Nokia XR20 vs Samsung Galaxy M35 - Detailed Phone Comparison

Detailed Comparison

Specification
Nokia XR20
Nokia XR20
Nokia

General

Launch Date August 4, 2021 May 24, 2024
Release Year 2021 2024

Physical

Volume 148.25 cm³ 116.09 cm³
Screen Size to Weight Ratio 2.69 "/g 2.97 "/g
Weight 248 g 222 g
Height 171.6 mm 162.3 mm
Width 81.5 mm 78.6 mm
Thickness 10.6 mm 9.1 mm
Foldable Design No No
Available Colors
  • Ultra Blue
  • Granite Gray
  • Gray
  • Light Blue
  • Dark Blue

Display

Screen Size 6.67 " 6.6 "
Resolution 1080 x 2400 1080 x 2340
Aspect Ratio 20:9 19.5:9
Screen-to-Body Ratio 76.8 % 83.8 %
Pixel Density 395 PPI 390 PPI
Refresh Rate N/A 120 Hz
Typical Brightness 550 nits N/A
HBM Brightness N/A 1000 nits
Peak Brightness N/A N/A

Hardware

Battery Capacity per Screen Area 104.07 mAh/in² 137.74 mAh/in²
Battery Density 31.23 mAh/cm³ 51.69 mAh/cm³
Battery Capacity 4630 mAh 6000 mAh
NFC Support Yes Yes
Chipset Qualcomm SM4350 Snapdragon 480 5G (8 nm) Exynos 1380 (5 nm)
CPU Octa-core (2x2.0 GHz Kryo 460 & 6x1.8 GHz Kryo 460) Octa-core (4x2.4 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55)
GPU Adreno 619 Mali-G68 MP5

Connectivity

USB Version 3.0 2.0
OTG Support 1
DisplayPort
DisplayPort Version N/A N/A
USB Features USB Type-C 3.0 USB Type-C 2.0, OTG

Software

Operating System Android Android
Initial OS Version 11 14
Maximum OS Version 13

Comparison Summary

Alright, let's break down the Nokia XR20 versus the Samsung Galaxy M35. As a tech journalist, I always aim to translate specs into real-world experiences so you can make the right choice.

1. Specifications Breakdown

Here's a detailed look at the key specs, laid out for easy comparison:

