Smartphone Comparison: Nokia X20 vs. ZTE Blade A75 4G
1. Specifications Comparison
| Feature | Nokia X20 | ZTE Blade A75 4G | Practical Impact |
|---|---|---|---|
| Design | |||
| Dimensions | 168.9 × 79.7 × 9.1 mm | 164.1 × 75.8 × 8.6 mm | The Nokia X20 is larger and slightly bulkier, which may be less comfortable for users with smaller hands; The ZTE Blade A75 4G is more pocketable and lighter. |
| Weight | 220g | 189g | The ZTE Blade A75 4G is significantly lighter, making it more comfortable to hold for extended periods. The Nokia X20 feels more substantial but less portable. |
| Display | |||
| Size | 6.67" | 6.6" | Both phones offer similar screen sizes for media consumption, but the difference is not noticeable. |
| Resolution | 1080x2400 | 720x1612 | The Nokia X20 has a much sharper display, resulting in clearer text and images. The ZTE Blade A75 4G's lower resolution may appear pixelated for demanding users. |
| PPI | 395 | 267 | The Nokia X20's higher pixel density results in a noticeably sharper display, leading to a better visual experience. |
| Technology | IPS LCD | IPS LCD | Both use the same LCD technology, offering similar color reproduction, contrast, and viewing angles. |
| Refresh Rate | 60Hz | 90Hz | The ZTE Blade A75 4G's 90Hz refresh rate will make scrolling and animations appear smoother than the Nokia X20's 60Hz. |
| Brightness | 0 nits | 0 nits | Unable to compare brightness due to missing values. |
| Performance | |||
| Chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 5G (8 nm) | Unisoc T606 (12 nm) | The Nokia X20's Snapdragon 480 5G offers faster processing speeds and better graphics performance than the Unisoc T606, for quicker app loads and smoother gameplay. |
| Antutu Score | 323,425 | 240,000 | The Nokia X20 exhibits superior overall performance based on the AnTuTu benchmark, indicating it will handle demanding tasks better. |
| GPU | Adreno 619 | Mali-G57 MP1 | The Adreno 619 in the Nokia X20 generally provides better graphics performance than the Mali-G57 MP1 in the ZTE Blade A75 4G. |
| Battery | |||
| Capacity | 4470mAh | 5000mAh | The ZTE Blade A75 4G should offer longer battery life due to its larger capacity, allowing for more usage between charges. |
| Charging | 18W | 22.5W | The ZTE Blade A75 4G charges slightly faster, reducing the time spent tethered to a power outlet. |
| Features | Non-removable | Non-removable | Both devices have non-removable batteries, which is standard in modern smartphones. |
| Camera | |||
| Standard | 64MP, f/1.79, 0.80µm | 50MP, f/1.8 | Nokia X20 has higher resolution and slightly wider aperture, which should provide more detail and better low light performance on paper. Sensor details are missing for both phones. |
| Selfie | 32MP, f/2.0 | 8MP | Nokia X20 captures significantly more detail in selfies due to its higher resolution sensor. |
| Wide Angle | 5MP | Not Available | Nokia X20 provides a wider field of view, allowing for more expansive shots; ZTE Blade A75 4G does not have a wide-angle camera. |
| Portrait (Depth) | 2MP | Not Available | The Nokia X20 provides better background blur for portrait shots; ZTE Blade A75 4G does not have a dedicated depth sensor. |
| Macro | 2MP | Not Available | The Nokia X20 allows users to capture close-up shots; ZTE Blade A75 4G does not have a macro lens. |
| Video | 1080p@30/60fps, 120 fps slow-mo | 1080p@30fps, No slow-mo | Both can record 1080p video, but Nokia X20 can record smoother video at 60fps. The Nokia X20 also supports 120 fps slow motion, whereas the ZTE Blade A75 4G doesn't support slow motion. |
| Features | Quadruple camera | Dual camera, Digital Image Stabilization, PDAF, Face Detection | Nokia X20 offers a more versatile camera system with more lenses, but the ZTE Blade A75 4G has features like digital image stabilization, PDAF, and face detection, indicating more advanced processing. |
| Software | |||
| OS | Android 11 (upgradable to 14) | Android 13 | ZTE Blade A75 4G launches with a newer Android OS version, offering more up to date features. Nokia X20 will have software updates, but is older out of the box. |
| Connectivity | |||
| WiFi | 802.11ac, Dual-band | 802.11ac, Dual-band, Wi-Fi Display | Both support dual-band WiFi, but ZTE Blade A75 4G has Wi-Fi Display which allows sharing of the screen wirelessly to compatible devices. |
