Nothing Phone (1) vs Nothing Phone (2a) - Detailed Phone Comparison

Detailed Comparison

Specification

General

Launch Date July 16, 2022 March 12, 2024
Release Year 2022 2024

Physical

Volume 100.16 cm³ 106.1 cm³
Screen Size to Weight Ratio 3.39 "/g 3.53 "/g
Weight 193.5 g 190 g
Height 159.2 mm 161.7 mm
Width 75.8 mm 76.3 mm
Thickness 8.3 mm 8.6 mm
Foldable Design No No
Available Colors
  • Black
  • White
  • Black
  • Blue
  • White
  • Milk

Display

Screen Size 6.55 " 6.7 "
Resolution 1080 x 2400 1080 x 2412
Aspect Ratio 20:9 20:9
Screen-to-Body Ratio 85.8 % 87.6 %
Pixel Density 402 PPI 394 PPI
Refresh Rate 120 Hz 120 Hz
Typical Brightness 500 nits 700 nits
HBM Brightness N/A 1100 nits
Peak Brightness 1200 nits 1300 nits

Hardware

Battery Capacity per Screen Area 104.89 mAh/in² 111.38 mAh/in²
Battery Density 44.93 mAh/cm³ 47.12 mAh/cm³
Battery Capacity 4500 mAh 5000 mAh
NFC Support Yes Yes
Chipset Qualcomm SM7325-AE Snapdragon 778G+ 5G (6 nm) Mediatek Dimensity 7200 Pro (4 nm)
CPU Octa-core (1x2.5 GHz Cortex-A78 & 3x2.4 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x1.9 GHz Cortex-A55) Octa-core (2x2.8 GHz Cortex-A715 & 6x 2.0 Cortex-A510)
GPU Adreno 642L Mali-G610 MC4

Connectivity

USB Version 2.0 2.0
OTG Support 1 1
DisplayPort
DisplayPort Version N/A N/A
USB Features USB Type-C 2.0, OTG USB Type-C 2.0, OTG

Software

Operating System Android Android
Initial OS Version 12 14
Maximum OS Version 15 17

Comparison Summary

Nothing Phone (1) vs. Nothing Phone (2a): A Comparative Analysis

The smartphone landscape is constantly evolving, and Nothing has made a splash with its unique design philosophy and focus on user experience. Let's dissect the Nothing Phone (1) and the newer Nothing Phone (2a), comparing their technical specifications and uncovering their real-world implications.

1. Specifications Breakdown

FeatureNothing Phone (1)Nothing Phone (2a)Real-World Implications
Design
Dimensions (mm)159.2 x 75.8 x 8.3161.7 x 76.3 x 8.6(2a) slightly larger and thicker, potentially less pocketable.
Weight (g)193.5190Negligible difference in weight; both feel relatively light.
Display
TypeOLED, 120Hz, HDR10+AMOLED, 120Hz, HDR10+Both offer vibrant colors, smooth scrolling, and HDR support. AMOLED on the (2a) potentially offers deeper blacks.
Size6.55"6.7"(2a) has a slightly larger display, offering more screen real estate.
Peak Brightness1200 nits1300 nits(2a) slightly brighter, improving outdoor visibility.
Performance
ChipsetSnapdragon 778G+ 5G (6nm)MediaTek Dimensity 7200 Pro (4 nm)(2a) likely offers improved performance and efficiency due to newer and more powerful processor built on a smaller node.
CPUOcta-core (1x2.5 GHz + 3x2.4 GHz…)Octa-core (2x2.8 GHz + 6x2.0 GHz…)(2a) boasts higher clock speeds, suggesting better multi-tasking and demanding application performance.
GPUAdreno 642LMali-G610 MC4GPU performance comparison requires real-world benchmarks, but Mali is generally considered slightly behind Adreno.
RAM8GB/12GB8GB/12GBBoth offer ample RAM for smooth multitasking.
Camera
Main Sensor50MP Sony IMX76650MP Samsung GN9Both have high-resolution sensors; real-world image quality depends on processing. (2a) may offer better low-light.
Selfie Camera16MP Sony IMX47132MP Sony IMX615(2a) has a significantly higher resolution selfie camera.
Video4K@30fps, 1080p@60fps4K@30fps, 1080p@120fps(2a) can record slow-motion video at higher frame rates.
Battery Life
Capacity4500 mAh5000 mAh(2a) has a larger battery capacity, promising longer usage time.
Fast Charging33W45W(2a) supports faster charging.

2. Key Insights

  • Performance: The Phone (2a)'s Dimensity 7200 Pro and faster CPU cores suggest a noticeable performance advantage over the Phone (1)'s Snapdragon 778G+, particularly in demanding tasks and gaming.
  • Battery: The Phone (2a)'s larger battery and faster charging should translate to significantly longer usage time and quicker top-ups.
  • Camera: While both phones boast impressive camera hardware, the Phone (2a)'s upgraded selfie camera and higher slow-motion video capabilities give it an edge for content creators.
  • Display: While both are excellent, the (2a) with a slightly larger and brighter AMOLED should provide a more immersive viewing experience.

3. User Profiles and Recommendations

  • Phone (1): Suitable for users seeking a stylish, well-rounded phone with a good balance of performance, camera quality, and battery life at a potentially lower price point.
  • Phone (2a): Ideal for users prioritizing performance, battery life, and camera capabilities, especially for content creation and gaming. The larger and brighter display is also a plus for media consumption.

4. Buying Decision Framework

  1. What is your budget? The Phone (1) may be more affordable.
  2. What are your primary use cases? Gamers and content creators would appreciate the Phone (2a)'s extra power and camera features.
  3. How important is battery life? The Phone (2a)'s larger battery and faster charging are significant advantages.

My Choice: I would choose the Nothing Phone (2a). The performance gains from the newer processor, coupled with the larger battery and faster charging, are compelling. The improved selfie camera and higher slow-motion video recording are also valuable additions for someone who frequently documents experiences. While the Phone (1) is a solid device, the (2a) represents a meaningful upgrade in key areas that enhance daily usage. The slightly larger display is a nice bonus as well.

Alex Griffin
Alex Griffin

Technology analyst specializing in mobile devices and consumer electronics.

Core Expertise

  • Mobile technology analysis
  • Consumer electronics evaluation
  • Technical specification interpretation
  • User experience insights

Professional Mission Empowering readers to make informed technology decisions by transforming intricate specifications into understandable, practical guidance.

Demystifying technology, one device at a time.