FeatureNokia XR20Samsung Galaxy M35Real-World Implications
Design
Dimensions171.6 x 81.5 x 10.6 mm, 248g162.3 x 78.6 x 9.1 mm, 222gThe M35 is noticeably lighter and more compact, making it easier to handle and pocket. The XR20, while bulkier, might feel more robust (more on that later).
Build QualityGorilla Glass VictusGorilla Glass VictusBoth offer excellent screen protection against scratches and drops.
Display
Size6.67"6.6"Negligible difference in size. Both offer a comfortable viewing experience.
TechnologyIPS LCDAMOLEDAMOLED on the M35 means richer colors, deeper blacks, and potentially better battery life, especially with dark mode enabled.
Resolution1080x24001080x2340Both are sharp enough for everyday use; the difference is minimal.
Refresh Rate60Hz120HzThe M35's 120Hz display will feel significantly smoother when scrolling and gaming. It makes a surprising difference in daily use.
Brightness0 nits0 nitsPeak brightness is the same
Performance
ChipsetSnapdragon 480 5G (8 nm)Exynos 1380 (5 nm)The Exynos 1380 in the M35 is significantly faster. Expect smoother multitasking, quicker app launches, and better gaming performance.
Antutu Score320,000578,500Confirms the real-world performance difference. The M35 has a substantial performance advantage.
GPUAdreno 619Mali-G68 MP5The Mali-G68 MP5 in the M35 offers better graphics performance, crucial for gaming and other graphically intensive tasks.
Camera
Main Camera48MP f/1.850MP f/1.8 (Sony LYT-600, 1/2", 1.00 µm)On paper, both are similar, but sensor size and model matters. The M35's Sony LYT-600 will likely produce better images in low light and overall. Also slightly larger pixel sizes.
Selfie Camera8MP f/2.013MP f/2.2The M35's higher resolution selfie camera will capture more detailed self-portraits.
Wide Angle Lens13MP f/2.48MP f/2.2The Nokia XR20's wide-angle lens has a higher resolution, but Samsung's wider apperature will let more light in.
Macro Lensnull2MP f/2.4Samsung Galaxy M35 can take macro shots
Video1080p@30fps4K@30fps, 1080p@60fps w/ EISThe M35 wins hands-down. 4K recording and electronic image stabilization (EIS) make for much more professional-looking videos.
FeaturesDigital zoom, Dual camera2x2 OCL, Pro Video Mode, 4K Video, Digital zoom, Triple camera, Digital image stabilization, Optical Stabilization (OIS), Ultra stable video, AutoFraming, All Pixel Omni- Directional PDAF, NPU AI Engine, Continuous shooting, Geotagging, Panorama, HDR, Face detection, White balance settings, ISO settings, Exposure compensation, Scene mode, Self-timer, Night Mode, RAW 12 bits, DOL HDRThe M35 has many more features to work with
Battery Life
Capacity4630mAh6000mAhThe M35's significantly larger battery should provide much longer battery life, often lasting well into a second day of moderate use.
Charging18W fast charging, Wireless 15W25W fast chargingThe M35 charges faster, but the XR20 offers the convenience of wireless charging.
Software
OSAndroid 11, Upgradable to 13Android 14The M35 ships with a more recent version of Android, offering the latest features and security updates. The XR20 is stuck on Android 13.
Other
Storage64/128 GB128/256 GBThe M35 offers more built-in storage, which is important since neither phone has expandable storage.
RAM4/6 GB6/8 GBMore RAM in the M35 translates to smoother multitasking and less lag when switching between apps.
AudioStereo, 2 micsStereo, Dolby Atmos, Hi-ResThe M35 has better audio quality.
GPSGPS, A-GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, QZSS, Galileo, NavIC SystemGPS, A-GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, QZSS, GalileoNokia XR20 supports more satellite systems for better location accuracy; Nokia XR20 additionally supports: NavIC System
SensorsBiometric: Fingerprint; Proximity: Proximity; Motion: Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope; Environmental: BarometerBiometric: Fingerprint; Motion: Accelerometer, Gyroscope; Proximity: Ultrasonic proximity virtualNokia XR20 includes additional environmental sensors; Nokia XR20 additionally features: Proximity, Compass, Barometer; Samsung Galaxy M35 additionally features: Hall, Geomagnetic, Ultrasonic proximity virtual

2. Key Insights

  • Samsung Galaxy M35 Strengths: Superior performance, better display, enhanced camera capabilities (especially video), longer battery life, newer software, better audio.
  • Nokia XR20 Strengths: Potentially more rugged (though not explicitly stated), wireless charging, and more GPS/location capabilities.

The M35 is the clear winner in most categories. Its faster processor, smoother display, and enhanced camera setup provide a vastly superior user experience.

The Nokia XR20 was launched in 2021. While it may have been rugged at the time, it's now old.

3. User Profiles and Recommendations

  • Samsung Galaxy M35: Best for users who prioritize performance, display quality, camera capabilities, and battery life. Ideal for everyday use, social media, photography, video recording, and gaming.
  • Nokia XR20: Best for users who need a basic smartphone and place a high value on wireless charging. The XR20 is suitable for undemanding tasks, and possibly for those who work in harsh conditions, but there are better phones for this these days.

4. Buying Decision Framework

Here are three questions to guide your decision:

  1. How important is performance to you? If you need a fast, responsive phone for gaming or demanding apps, the M35 is the better choice.
  2. Do you value camera quality, especially video? The M35's 4K recording and image stabilization offer a significant advantage.
  3. Is long battery life a priority? The M35's larger battery provides a substantial boost in endurance.

Recommendation

If I had to choose, I would pick the Samsung Galaxy M35 without hesitation. It offers a much better all-around experience, excelling in performance, display quality, camera capabilities, and battery life. While the Nokia XR20 has some advantages, the M35 delivers a superior package for most users. The Nokia XR20's time has passed.

Alex Griffin
Alex Griffin

Technology analyst specializing in mobile devices and consumer electronics.

Core Expertise

  • Mobile technology analysis
  • Consumer electronics evaluation
  • Technical specification interpretation
  • User experience insights

Professional Mission Empowering readers to make informed technology decisions by transforming intricate specifications into understandable, practical guidance.

Demystifying technology, one device at a time.