Nokia X30 vs Samsung Galaxy M35 - Detailed Phone Comparison

Detailed Comparison

Specification
Nokia X30
Nokia X30
Nokia

General

Launch Date September 21, 2022 May 24, 2024
Release Year 2022 2024

Physical

Volume 93.94 cm³ 116.09 cm³
Screen Size to Weight Ratio 3.48 "/g 2.97 "/g
Weight 185 g 222 g
Height 158.9 mm 162.3 mm
Width 73.9 mm 78.6 mm
Thickness 8 mm 9.1 mm
Foldable Design No No
Available Colors
  • Cloudy Blue
  • Ice White
  • Gray
  • Light Blue
  • Dark Blue

Display

Screen Size 6.43 " 6.6 "
Resolution 1080 x 2400 1080 x 2340
Aspect Ratio 20:9 19.5:9
Screen-to-Body Ratio 85 % 83.8 %
Pixel Density 409 PPI 390 PPI
Refresh Rate 90 Hz 120 Hz
Typical Brightness 450 nits N/A
HBM Brightness N/A 1000 nits
Peak Brightness 700 nits N/A

Hardware

Battery Capacity per Screen Area 101.58 mAh/in² 137.74 mAh/in²
Battery Density 44.71 mAh/cm³ 51.69 mAh/cm³
Battery Capacity 4200 mAh 6000 mAh
NFC Support Yes Yes
Chipset Qualcomm SM6375 Snapdragon 695 5G (6 nm) Exynos 1380 (5 nm)
CPU Octa-core (2x2.2 GHz Kryo 660 Gold & 6x1.7 GHz Kryo 660 Silver) Octa-core (4x2.4 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55)
GPU Adreno 619 Mali-G68 MP5

Connectivity

USB Version 2.0 2.0
OTG Support 1 1
DisplayPort
DisplayPort Version N/A N/A
USB Features USB Type-C 2.0, OTG USB Type-C 2.0, OTG

Software

Operating System Android Android
Initial OS Version 12 14
Maximum OS Version 13

Comparison Summary

Alright, let's dive into a head-to-head comparison of the Nokia X30 and the Samsung Galaxy M35. As always, we’re not just going to rattle off specs; we’re going to break down what these numbers actually mean for you in your day-to-day. Let’s get started!

1. Specifications Breakdown

FeatureNokia X30Samsung Galaxy M35Real-World Implications
Design
Dimensions158.9 × 73.9 × 8 mm162.3 × 78.6 × 9.1 mmThe M35 is larger and bulkier, making the X30 potentially more comfortable for one-handed use and pocketability.
Weight185g222gThe X30 is significantly lighter (37g difference), which you'll feel throughout the day and during extended use.
BuildStandardStandardBoth have a standard smartphone design; no foldable tech here.
Display
Size6.43"6.6"The M35 offers a slightly larger viewing area, which can be nicer for media consumption and gaming.
Resolution1080x24001080x2340Both offer a similar FHD+ experience; resolution differences are negligible in everyday use.
PPI409390Both offer similar pixel density and image sharpness; again, difficult to discern the difference with the naked eye.
TechnologyAMOLEDAMOLEDBoth feature vibrant AMOLED displays with excellent colors and contrast, beneficial for all types of content.
Refresh Rate90Hz120HzThe M35 offers a smoother visual experience with its 120Hz display, especially noticeable when scrolling or gaming.
Brightness0 nits0 nitsBoth have identical peak brightness; unfortunately the number is missing and can not be compared.
Performance
ChipsetQualcomm SM6375 Snapdragon 695 5G (6 nm)Exynos 1380 (5 nm)The M35's Exynos 1380, built on a more efficient 5nm process, will likely provide better power efficiency and raw performance.
AnTuTu Score410,072578,500The M35 is clearly faster according to benchmarks, meaning faster app loads and smoother multitasking for everyday use.
GPUAdreno 619Mali-G68 MP5Different GPU's will offer varied performance in graphic intensive tasks; M35 will likely handle graphically demanding apps and games more smoothly.
Camera
Standard50MP, f/1.8, 1.00 µm pixel size50MP, f/1.8, 1/2" sensor, Sony LYT-600, 1.00 µm pixel sizeSimilar main cameras. The M35 benefits from a slightly larger sensor and the reputable Sony LYT-600, likely resulting in better light gathering, less noise.
Selfie16MP, f/2.4, 1.00 µm pixel size13MP, f/2.2, 1.12 µm pixel sizeThe X30 has a higher-resolution selfie camera but the M35 has a wider aperture for better low-light photos.
Wide Angle13MP, f/2.48MP, f/2.2The X30 has a higher resolution ultrawide, while the M35 has the edge for wider aperture.
MacroNone2MP, f/2.4The M35 includes a dedicated macro camera for close-up shots, a feature the X30 lacks.
Video1080p@30/60fps, Slow-motion 120 fps4K@30fps with EIS, 1080p@30/60fps with EIS, 720p@480fps with EIS, Slow-motion 480 fpsThe M35 has the ability to record 4k video and has superior slow motion video capabilities.
FeaturesDigital zoom, Dual camera, OIS, etc.2x2 OCL, Pro Video Mode, 4K Video, Triple camera, Ultra stable video, OIS, etc.The M35 provides a range of advanced video features, while the X30 offers a more basic dual camera setup.
Battery Life
Capacity4200mAh6000mAhThe M35 offers significantly longer battery life. This will likely translate to all-day battery usage and reduced charging frequency.
Charging33W Fast Charging25W Fast ChargingThe X30 will charge slightly faster, while both should recharge fairly quickly.

