Nothing Phone (1) vs Samsung Galaxy A55 - Detailed Phone Comparison

Detailed Comparison

Specification

General

Launch Date July 16, 2022 March 15, 2024
Release Year 2022 2024

Physical

Volume 100.16 cm³ 102.25 cm³
Screen Size to Weight Ratio 3.39 "/g 3.1 "/g
Weight 193.5 g 213 g
Height 159.2 mm 161.1 mm
Width 75.8 mm 77.4 mm
Thickness 8.3 mm 8.2 mm
Foldable Design No No
Available Colors
  • Black
  • White
  • Navy
  • Iceblue
  • Lilac
  • Lemon

Display

Screen Size 6.55 " 6.6 "
Resolution 1080 x 2400 1080 x 2340
Aspect Ratio 20:9 19.5:9
Screen-to-Body Ratio 85.8 % 85.8 %
Pixel Density 402 PPI 390 PPI
Refresh Rate 120 Hz 120 Hz
Typical Brightness 500 nits N/A
HBM Brightness N/A 1000 nits
Peak Brightness 1200 nits N/A

Hardware

Battery Capacity per Screen Area 104.89 mAh/in² 114.78 mAh/in²
Battery Density 44.93 mAh/cm³ 48.9 mAh/cm³
Battery Capacity 4500 mAh 5000 mAh
NFC Support Yes Yes
Chipset Qualcomm SM7325-AE Snapdragon 778G+ 5G (6 nm) Exynos 1480 (4 nm)
CPU Octa-core (1x2.5 GHz Cortex-A78 & 3x2.4 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x1.9 GHz Cortex-A55) Octa-core (4x2.75 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55)
GPU Adreno 642L Xclipse 530

Connectivity

USB Version 2.0 2.0
OTG Support 1 1
DisplayPort
DisplayPort Version N/A N/A
USB Features USB Type-C 2.0, OTG USB Type-C 2.0, OTG

Software

Operating System Android Android
Initial OS Version 12 14
Maximum OS Version 15 18

Comparison Summary

Nothing Phone (1) vs. Samsung Galaxy A55: A Deep Dive

Let's dissect the Nothing Phone (1) and the Samsung Galaxy A55, two compelling mid-range contenders, to see which one comes out on top. We'll go beyond the spec sheet and delve into what these numbers really mean for you.

1. Specifications Breakdown

FeatureNothing Phone (1)Samsung Galaxy A55Real-World Implications
Design
Dimensions (mm)159.2 x 75.8 x 8.3161.1 x 77.4 x 8.2A55 slightly larger; negligible difference in hand feel.
Weight (g)193.5213A55 noticeably heavier, might impact extended use comfort.
Display
TypeOLED, 120Hz, HDR10+Super AMOLED, 120Hz, HDR10+Both offer vibrant colors, smooth scrolling, excellent contrast. Subtle differences in color science might be noticeable to some.
Size (inches)6.556.6A55 slightly larger screen estate for media consumption.
Resolution1080 x 24001080 x 2340Virtually identical sharpness.
Peak Brightness1200 nits1000 nitsNothing Phone (1) potentially more visible in direct sunlight.
Performance
ChipsetSnapdragon 778G+ (6nm)Exynos 1480 (4nm)A55's newer 4nm process suggests better power efficiency. Performance differences likely minimal for average daily tasks.
CPUOcta-core (1x2.5 GHz, 3x2.4 GHz, 4x1.9 GHz)Octa-core (4x2.75 GHz, 4x2.0 GHz)A55's higher clocked cores potentially give it an edge in demanding applications and multitasking.
GPUAdreno 642LXclipse 530Gaming performance likely comparable, though A55's newer architecture might offer minor advantages in future-proofing.
RAM8GB/12GB8GB/12GBBoth offer ample RAM for smooth multitasking.
Camera
Main Sensor50MP Sony IMX76650MP Sony IMX906A55's IMX906 is newer and potentially offers better low-light performance and overall image quality.
Ultrawide50MP Samsung S5KJN113MP Sony IMX258Nothing Phone (1) boasts a higher resolution ultrawide, but sensor quality and resulting images need real-world comparison.
Selfie16MP Sony IMX47132MP Sony IMX616A55's higher resolution selfie camera suggests sharper detail.
Battery Life
Capacity4500 mAh5000 mAhA55's larger battery likely translates to longer usage time.
Charging33W Wired, 15W Wireless25W WiredNothing Phone (1) offers faster wired and adds wireless charging.

2. Key Insights

  • Performance Parity: While the A55 boasts newer silicon, everyday performance for both phones will likely feel very similar. Heavier users might appreciate the A55's potentially stronger CPU for multitasking.
  • Camera Showdown: The A55's main camera sensor is a generation newer and should deliver superior image quality, especially in low light. The Nothing Phone (1)'s higher resolution ultrawide is intriguing but needs real-world testing.
  • Battery & Charging: The A55's larger battery capacity suggests longer endurance. However, the Nothing Phone (1)'s faster wired charging and the inclusion of wireless charging are significant advantages for convenience.
  • Software Experience: The Nothing Phone (1)'s near-stock Android experience with unique glyph interface is a differentiator. Samsung's One UI offers a more feature-rich, but potentially more bloated, software experience.

3. User Profiles and Recommendations

  • Nothing Phone (1): Appeals to users who value a unique design, clean software, fast and wireless charging, and a good overall balance of features.
  • Samsung Galaxy A55: Best suited for users prioritizing battery life, potentially superior camera quality, and a longer software support window (Samsung typically provides more OS updates).

4. Buying Decision Framework

  • How important is battery life to you? If all-day endurance is paramount, the A55 is likely the better choice.
  • Do you value wireless charging? This is a clear win for the Nothing Phone (1).
  • Which software experience do you prefer? Clean and minimal (Nothing Phone (1)) or feature-rich (Samsung A55)?

My Choice: The Samsung Galaxy A55

While the Nothing Phone (1)'s unique design and faster/wireless charging are tempting, I prioritize camera quality and battery life. The newer main camera sensor in the A55, combined with the significantly larger battery, ultimately sway my decision. Samsung's longer software update track record is a bonus, ensuring the device remains secure and up-to-date for a longer period. While I appreciate the Nothing Phone's cleaner Android experience, the A55's potential camera and battery advantages are more compelling for my personal needs.

Alex Griffin
Alex Griffin

Technology analyst specializing in mobile devices and consumer electronics.

Core Expertise

  • Mobile technology analysis
  • Consumer electronics evaluation
  • Technical specification interpretation
  • User experience insights

Professional Mission Empowering readers to make informed technology decisions by transforming intricate specifications into understandable, practical guidance.

Demystifying technology, one device at a time.