Alright, let's dive deep into the Nokia X30 and Samsung Galaxy A35. As a tech journalist, I'm always keen to see how specs translate into real-world experiences, so let's get started.
1. Specifications Breakdown
| Feature | Nokia X30 | Samsung Galaxy A35 | Real-World Implications |
|---|---|---|---|
| Design | |||
| Dimensions | 158.9 x 73.9 x 8 mm | 161.7 x 78 x 8.2 mm | A35 is slightly taller and wider, might feel bulkier. X30 more compact, potentially better for one-handed use. |
| Weight | 185g | 209g | X30 is noticeably lighter, could be more comfortable for extended use. A35 feels more substantial. |
| Build | Gorilla Glass Victus | Gorilla Glass Victus | Both offer great scratch and shatter protection for daily wear and tear. |
| Display | |||
| Size | 6.43" | 6.6" | A35 gives a bit more screen real estate for media and gaming. X30 slightly smaller but still large enough for most. |
| Resolution | 1080x2400 | 1080x2340 | Both offer sharp, clear visuals; A35 is 2.6% different so its negligible. |
| PPI | 409 | 390 | Both have crisp display, slightly more sharp on the X30, although imperceptible to the human eye. |
| Technology | AMOLED | AMOLED | Vibrant colors, deep blacks, and great contrast for both. |
| Refresh Rate | 90Hz | 120Hz | A35 has smoother scrolling and animations, better for gamers and fast-paced content, X30 has still smooth experience. |
| Brightness | 0 nits | 0 nits | Both will perform similarly in different lighting conditions. |
| Performance | |||
| Chipset | Snapdragon 695 5G (6 nm) | Exynos 1380 (5 nm) | A35's chipset should handle most tasks smoother, and faster app loading. X30 is great for everyday task. |
| Antutu Score | 410,072 | 578,500 | A35 has a noticeable performance advantage for multitasking and gaming. |
| GPU | Adreno 619 | Mali-G68 MP5 | A35’s GPU will provide an edge in graphical performance for gaming. |
| Battery Life | |||
| Capacity | 4200mAh | 5000mAh | A35 should last longer on a single charge, better for heavy users. |
| Charging | 33W Fast Charging | 25W Fast Charging | X30 charges faster which is beneficial for those short on time. |
| Battery Features | Non-removable | Non-removable | Standard features for both. |
| Camera | |||
| Standard Camera | 50MP, f/1.8, 1.00µm | 50MP, f/1.8, 0.8µm, 1/1.96", Samsung GN8 | Both offer a 50MP main camera. A35 uses Samsung sensor and it's slightly smaller at 0.8µm pixel. A35 has a larger sensor size. |
| Selfie Camera | 16MP, f/2.4, 1.00µm | 13MP, f/2.2, 1.12µm | X30 has a higher resolution, A35 has a slightly wider aperture for better low light. |
| Wide Angle Lens | 13MP, f/2.4 | 8MP, f/2.2 | X30 has a higher resolution, A35 has a slightly wider aperture for better low light. |
| Macro Lens | None | 5MP, f/2.4, 1.12µm | A35 offers a macro lens for close-up shots. |
| Video Recording | 1080p@30/60fps, 120fps Slow-Mo | 4K@30fps with EIS, 1080p@30/60fps with EIS, 240fps Slow-Mo | A35 records at 4K, and a higher slow-mo frame rate, better for content creators, and includes EIS on all modes. |
| Camera Quality | N/A | DXOMark Mobile: 104 (Photo: 107, Video: 110) | A35 has an overall good rating for camera quality, offering very reliable photos and videos. No official score for X30. |
| Camera Features | Digital zoom, Dual camera, OIS, Digital image stabilization, CDAF, etc. | 2x2 OCL, Pro Video Mode, 4K Video, Digital zoom, Triple camera, OIS, Digital image stabilization, All Pixel Omni- Directional PDAF, NPU AI Engine, etc. | A35 has more features overall, better for photography enthusiasts. |
| Software | |||
| OS | Android 12, up to 13 | Android 14, up to 18 | A35 has the newer Android version, and more promised updates. |
| Connectivity | |||
| WiFi | 802.11a/b/g/n/ac/ax | 802.11a/b/g/n/ac/ax | Similar WiFi capabilities, A35 has Wi-Fi MiMO. |
| Bluetooth | 5.1 LE | 5.3 | A35 has a newer Bluetooth version, with a better support of codecs for quality audio and latency. |
| GPS | GPS, A-GPS, GLONASS, etc. | GPS, A-GPS, GLONASS, etc. | Similar GPS capabilities. |
| SIM | Dual SIM | Dual SIM | Dual SIM capabilities for both. |
| Storage | |||
| Internal | 128GB/256GB | 128GB/256GB | Both offer similar storage options. |
| RAM | 6GB/8GB | 6GB/8GB | Both offer same RAM options. |
| Expandable | No | No | No expandable storage on both. |
| Audio | |||
| Quality | Basic audio features | Dolby Atmos, Hi-Res Audio, Stereo Speakers | A35 has enhanced audio features for immersive sound. |
| Security | |||
| Fingerprint Sensor | Yes | Yes | Basic biometric security features for both. |
| Sensors | Biometric, Proximity, Motion | Biometric, Proximity (Ultrasonic), Motion | A35 provides ultrasonic proximity, and other sensors, while X30 comes with proximity and motion sensor. |
2. Key Insights
Samsung Galaxy A35: Strengths
- Performance Powerhouse: The Exynos 1380 chipset paired with a Mali-G68 MP5 GPU translates to a 41% higher AnTuTu benchmark score compared to the Nokia X30, ensuring smoother multitasking and more robust gaming.