2. Key Insights

Nokia X30 Strengths:

  • Lighter and More Compact Design: The X30 is notably lighter and smaller, making it easier to handle and carry around.
  • Slightly Faster Charging: The 33W fast charging will get you juiced up a bit quicker than the M35's 25W.
  • Higher Resolution Front and Ultrawide Cameras: The front camera and ultrawide on the Nokia X30 boast a slightly higher megapixel count, which can matter for those who love capturing details.

Samsung Galaxy M35 Strengths:

  • Superior Performance: The Exynos 1380 chipset on the M35 outshines the Snapdragon 695, providing faster app loads and smoother overall usage.
  • Significantly Larger Battery: The 6000mAh battery will allow the M35 to easily last throughout a full day of use.
  • 120Hz Refresh Rate: The display on the M35 is smoother due to a higher refresh rate.
  • Better Video Capabilities: The M35 can record videos at 4K resolution and has more advanced video recording features, making it much more versatile for those who love to shoot video.
  • Advanced Audio: The inclusion of Dolby Atmos, Hi-Res Audio, and stereo speakers on the M35 significantly enhances the audio experience.

Trade-Offs and Limitations:

  • Nokia X30's Older Chipset: The Snapdragon 695 is notably less powerful than the Exynos 1380, leading to slower performance.
  • Samsung Galaxy M35's Bulk: The M35 is noticeably heavier and thicker, which might be a turnoff for users who prefer a smaller, lighter phone.

3. User Profiles and Recommendations

Nokia X30 is best suited for:

  • Users who prioritize lightness and compactness: Those who prefer phones that are easy to handle and slip into a pocket will appreciate the X30's design.
  • Casual users: If you're not a gamer and only use your phone for basic tasks, the X30 will handle it just fine, and its light design will be more appealing.
  • Those who prefer speed of charging: The slightly faster charging will be welcome to users who need to juice up their phone quick.

Samsung Galaxy M35 is best suited for:

  • Power Users: Gamers, social media managers, content creators, and multitaskers will see the performance advantages of the M35.
  • Multimedia consumers: The M35's 120Hz display, stereo speakers, and better video recording quality make it superior for content consumption and creation.
  • Users who need exceptional battery life: If your day is busy, the M35's significantly larger battery is a big advantage.

4. Buying Decision Framework

To help you choose, consider these questions:

  1. Do you prioritize battery life or a lighter design? If battery life is key, the M35 is your best bet. If you prefer a lighter phone, the X30 wins.
  2. How important is performance? The M35 offers a much better experience for gaming, running more complex apps, and overall speed.
  3. What kind of camera and video quality do you need? If shooting video and having more advanced capabilities are important, you should go with the M35.

Scenario-Based Recommendations:

  • The On-the-Go Professional: If you're constantly on the move and need a phone that can keep up, the Samsung Galaxy M35 is the better choice due to its superior performance and long-lasting battery.
  • The Casual User: If your needs are basic, the Nokia X30 might suit you well with its lightweight build and compact size and still manage basic daily tasks well.
  • The Content Creator: If you plan to create videos, the Samsung Galaxy M35 has the upper hand with its 4k video recording and advanced features.
  • The Gaming Enthusiast: The Samsung Galaxy M35 is the obvious choice for it's superior performance and high refresh rate display.

Conclusion

Both of these phones are capable in different areas. The Samsung Galaxy M35 is clearly a step up when it comes to performance, battery life, and versatility of the cameras. The Nokia X30 has its appeal to a select few that value the lighter build, but for most users, the superior tech of the M35 will be more valuable.

What would I choose and why?

Personally, I would pick the Samsung Galaxy M35. While I appreciate the lighter build of the Nokia X30, the significant advantages in performance, battery life, display smoothness, and video recording capabilities of the M35 are simply too compelling to ignore. As a tech journalist who's always on the go, the M35 aligns more with my usage scenarios, making it the most logical choice. I need a device that can handle heavy multitasking, has a camera I can rely on, and a battery that lasts all day, and the M35 fits that bill perfectly.

Alex Griffin
Alex Griffin

Technology analyst specializing in mobile devices and consumer electronics.

Core Expertise

  • Mobile technology analysis
  • Consumer electronics evaluation
  • Technical specification interpretation
  • User experience insights

Professional Mission Empowering readers to make informed technology decisions by transforming intricate specifications into understandable, practical guidance.

Demystifying technology, one device at a time.