Nothing Phone (1) vs Samsung Galaxy M15 - Detailed Phone Comparison

Detailed Comparison

Specification

General

Launch Date July 16, 2022 April 5, 2024
Release Year 2022 2024

Physical

Volume 100.16 cm³ 114.35 cm³
Screen Size to Weight Ratio 3.39 "/g 3 "/g
Weight 193.5 g 217 g
Height 159.2 mm 160.1 mm
Width 75.8 mm 76.8 mm
Thickness 8.3 mm 9.3 mm
Foldable Design No No
Available Colors
  • Black
  • White
  • Gray
  • Light Blue
  • Dark Blue

Display

Screen Size 6.55 " 6.5 "
Resolution 1080 x 2400 1080 x 2340
Aspect Ratio 20:9 19.5:9
Screen-to-Body Ratio 85.8 % 84.3 %
Pixel Density 402 PPI 396 PPI
Refresh Rate 120 Hz 90 Hz
Typical Brightness 500 nits N/A
HBM Brightness N/A 800 nits
Peak Brightness 1200 nits N/A

Hardware

Battery Capacity per Screen Area 104.89 mAh/in² 142.01 mAh/in²
Battery Density 44.93 mAh/cm³ 52.47 mAh/cm³
Battery Capacity 4500 mAh 6000 mAh
NFC Support Yes Yes
Chipset Qualcomm SM7325-AE Snapdragon 778G+ 5G (6 nm) Mediatek Dimensity 6100+ (6 nm)
CPU Octa-core (1x2.5 GHz Cortex-A78 & 3x2.4 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x1.9 GHz Cortex-A55) Octa-core (2x2.2 GHz Cortex-A76 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55)
GPU Adreno 642L Mali-G57 MC2

Connectivity

USB Version 2.0 2.0
OTG Support 1
DisplayPort
DisplayPort Version N/A N/A
USB Features USB Type-C 2.0, OTG USB Type-C 2.0

Software

Operating System Android Android
Initial OS Version 12 14
Maximum OS Version 15

Comparison Summary

Nothing Phone (1) vs. Samsung Galaxy M15: A Deep Dive

Let's dissect the Nothing Phone (1) and the Samsung Galaxy M15, going beyond the spec sheet to understand what these devices offer in the real world.

1. Specifications Breakdown

FeatureNothing Phone (1)Samsung Galaxy M15Real-World Implications
Design
Dimensions (mm)159.2 x 75.8 x 8.3160.1 x 76.8 x 9.3Nothing Phone (1) is slightly more compact and thinner.
Weight (g)193.5217Noticeable difference in hand feel; Galaxy M15 might feel heavier for extended use.
Build MaterialsGlass front/back, aluminum framePlastic bodyNothing Phone (1) feels more premium; Galaxy M15 prioritizes durability over sheer aesthetics.
Display
Display Type6.55" OLED, 120Hz, HDR10+6.5" Super AMOLED, 90HzBoth offer vibrant colors and smooth scrolling; Nothing Phone (1) has a slightly faster refresh rate and HDR10+ for enhanced visuals.
Resolution1080 x 24001080 x 2340Virtually indistinguishable sharpness in daily use.
Peak Brightness1200 nits800 nitsNothing Phone (1) is significantly brighter, improving outdoor visibility.
Performance
ChipsetSnapdragon 778G+ 5G (6nm)Mediatek Dimensity 6100+ (6nm)Both offer solid mid-range performance; benchmarks would be needed for precise comparison.
CPUOcta-core (1x2.5 GHz + 3x2.4 GHz + 4x1.9 GHz)Octa-core (2x2.2 GHz + 6x2.0 GHz)Similar CPU configurations, though architectural differences might impact performance nuances.
GPUAdreno 642LMali-G57 MC2Adreno GPUs generally have a stronger gaming reputation.
RAM8GB/12GB4GB/6GBMore RAM in Nothing Phone (1) allows for smoother multitasking and better handling of demanding apps.
Camera
Rear Camera50MP (wide) + 50MP (ultrawide)50MP (wide) + 5MP (ultrawide) + 2MP (macro)Nothing Phone (1) uses a higher-resolution ultrawide sensor potentially offering better image quality. Galaxy M15 has a dedicated macro lens but lower ultrawide resolution.
Selfie Camera16MP13MPMinor difference in resolution; real-world selfie quality depends on processing and software.
Video4K@30fps, 1080p@60fps with EIS1080p@30fps with EISNothing Phone (1) offers higher resolution video recording and potentially better stabilization at higher frame rates.
Battery Life
Capacity4500 mAh6000 mAhGalaxy M15 has significantly larger battery capacity, likely translating to longer usage time.
Charging33W wired, 15W wireless25W wiredGalaxy M15 charges slower; Nothing Phone (1) supports faster wired and wireless charging.

2. Key Insights

  • Performance: Both phones should handle everyday tasks with ease. However, the Nothing Phone (1)'s potentially superior GPU and larger RAM options might give it an edge in gaming and heavy multitasking.
  • Display: The Nothing Phone (1)'s brighter display and slightly higher refresh rate provide a more premium visual experience.
  • Camera: While megapixel counts are similar for the main cameras, the Nothing Phone (1)'s higher quality ultrawide sensor and 4K video recording capabilities distinguish it. The Galaxy M15 offers a dedicated macro lens, though its practical usefulness depends on individual needs.
  • Battery: The Galaxy M15 boasts a significantly larger battery for extended usage. However, the Nothing Phone (1) offers faster wired and wireless charging, potentially offsetting this advantage for some users.

3. User Profiles and Recommendations

  • Nothing Phone (1): Suited for users who prioritize performance, a premium display, faster charging, and a more compact design. Ideal for content consumption, mobile gaming, and those who value aesthetics.
  • Samsung Galaxy M15: Best for users who prioritize long battery life above all else. A good choice for those who are constantly on the go and need a phone that can last through extended periods without recharging.

4. Buying Decision Framework

  1. What matters most: battery life or performance/features? If battery life is paramount, the Galaxy M15 is the clear winner. If you prioritize performance, display quality, and faster charging, the Nothing Phone (1) is a better choice.
  2. What's your budget? Consider the price difference between the two phones and the value each offers for its price. The availability of different RAM and storage configurations also influences the final cost.
  3. What's your usage pattern? Heavy gamers, content creators, and multitaskers will appreciate the Nothing Phone (1)'s capabilities. Light users who primarily use their phones for communication and basic tasks might find the Galaxy M15's long battery life more appealing.

My Choice: Nothing Phone (1)

While the Galaxy M15's massive battery is tempting, I would choose the Nothing Phone (1). I prioritize a fluid user experience, a vibrant display, and fast charging. The Snapdragon 778G+, coupled with more RAM, promises better performance for demanding tasks and gaming. The superior display and faster charging further solidify my preference. While the battery is smaller, I find the trade-off acceptable for the overall enhanced experience. The more compact and premium design is also a significant factor in my decision. The unique aesthetic and the Glyph Interface, while not discussed here due to lack of information in the provided data, adds a layer of personality that appeals to me.

Alex Griffin
Alex Griffin

Technology analyst specializing in mobile devices and consumer electronics.

Core Expertise

  • Mobile technology analysis
  • Consumer electronics evaluation
  • Technical specification interpretation
  • User experience insights

Professional Mission Empowering readers to make informed technology decisions by transforming intricate specifications into understandable, practical guidance.

Demystifying technology, one device at a time.