- Enhanced Display: A 120Hz refresh rate offers a more fluid visual experience, particularly noticeable when scrolling through content and playing games.
- Battery Dominance: The larger 5000mAh battery means longer usage times between charges, making it a great pick for heavy users.
- Superior Camera System: The Samsung GN8 sensor, additional Macro lens, and 4K video recording capabilities position the A35 as a versatile camera phone. The DXOMark scores of 104, 107, and 110 in Mobile, Photo, and Video quality, respectively, further emphasize its strength.
- Software Advantage: With Android 14 out of the box and the promise of more software updates, A35 ensures users have access to the latest features and security enhancements.
- Audio Excellence: With Dolby Atmos, Hi-Res Audio, and Stereo Speakers, it gives a much better sound experience than the Nokia.
Nokia X30: Strengths
- Compact and Light: It is lighter and smaller, making it a better fit for users who prefer a more comfortable in-hand feel.
- Faster Charging: Its 33W fast charging ensures quicker battery top-ups, ideal for users always on the go.
- Decent Display Quality: While not as smooth as the A35, the AMOLED screen still provides vivid colors and deep blacks.
Trade-Offs and Limitations
- Nokia X30: Suffers from lower processing power, lacks a macro lens, inferior video recording, and older software.
- Samsung Galaxy A35: Slightly heavier and bulkier. Charging is slower compared to X30.
3. User Profiles and Recommendations
Samsung Galaxy A35
- Power Users: Ideal for gamers, multitaskers, and those who demand consistent, fluid performance.
- Content Creators: Great choice for video and photography enthusiasts due to its superior camera setup and 4K video capabilities.
- Media Consumers: Perfect for enjoying movies and videos due to its larger, smoother display and enhanced audio system.
Nokia X30
- Practical Users: A good option for those who prioritize ease of handling, and don't need cutting-edge tech.
- Budget-Conscious Shoppers: If priced competitively, it can offer good value for everyday use.
4. Buying Decision Framework
Here are three practical questions to help you decide:
- How crucial is performance for you? If you're a gamer or someone who demands snappy responsiveness, the A35's Exynos chipset is a better choice. If you do casual tasks, X30 is fine.
- How important are camera quality and features? If you're passionate about photography and videography, the A35's 4K recording, and extra camera features make it a better pick.
- Do you prefer a large screen and long battery life, or a compact device with fast charging? If a big screen and longer endurance is a priority, the A35 is better. If ease of handling and quick charging are more important, the X30 is the way to go.
Scenario-Based Recommendations:
- The Gamer: Choose the Samsung Galaxy A35 for its superior performance, faster refresh rate display, and better graphics.
- The Photographer: Choose the Samsung Galaxy A35 for its feature-rich camera, and extra features such as 4K video and macro lens.
- The Commuter: If size and charging speed matter more, the Nokia X30 is suitable. However, if you plan to consume media or create content, the Samsung Galaxy A35 will be a much better option.
- The Budget-Conscious User: Choose the Nokia X30 if it offers a much cheaper price compared to the Samsung Galaxy A35.
My Choice
If I were choosing between these two phones, I would personally go for the Samsung Galaxy A35. While the Nokia X30 has its charm with its compact size and faster charging, the A35 simply offers a more well-rounded package for my needs. As someone who enjoys gaming, high-quality video recording, and smooth performance, the A35's powerful processor, versatile camera system, and stunning display make it the better choice. The improved battery life and software support are also crucial for daily usage. It provides a better bang for my buck as I want the most up-to-date technology.
