Nothing Phone (2a) vs Motorola Razr 50 - Detailed Phone Comparison

Detailed Comparison

Specification
Motorola Razr 50
Motorola Razr 50
Motorola

General

Launch Date March 12, 2024 June 25, 2024
Release Year 2024 2024

Physical

Volume 106.1 cm³ 92.54 cm³
Screen Size to Weight Ratio 3.53 "/g 3.66 "/g
Weight 190 g 188.4 g
Height 161.7 mm 171.3 mm
Width 76.3 mm 74 mm
Thickness 8.6 mm 7.3 mm
Foldable Design No Yes
Available Colors
  • Black
  • Blue
  • White
  • Milk
  • Koala Grey (Steel Wool)
  • Beach Sand (Pumice Stone)
  • Spritz Orange (Arabesque)

Display

Screen Size 6.7 " 6.9 "
Resolution 1080 x 2412 1080 x 2640
Aspect Ratio 20:9 22:9
Screen-to-Body Ratio 87.6 % 84.9 %
Pixel Density 394 PPI 413 PPI
Refresh Rate 120 Hz 120 Hz
Typical Brightness 700 nits N/A
HBM Brightness 1100 nits N/A
Peak Brightness 1300 nits 3000 nits

Hardware

Battery Capacity per Screen Area 111.38 mAh/in² 88.22 mAh/in²
Battery Density 47.12 mAh/cm³ 45.39 mAh/cm³
Battery Capacity 5000 mAh 4200 mAh
NFC Support Yes Yes
Chipset Mediatek Dimensity 7200 Pro (4 nm) Mediatek Dimensity 7300X (4 nm)
CPU Octa-core (2x2.8 GHz Cortex-A715 & 6x 2.0 Cortex-A510) Octa-core (4x2.5 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55)
GPU Mali-G610 MC4 Mali-G615 MC2

Connectivity

USB Version 2.0 2.0
OTG Support 1
DisplayPort
DisplayPort Version N/A N/A
USB Features USB Type-C 2.0, OTG USB Type-C 2.0

Software

Operating System Android Android
Initial OS Version 14 14
Maximum OS Version 17

Comparison Summary

Nothing Phone (2a) vs. Motorola Razr 50: A Detailed Comparison

The mid-range smartphone market heats up with the Nothing Phone (2a) and the Motorola Razr 50. While both offer compelling features, their distinct strengths cater to different user needs. Let's dissect their specifications and uncover which device reigns supreme in various real-world scenarios.

1. Specifications Breakdown

FeatureNothing Phone (2a)Motorola Razr 50Real-World Implications
Design
Dimensions161.7 x 76.3 x 8.6 mm171.3 x 74 x 7.3mm (Unfolded)Razr 50 significantly more compact when folded, pocketable; Nothing Phone (2a) thinner, feels sleeker.
Weight190g188.4gNegligible weight difference in practical use.
FoldableNoYesRazr 50 offers a compact form factor when folded, unique user experience.
Display
Size6.7"6.9"Razr 50 offers slightly larger screen real estate.
TypeAMOLED, 120Hz, HDR10+Foldable LTPO AMOLED, 120Hz, HDR10+Both offer vibrant colors, smooth scrolling; Razr 50's foldable display is the differentiator.
Peak Brightness1300 nits3000 nitsRazr 50 dramatically brighter, superior outdoor visibility.
Resolution1080 x 24121080 x 2640Comparable sharpness; Razr 50 slightly taller aspect ratio.
Performance
ChipsetMediatek Dimensity 7200 Pro (4 nm)Mediatek Dimensity 7300X (4 nm)Both offer solid mid-range performance; 7300X potentially slightly faster, more efficient.
CPUOcta-core (2x2.8 GHz A715, 6x2.0 GHz A510)Octa-core (4x2.5 GHz A78, 4x2.0 GHz A55)7300X likely provides better sustained performance in demanding tasks.
GPUMali-G610 MC4Mali-G615 MC27300X expected to have an edge in graphical performance.
RAM12GB12GBAmple memory for multitasking on both devices.
Storage256GB512GBRazr 50 offers double the storage capacity.
Battery Life
Capacity5000 mAh4200 mAhNothing Phone (2a) likely offers longer battery life due to larger capacity.

2. Key Insights

  • Design and Form Factor: The Razr 50's foldable design is its defining feature. Its compact folded size offers unparalleled portability. However, the folding mechanism introduces potential durability concerns and a crease on the main display. The Nothing Phone (2a), with its sleek, thin profile, prioritizes a traditional smartphone experience.
  • Display Quality: While both boast vibrant AMOLED displays with 120Hz refresh rates, the Razr 50's significantly higher peak brightness ensures exceptional outdoor visibility.
  • Performance Prowess: Both chipsets deliver solid mid-range performance, but the Dimensity 7300X in the Razr 50, with its more powerful CPU and GPU configuration, is likely to offer a smoother experience in demanding tasks and gaming.
  • Battery Endurance: The Nothing Phone (2a)'s larger 5000 mAh battery likely translates to longer usage time between charges, a crucial advantage for power users. The Razr 50's smaller battery capacity is a trade-off for its compact foldable design.

3. User Profiles and Recommendations

  • Nothing Phone (2a): Ideal for users who prioritize a traditional smartphone experience with a long-lasting battery, sleek design, and smooth performance. Excellent for media consumption, gaming, and everyday productivity.
  • Motorola Razr 50: Perfect for users who value portability and a unique, stylish device. The compact folded size is a game-changer for those constantly on the move. The foldable form factor also enhances certain use cases like video calls and hands-free media consumption.

4. Buying Decision Framework

Questions to Consider:

  1. Portability vs. Battery Life: Is ultimate portability more important than all-day battery life?
  2. Traditional vs. Foldable: Do you prefer a familiar smartphone experience or embrace the novelty and compactness of a foldable device?
  3. Price Sensitivity: Considering the expected price difference, which device offers the best value for your specific needs?

Scenario-Based Recommendations:

  • Frequent Traveler: Razr 50 - its compact size is ideal for travel.
  • Heavy Smartphone User: Nothing Phone (2a) - the larger battery ensures longer usage.
  • Tech Enthusiast: Razr 50 - the foldable design offers a unique and innovative experience.

This in-depth analysis should empower you to make an informed decision between the Nothing Phone (2a) and the Motorola Razr 50. Remember, the "best" phone depends entirely on your individual needs and priorities.

Alex Griffin
Alex Griffin

Technology analyst specializing in mobile devices and consumer electronics.

Core Expertise

  • Mobile technology analysis
  • Consumer electronics evaluation
  • Technical specification interpretation
  • User experience insights

Professional Mission Empowering readers to make informed technology decisions by transforming intricate specifications into understandable, practical guidance.

Demystifying technology, one device at a time.