writer specializing in mobile device analysis and technology communication. Expert at translating complex smartphone features into clear, actionable insights for diverse audiences.

Key Strengths:

  • Mobile technology analysis
  • Digital media communication
  • Technical storytelling
  • User-centric technology insights

Bridging technical complexity with engaging, accessible narratives.