Nokia XR20 vs ZTE Axon 40 Ultra - Detailed Phone Comparison

Detailed Comparison

Specification
Nokia XR20
Nokia XR20
Nokia

General

Launch Date August 4, 2021 May 13, 2022
Release Year 2021 2022

Physical

Volume 148.25 cm³ 100.96 cm³
Screen Size to Weight Ratio 2.69 "/g 3.33 "/g
Weight 248 g 204 g
Height 171.6 mm 163.3 mm
Width 81.5 mm 73.6 mm
Thickness 10.6 mm 8.4 mm
Foldable Design No No
Available Colors
  • Ultra Blue
  • Granite Gray
  • Silver
  • Gold
  • Black

Display

Screen Size 6.67 " 6.8 "
Resolution 1080 x 2400 1116 x 2480
Aspect Ratio 20:9 20:9
Screen-to-Body Ratio 76.8 % 92.9 %
Pixel Density 395 PPI 400 PPI
Refresh Rate N/A 120 Hz
Typical Brightness 550 nits N/A
HBM Brightness N/A N/A
Peak Brightness N/A 1500 nits

Hardware

Battery Capacity per Screen Area 104.07 mAh/in² 108.13 mAh/in²
Battery Density 31.23 mAh/cm³ 49.53 mAh/cm³
Battery Capacity 4630 mAh 5000 mAh
NFC Support Yes Yes
Chipset Qualcomm SM4350 Snapdragon 480 5G (8 nm) Qualcomm SM8450 Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 (4 nm)
CPU Octa-core (2x2.0 GHz Kryo 460 & 6x1.8 GHz Kryo 460) Octa-core (1x3.00 GHz Cortex-X2 & 3x2.50 GHz Cortex-A710 & 4x1.80 GHz Cortex-A510)
GPU Adreno 619 Adreno 730

Connectivity

USB Version 3.0 3.1
OTG Support 1
DisplayPort
DisplayPort Version N/A N/A
USB Features USB Type-C 3.0 USB Type-C 3.1, OTG

Software

Operating System Android Android
Initial OS Version 11 12
Maximum OS Version 13 13

Comparison Summary

Alright, let's dive into a detailed comparison of the Nokia XR20 and the ZTE Axon 40 Ultra. Think of this as a discussion with a tech-savvy friend, breaking down what each phone offers and how it translates into real-world usage.

Nokia XR20 vs. ZTE Axon 40 Ultra: A Deep Dive

Here’s a comprehensive look at how these two phones stack up.

1. Specifications Breakdown

FeatureNokia XR20ZTE Axon 40 UltraReal-World Implications
Design
Dimensions171.6 × 81.5 × 10.6 mm163.3 × 73.6 × 8.4 mmXR20 is bulkier, harder to handle one-handed. Axon 40 Ultra is slimmer and more pocketable.
Weight248g204gXR20 feels heavier; Axon 40 Ultra is more comfortable for extended use.
Build QualityCorning Gorilla Glass VictusUnknownXR20 has a more durable screen against drops and scratches.
Display
Size6.67"6.8"Axon 40 Ultra offers a slightly larger viewing area.
Resolution1080x24001116x2480Axon 40 Ultra has slightly sharper visuals.
TechnologyIPS LCDAMOLEDAxon 40 Ultra offers deeper blacks, better contrast, and more vibrant colors.
Refresh Rate60Hz120HzAxon 40 Ultra provides smoother scrolling and animations.
Brightness0 nits1500 nitsAxon 40 Ultra is much more visible in bright sunlight. (Note: The XR20 brightness is likely a data error, but relatively lower than the Axon)
Performance
ChipsetQualcomm SM4350 Snapdragon 480 5G (8 nm)Qualcomm SM8450 Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 (4 nm)Axon 40 Ultra is significantly faster, offering better app loading, multitasking, and gaming.
AnTuTu Score320,0001,061,300Axon 40 Ultra handles demanding tasks with ease; XR20 may struggle with heavy apps and games.
GPUAdreno 619Adreno 730Axon 40 Ultra provides much better graphics performance for gaming and video editing.
Camera
Main Camera48MP, f/1.864MP, f/1.6, Sony IMX787Axon 40 Ultra captures more detailed and brighter images in various lighting conditions.
Selfie Camera8MP, f/2.016MP, f/2.0, OmnivisionAxon 40 Ultra takes higher resolution and potentially clearer selfies.
Telephoto LensNone64MP, f/3.5, Omnivision OV64BAxon 40 Ultra offers optical zoom capabilities for distant subjects.
Wide Angle Lens13MP, f/2.4NoneXR20 allows for wider field-of-view shots in landscapes or group photos.
Video1080p@30fps8K@30fps, 4K@120fpsAxon 40 Ultra records much higher quality and smoother videos, suitable for professional use.
FeaturesDigital image stabilizationOptical Stabilization (OIS), Laser autofocus (LAF), Under display camera, RAW, Night ModeAxon 40 Ultra has superior camera features for versatile shooting scenarios.
Battery Life
Capacity4630mAh5000mAhAxon 40 Ultra potentially lasts slightly longer on a single charge.
Charging18W fast charging65W fast chargingAxon 40 Ultra charges much faster, reducing downtime.
Wireless Charging15WNoneXR20 offers the convenience of wireless charging.
Software
OSAndroid 11 (upgradable to 13)Android 12 (upgradable to 13)Axon 40 Ultra starts with a slightly newer Android version.
Storage & Memory
Internal Storage64/128GB128/256/512/1024GBAxon 40 Ultra offers significantly more storage options for apps, media, and files.
RAM4/6GB8/12/16/18GBAxon 40 Ultra handles multitasking and memory-intensive tasks more efficiently.
Expandable StorageNoNoNeither phone allows for storage expansion.
Connectivity
Wi-FiWi-Fi 6Wi-Fi 6Both offer modern Wi-Fi standards.
Bluetooth5.05.2Axon 40 Ultra has a slightly newer Bluetooth version.
GPSGPS, A-GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, QZSS, Galileo, NavIC SystemGPS, A-GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS (L1)XR20 has more satellite systems and slightly better GPS.
Audio
SpeakersStereo SpeakersDTS / DTS X, Stereo SpeakersAxon 40 Ultra offers potentially better audio quality and surround sound.
Microphones23Axon 40 Ultra offers better audio separation and immersion.
Security
BiometricsSide-mounted fingerprint sensorBasic fingerprint sensorXR20 features a more advanced side-mounted fingerprint sensor.
Other
SensorsAccelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Proximity, BarometerAccelerometer, Gyroscope, ProximityXR20 has a Barometer for environmental sensing.

