Nothing Phone (1) vs Oppo Reno12 - Detailed Phone Comparison

Detailed Comparison

Specification

General

Launch Date July 16, 2022 June 25, 2024
Release Year 2022 2024

Physical

Volume 100.16 cm³ 90.89 cm³
Screen Size to Weight Ratio 3.39 "/g 3.79 "/g
Weight 193.5 g 177 g
Height 159.2 mm 161.4 mm
Width 75.8 mm 74.1 mm
Thickness 8.3 mm 7.6 mm
Foldable Design No No
Available Colors
  • Black
  • White
  • Matte Brown
  • Sunset Pink
  • Astro Silver

Display

Screen Size 6.55 " 6.7 "
Resolution 1080 x 2400 1080 x 2412
Aspect Ratio 20:9 20:9
Screen-to-Body Ratio 85.8 % 90.3 %
Pixel Density 402 PPI 394 PPI
Refresh Rate 120 Hz 120 Hz
Typical Brightness 500 nits N/A
HBM Brightness N/A N/A
Peak Brightness 1200 nits 1200 nits

Hardware

Battery Capacity per Screen Area 104.89 mAh/in² 111.38 mAh/in²
Battery Density 44.93 mAh/cm³ 55.01 mAh/cm³
Battery Capacity 4500 mAh 5000 mAh
NFC Support Yes Yes
Chipset Qualcomm SM7325-AE Snapdragon 778G+ 5G (6 nm) Mediatek Dimensity 7300 Energy (4 nm)
CPU Octa-core (1x2.5 GHz Cortex-A78 & 3x2.4 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x1.9 GHz Cortex-A55) Octa-core (4x2.5 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55)
GPU Adreno 642L Mali-G615 MC2

Connectivity

USB Version 2.0 2.0
OTG Support 1 1
DisplayPort
DisplayPort Version N/A N/A
USB Features USB Type-C 2.0, OTG USB Type-C 2.0, OTG

Software

Operating System Android Android
Initial OS Version 12 14
Maximum OS Version 15 17

Comparison Summary

Nothing Phone (1) vs Oppo Reno12: A Deep Dive

Let's dissect the Nothing Phone (1) and the Oppo Reno12, going beyond the spec sheet to understand what these devices offer in the real world.

1. Specifications Breakdown

FeatureNothing Phone (1)Oppo Reno12Real-World Implications
Design
Dimensions (mm)159.2 x 75.8 x 8.3161.4 x 74.1 x 7.6Reno12 is slightly larger but thinner.
Weight (g)193.5177Reno12 feels noticeably lighter in hand.
Display
Size (inches)6.556.7Reno12 offers a slightly larger viewing area.
Resolution (px)1080 x 24001080 x 2412Virtually identical sharpness; both are crisp.
Panel TypeOLEDAMOLEDExpect vibrant colors and deep blacks from both.
Refresh Rate (Hz)120120Smooth scrolling and responsive gaming on both.
Peak Brightness (nits)12001400Reno12 might be slightly more visible in direct sunlight.
Performance
ChipsetSnapdragon 778G+Dimensity 7300Comparable performance, but benchmarks needed for definitive answer.
CPUOcta-core (1x2.5 GHz A78 & 3x2.4 GHz A78 & 4x1.9 GHz A55)Octa-core (4x2.5 GHz A78 & 4x2.0 GHz A55)Reno 12's CPU configuration hints at potentially better multi-core performance.
RAM (GB)8/1212Reno12's 12GB RAM ensures smoother multitasking, especially with demanding apps.
Camera
Main Camera (MP)50 (Sony IMX766)50 (Sony LYT-600)Both use capable Sony sensors; image quality comparison requires real-world testing.
Ultrawide (MP)50 (Samsung JN1)8 (Sony IMX355)Nothing Phone (1) boasts a significantly higher resolution ultrawide.
Video4K@30fps4K@30fps + 1080p@480fpsReno12 offers more versatile slow-motion video recording.
Battery Life
Capacity (mAh)45005000Reno12's larger battery likely translates to longer usage time.
Fast Charging (W)3380Reno12 charges significantly faster.

2. Key Insights

  • Performance: Both phones offer mid-range performance, but the Reno12's Dimensity 7300 and 12GB RAM configuration suggest a potential edge in multitasking and demanding tasks. Real-world benchmarks are needed to confirm this. The Nothing Phone (1)'s Snapdragon 778G+ is no slouch, however, and should handle everyday tasks with ease.
  • Camera: The megapixel count suggests a tie for the main cameras, but sensor performance varies greatly. The Nothing Phone (1) dramatically outclasses the Reno12 in ultrawide photography with its 50MP sensor compared to Reno12's 8MP. The Reno12, however, wins in slow-motion video recording capabilities.
  • Battery: The Reno12 boasts a larger battery and significantly faster charging, making it the clear winner in this category. The Nothing Phone (1)'s lack of a charger in the box is also a consideration.
  • Design & Display: Both phones feature attractive OLED displays with 120Hz refresh rates. The Reno12 is slightly larger, thinner, and lighter, which might appeal to some users.

3. User Profiles and Recommendations

  • Nothing Phone (1): For users who prioritize a unique design, a standout ultrawide camera experience, and a clean Android experience. Good for photography enthusiasts who don't need the absolute fastest charging.
  • Oppo Reno12: Best suited for users who value battery life, fast charging, and a sleek, lightweight design. Ideal for power users or those who dislike frequent charging.

4. Buying Decision Framework

  • How important is battery life and charging speed to you? If it's crucial, the Reno12 is the winner.
  • Are you a heavy multitasker or mobile gamer? The Reno12's 12GB RAM might provide a smoother experience.
  • Do you prioritize camera quality, especially ultrawide shots? The Nothing Phone (1) significantly outperforms in this area.

My Choice: I would choose the Oppo Reno12. While the Nothing Phone (1) has a compelling ultrawide camera, the Reno12's superior battery life, significantly faster charging, and sleek design are more important to me in a daily driver. As a tech journalist, I'm always on the go, and the Reno12's combination of performance and all-day battery makes it a more practical choice for my needs. The leap in charging speeds from 33W to 80W is also a huge convenience factor.

Alex Griffin
Alex Griffin

Technology analyst specializing in mobile devices and consumer electronics.

Core Expertise

  • Mobile technology analysis
  • Consumer electronics evaluation
  • Technical specification interpretation
  • User experience insights

Professional Mission Empowering readers to make informed technology decisions by transforming intricate specifications into understandable, practical guidance.

Demystifying technology, one device at a time.