Nothing Phone (2a) vs Samsung Galaxy M35 - Detailed Phone Comparison

Detailed Comparison

Specification

General

Launch Date March 12, 2024 May 24, 2024
Release Year 2024 2024

Physical

Volume 106.1 cm³ 116.09 cm³
Screen Size to Weight Ratio 3.53 "/g 2.97 "/g
Weight 190 g 222 g
Height 161.7 mm 162.3 mm
Width 76.3 mm 78.6 mm
Thickness 8.6 mm 9.1 mm
Foldable Design No No
Available Colors
  • Black
  • Blue
  • White
  • Milk
  • Gray
  • Light Blue
  • Dark Blue

Display

Screen Size 6.7 " 6.6 "
Resolution 1080 x 2412 1080 x 2340
Aspect Ratio 20:9 19.5:9
Screen-to-Body Ratio 87.6 % 83.8 %
Pixel Density 394 PPI 390 PPI
Refresh Rate 120 Hz 120 Hz
Typical Brightness 700 nits N/A
HBM Brightness 1100 nits 1000 nits
Peak Brightness 1300 nits N/A

Hardware

Battery Capacity per Screen Area 111.38 mAh/in² 137.74 mAh/in²
Battery Density 47.12 mAh/cm³ 51.69 mAh/cm³
Battery Capacity 5000 mAh 6000 mAh
NFC Support Yes Yes
Chipset Mediatek Dimensity 7200 Pro (4 nm) Exynos 1380 (5 nm)
CPU Octa-core (2x2.8 GHz Cortex-A715 & 6x 2.0 Cortex-A510) Octa-core (4x2.4 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55)
GPU Mali-G610 MC4 Mali-G68 MP5

Connectivity

USB Version 2.0 2.0
OTG Support 1 1
DisplayPort
DisplayPort Version N/A N/A
USB Features USB Type-C 2.0, OTG USB Type-C 2.0, OTG

Software

Operating System Android Android
Initial OS Version 14 14
Maximum OS Version 17

Comparison Summary

The Tale of Two Mid-Range Marvels: Nothing Phone (2) vs. Samsung Galaxy M35

As a technology communications specialist, my goal isn't just to list specifications, but to weave a narrative that illuminates the user experience. Let's embark on a journey to understand the souls of two compelling mid-range contenders: the Nothing Phone (2) and the Samsung Galaxy M35.

1. Design and Usability Assessment:

FeatureNothing Phone (2)Samsung Galaxy M35User Experience Impact
Interface DesignGlyph Interface, Clean Android SkinOne UI, CustomizableNothing's Glyph offers unique notification interactions. Samsung's One UI provides familiarity and flexibility.
Interaction FlowSmooth, 120Hz AMOLED displaySmooth, 120Hz Super AMOLED displayBoth offer fluid navigation, though Nothing's peak brightness (1300 nits) enhances outdoor visibility.
Accessibility FeaturesStandard Android Accessibility SuiteOne UI Accessibility FeaturesComparable accessibility features across both platforms.
Design ErgonomicsLighter (190g), Slimmer (8.6mm)Heavier (222g), Thicker (9.1mm)Nothing Phone (2) offers a more comfortable one-handed experience due to its lighter and slimmer profile.

2. Narrative-Driven Feature Exploration:

Scenario: Imagine you're at a bustling concert. With the Nothing Phone (2), the Glyph Interface pulses with unique light patterns for notifications, allowing you to discreetly filter important messages without disrupting your immersion in the music. Conversely, the Samsung Galaxy M35, with its robust 6000mAh battery, ensures you capture every moment without worrying about battery drain, offering peace of mind throughout the event.

Design Choice Impact: Nothing's design prioritizes distinctive communication and visual feedback, while Samsung focuses on reliability and endurance.

3. Inclusive Technology Evaluation:

User Perspective 1: The Young Professional: Values style and seamless multitasking. The Nothing Phone (2)'s sleek design and powerful Dimensity 7200 Pro processor cater to their needs.

User Perspective 2: The Budget-Conscious Student: Prioritizes battery life and affordability. The Samsung Galaxy M35's larger battery and competitive price point make it a compelling option.

4. Design-Centric Decision Framework:

Choosing Your Champion:

  • Prioritize Unique Style and Visual Feedback: Nothing Phone (2)
  • Prioritize Battery Life and Familiar Interface: Samsung Galaxy M35

Beyond the Specs:

This comparison transcends mere numbers. It's about understanding how design choices translate into tangible user experiences. The Nothing Phone (2) embraces innovation with its Glyph Interface, offering a fresh perspective on mobile interactions. The Samsung Galaxy M35 champions practicality and endurance, appealing to users seeking reliability. Ultimately, the best choice depends on individual priorities and how a device integrates into their unique lifestyle. My analysis aims to empower you to make an informed decision, choosing a device that resonates with your personal needs and preferences.

Sophia Rodriguez
Sophia Rodriguez

Technology Communications Specialist

Expert in transforming complex technological innovations into accessible, engaging narratives.

Key Strengths:

  • Technology storytelling
  • User experience design analysis
  • Inclusive technology communication
  • Design-driven technology insights

Bridging technical complexity with human-centered understanding.