Nokia XR20 vs Motorola Razr 40 - Detailed Phone Comparison

Detailed Comparison

Specification
Nokia XR20
Nokia XR20
Nokia
Motorola Razr 40
Motorola Razr 40
Motorola

General

Launch Date August 4, 2021 June 21, 2023
Release Year 2021 2023

Physical

Volume 148.25 cm³ 93.53 cm³
Screen Size to Weight Ratio 2.69 "/g 3.66 "/g
Weight 248 g 188.6 g
Height 171.6 mm 170.8 mm
Width 81.5 mm 74 mm
Thickness 10.6 mm 7.4 mm
Foldable Design No Yes
Available Colors
  • Ultra Blue
  • Granite Gray
  • Sage Green
  • Vanilla Cream
  • Summer Lilac
  • Grape Compote
  • Cherry Blossom

Display

Screen Size 6.67 " 6.9 "
Resolution 1080 x 2400 1080 x 2640
Aspect Ratio 20:9 22:9
Screen-to-Body Ratio 76.8 % 85.2 %
Pixel Density 395 PPI 413 PPI
Refresh Rate N/A 144 Hz
Typical Brightness 550 nits N/A
HBM Brightness N/A N/A
Peak Brightness N/A 1400 nits

Hardware

Battery Capacity per Screen Area 104.07 mAh/in² 88.22 mAh/in²
Battery Density 31.23 mAh/cm³ 44.91 mAh/cm³
Battery Capacity 4630 mAh 4200 mAh
NFC Support Yes Yes
Chipset Qualcomm SM4350 Snapdragon 480 5G (8 nm) Qualcomm SM7450-AB Snapdragon 7 Gen 1 (4 nm)
CPU Octa-core (2x2.0 GHz Kryo 460 & 6x1.8 GHz Kryo 460) Octa-core (1x2.4 GHz Cortex-A710 & 3x2.36 GHz Cortex-A710 & 4x1.8 GHz Cortex-A510)
GPU Adreno 619 Adreno 644

Connectivity

USB Version 3.0 2.0
OTG Support
DisplayPort
DisplayPort Version N/A N/A
USB Features USB Type-C 3.0 USB Type-C 2.0

Software

Operating System Android Android
Initial OS Version 11 13
Maximum OS Version 13 16

Comparison Summary

Alright, let's break down the Nokia XR20 and Motorola Razr 40. This is a classic clash of titans – rugged dependability versus cutting-edge style. Buckle up; it's going to be a detailed ride!

1. Specifications Breakdown

Here's a comprehensive breakdown of the key specifications, presented in a way that's not just about numbers, but about what those numbers mean for you:

FeatureNokia XR20Motorola Razr 40Real-World Implications
Design
Form FactorStandard smartphoneFoldable smartphoneThe Razr 40 offers portability and a unique user experience, while the XR20 prioritizes durability in a traditional format.
Dimensions171.6 x 81.5 x 10.6 mm170.8 x 74 x 7.4 mmThe Razr 40 is significantly slimmer and narrower, making it easier to hold and pocket. The XR20 is bulkier due to its rugged design.
Weight248g188.6gThe Razr 40 is noticeably lighter, enhancing comfort during prolonged use.
Build QualityRuggedizedPremium Glass & MetalXR20 is built to withstand drops, water, and dust. Razr 40 is more delicate but offers a higher-end aesthetic.
Display
Main Display Size6.67"6.9"The Razr 40 offers slightly more screen real estate for immersive viewing.
Resolution1080 x 24001080 x 2640The Razr 40 has a sharper display, resulting in slightly crisper images and text.
Pixel Density395 PPI413 PPIBoth are quite similar, so the difference will hardly be visible.
TechnologyIPS LCDThe IPS LCD of the Nokia XR20 will offer adequate colors and viewing angles.
Refresh Rate60Hz144HzThe Razr 40 provides dramatically smoother scrolling and animations, making the user experience feel more responsive.
Brightness0 nits1400 nitsRazr 40 is much better in direct sunlight.
Performance
ChipsetSnapdragon 480 5G (8nm)Snapdragon 7 Gen 1 (4nm)The Razr 40 offers significantly better performance, handling demanding apps and games with ease.
AnTuTu Score320,000699,600The Razr 40 provides a much snappier and more fluid user experience overall.
GPUAdreno 619Adreno 644The Razr 40 has a more powerful GPU, resulting in better graphics performance for gaming and other visually intensive tasks.
Camera
Main Camera48MP f/1.864MP f/1.8The Razr 40 can capture more detailed photos, especially in good lighting conditions.
Ultrawide Camera13MP f/2.413MP f/2.2 (Wide Angle + Macro)Razr 40's wide angle lens can also double as a Macro lens.
Selfie Camera8MP f/2.032MP f/2.45The Razr 40 captures significantly sharper and more detailed selfies.
Video Recording1080p@30fps4K@30fpsThe Razr 40 can record higher-resolution videos with better detail and clarity.
FeaturesHDROIS, Night Vision, 4k video, Time-LapseThe Razr 40 offers more advanced camera features, including optical image stabilization for smoother videos and night mode for better low-light photos.
Battery Life
Capacity4630mAh4200mAhThe XR20 potentially offers slightly longer battery life due to its larger battery, although real-world usage will vary.
Charging18W fast charging, 15W Wireless33W fast charging, 8W Wireless, Reverse chargingThe Razr 40 charges much faster and can also charge other devices wirelessly.
Software
Operating SystemAndroid 11 (upgradable to 13)Android 13 (upgradable to 16)The Razr 40 ships with a newer version of Android, offering the latest features and security updates and has better long term support.
Connectivity
Bluetooth5.05.3The Razr 40 has a more modern Bluetooth version for improved efficiency and stability.
SIMDual SIMDual SIM (Nano + eSIM)The Razr 40 offers the flexibility of using an eSIM for added convenience.
Storage
Internal Storage64GB/128GB128GB/256GBThe Razr 40 offers more internal storage, which is crucial since neither phone supports expandable storage.
RAM4GB/6GB8GB/12GBThe Razr 40 has significantly more RAM, resulting in smoother multitasking and better performance with demanding applications.
Other
AudioStereo SpeakersDolby Atmos, Stereo SpeakersRazr 40 offers an enhanced Audio experience with Dolby Atmos.
SensorsBarometerGravityNokia XR20 has a Barometer, while Motorola Razr 40 has a Gravity sensor.