2. Key Insights

Nokia XR20 Strengths:

  • Durability: With its Corning Gorilla Glass Victus and rugged design, the XR20 is built to withstand drops and harsh conditions.
  • Wireless Charging: Offers convenient wireless charging, a feature missing in the Axon 40 Ultra.
  • GPS Accuracy: Supports a wider array of satellite systems, potentially providing more accurate location data.
  • Price: Likely more budget-friendly.

ZTE Axon 40 Ultra Strengths:

  • Performance: The Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 chipset provides significantly better performance for gaming, multitasking, and demanding applications.
  • Display: The AMOLED display with a 120Hz refresh rate offers a superior visual experience with vibrant colors, deep blacks, and smooth animations.
  • Camera System: Boasts a versatile camera system with higher resolution sensors, optical zoom, and advanced features like OIS, LAF, and RAW support.
  • Charging Speed: The 65W fast charging dramatically reduces charging times.
  • Storage and Memory: Offers more generous storage and RAM options for power users.
  • Under-Display Camera: Provides a truly immersive, notch-free display.

Trade-offs and Limitations:

  • Nokia XR20: The older chipset limits performance, and the IPS LCD display is less vibrant than the AMOLED on the Axon 40 Ultra. The camera system is also less capable.
  • ZTE Axon 40 Ultra: Lacks wireless charging and the rugged durability of the XR20. Its under-display camera, while innovative, may not match the quality of traditional selfie cameras in some lighting conditions.

3. User Profiles and Recommendations

  • Nokia XR20:

    • Ideal for: Users who prioritize durability and ruggedness over raw performance. Great for outdoor enthusiasts, construction workers, or anyone prone to dropping their phone.
    • Use Cases: Construction sites, hiking trails, areas where drops and impacts are likely.
  • ZTE Axon 40 Ultra:

    • Ideal for: Users who want a premium multimedia and gaming experience. Great for content creators, photographers, and power users who demand high performance.
    • Use Cases: Photography, video editing, gaming, and consuming media on the go.

4. Buying Decision Framework

Here are three questions to guide your choice:

  1. How important is durability? If you need a phone that can withstand a beating, the XR20 is the clear choice.
  2. What will you primarily use the phone for? If gaming, photography, and media consumption are key, the Axon 40 Ultra excels.
  3. What is your budget? The XR20 is likely the more affordable option, but the Axon 40 Ultra offers a significant upgrade in features and performance.

Scenario-Based Recommendations:

  • Scenario 1: Adventure Seeker - Choose the Nokia XR20 for its ruggedness and reliable GPS.
  • Scenario 2: Mobile Gamer - Choose the ZTE Axon 40 Ultra for its powerful processor, smooth display, and ample RAM.
  • Scenario 3: Budget-Conscious User - Choose the Nokia XR20 for its affordability and decent performance for everyday tasks.

Final Recommendation

If I were choosing between these two phones, I would personally pick the ZTE Axon 40 Ultra.

Why I Would Choose the ZTE Axon 40 Ultra:

  • Superior Performance: As someone who uses their phone for a variety of tasks, including gaming and content creation, the Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 offers a massive performance advantage.
  • Exceptional Display: I value a high-quality display for media consumption, and the AMOLED screen with a 120Hz refresh rate on the Axon 40 Ultra is simply stunning.
  • Versatile Camera System: Photography is a hobby of mine, and the Axon 40 Ultra's camera setup provides more flexibility and higher image quality.
  • Faster Charging: I appreciate the convenience of fast charging, especially when I'm on the go.

While I acknowledge that the Nokia XR20 offers superior durability and wireless charging, the overall package of the ZTE Axon 40 Ultra, with its performance, display, and camera capabilities, aligns better with my needs and preferences.

Alex Griffin
Alex Griffin

Technology analyst specializing in mobile devices and consumer electronics.

Core Expertise

  • Mobile technology analysis
  • Consumer electronics evaluation
  • Technical specification interpretation
  • User experience insights

Professional Mission Empowering readers to make informed technology decisions by transforming intricate specifications into understandable, practical guidance.

Demystifying technology, one device at a time.