2. Key Insights

  • Nokia XR20 - The Unbreakable: This phone is all about durability. It's built like a tank, ready to take a beating. If you work in tough environments, are accident-prone, or simply value longevity, this is your device. The key advantage is its ruggedness, not its raw performance.
  • Motorola Razr 40 - Style and Substance: The Razr 40 is a fashion statement packed with modern tech. Its foldable design is eye-catching, and it boasts a significantly more powerful processor, better cameras, and a smoother display than the XR20. However, this comes at the cost of fragility.

Trade-offs:

  • The XR20 sacrifices performance and camera quality for extreme durability.
  • The Razr 40 prioritizes performance and design but is more vulnerable to damage.

3. User Profiles and Recommendations

  • Nokia XR20:

    • Ideal for: Construction workers, outdoor adventurers, field technicians, anyone who needs a phone that can survive harsh conditions.
    • Use Cases: Surviving drops on concrete, operating in dusty environments, being used with wet hands, taking calls in noisy environments.
  • Motorola Razr 40:

    • Ideal for: Tech enthusiasts, fashion-conscious users, content creators, anyone who wants a unique and powerful smartphone experience.
    • Use Cases: Capturing high-quality photos and videos, multitasking between apps, enjoying smooth gaming, making a statement with a stylish device.

4. Buying Decision Framework

Here are three questions to help you decide:

  1. How important is durability to you? If you need a phone that can withstand serious abuse, the XR20 is the clear choice.
  2. Do you value performance and camera quality? The Razr 40 offers a much better experience in these areas.
  3. Are you drawn to the foldable form factor? If you want a phone that stands out from the crowd and offers unique usability, the Razr 40 is worth considering.

Scenario-Based Recommendations:

  • "I work on a construction site, and my phone is constantly getting dropped and covered in dirt." Go for the Nokia XR20. Durability is paramount.
  • "I'm a social media influencer, and I need a phone with a great camera and a unique look." The Motorola Razr 40 is the better option. It offers better photos and videos.
  • "I want a phone that can handle demanding games and apps without breaking the bank." The Razr 40 wins here due to its superior processor and RAM.

My Choice

If I were to choose between these two phones, I would pick the Motorola Razr 40.

Here's why:

While I appreciate the Nokia XR20's ruggedness, I'm not typically in situations where I need that level of durability. The Razr 40's superior performance, camera quality, and, let's be honest, the sheer coolness factor of the foldable design are much more appealing to me. I am very careful with my gadgets, so for me, the trade-off between fragility and functionality is well worth it. Plus, the faster charging, smoother display, and more modern software experience on the Razr 40 would make it a more enjoyable daily driver.

And that's all!

Alex Griffin
Alex Griffin

Technology analyst specializing in mobile devices and consumer electronics.

Core Expertise

  • Mobile technology analysis
  • Consumer electronics evaluation
  • Technical specification interpretation
  • User experience insights

Professional Mission Empowering readers to make informed technology decisions by transforming intricate specifications into understandable, practical guidance.

Demystifying technology, one device at a time.