| Bluetooth | 5.0 LE | 5.0 LE | Both phones have similar Bluetooth capabilities for connecting to wireless devices. |
| GPS | GPS, A-GPS, GLONASS, Galileo | GPS, A-GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo | ZTE Blade A75 4G supports Beidou, potentially resulting in more accurate and faster location services in regions with Beidou coverage. |
| SIM | Dual SIM Dual Standby | Dual SIM Dual Standby | Both phones support dual SIM cards and can have two sims active, allowing for the use of two mobile numbers on the same device. |
| Storage | |||
| Internal | 128GB | 128GB or 256GB | The ZTE Blade A75 4G offers more storage capacity with a 256 GB option for users with large media libraries. |
| RAM | 6GB or 8GB | 4GB or 8GB | Both phones offer an 8 GB RAM option for more demanding multitasking, but the base model of the ZTE Blade A75 4G has less RAM. |
| Expandable | No | No | Neither phone supports expandable storage, so users will be limited to internal storage options. |
| Audio | |||
| Quality | 2 Microphones | DTS / DTS X | ZTE Blade A75 4G provides better surround sound using DTS, while the Nokia X20 is better for calls with its 2 microphones. |
| Security | |||
| Features | Side-mounted fingerprint sensor | Side-mounted fingerprint sensor | Both phones offer convenient and secure fingerprint unlocking. |
| Build | |||
| Screen Protection | Unknown | Unknown | Unable to compare screen protection without more specific information. |
| Sensors | |||
| Features | Fingerprint, Proximity, Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope | Fingerprint, Proximity, Accelerometer, Gyroscope | The Nokia X20 additionally includes a compass, making it more suitable for navigation and AR apps. |
2. Key Differences Analysis
Nokia X20 Advantages:
- Sharper Display: Significantly higher resolution and pixel density for better visual clarity.
- Superior Performance: Faster processor and GPU, resulting in smoother overall performance and better gaming experiences.
- More Versatile Cameras: Features a wide angle, portrait, and macro lens, allowing for more flexible photography options, and higher resolution selfie camera.
- Compass: Includes compass for advanced navigation and AR apps.
- Video recording Shoots 1080p@60fps and slow motion video at 120fps
ZTE Blade A75 4G Advantages:
- Newer OS: Comes with a more recent version of Android (13) out of the box.
- Larger Battery: Offers longer battery life with its 5000mAh battery.
- Faster Charging: Charges faster with 22.5W, reducing downtime.
- Smoother Display: 90Hz refresh rate providing a more fluid user experience.
- Lighter Build: More comfortable and pocketable due to its lighter and more compact design.
- Extra Storage: 256 GB Option
- Better audio: DTS / DTS X
Trade-offs:
- The Nokia X20 sacrifices a slightly larger battery and higher refresh rate for a superior display and performance. It also lacks expandable storage.
- The ZTE Blade A75 4G compromises on display resolution and performance for a larger battery, faster charging, and smoother screen transitions, along with a slightly newer OS. It also lacks expandable storage.
3. User Profiles & Recommendations
Ideal User for Nokia X20:
- Users who prioritize a sharp and detailed display for media consumption and reading.
- Gamers and performance-oriented users who require a smoother experience with demanding apps.
- Photography enthusiasts who need a more versatile camera system, especially for selfies, and a wide angle lens.
- Users who need navigation tools.
- Users who want to be able to shoot video at 1080p@60fps and slow motion.
Use Cases for Nokia X20:
- Watching high-resolution videos and movies.
- Playing graphic-intensive games.
- Taking varied photos, including wide shots, portraits, closeups, and selfies.
- Using navigation apps in areas where a compass is useful.
- Recording high-quality video, including slow-motion footage.
Ideal User for ZTE Blade A75 4G:
- Users who prioritize battery life and value a more lightweight and compact device.
- Users who prefer a smoother UI experience with a higher refresh rate.
- Users who want a newer Android operating system out of the box.
- Users who desire enhanced audio output.
- Users who prioritize storage space.
Use Cases for ZTE Blade A75 4G:
- Daily usage with extended periods of browsing, social media, and communication.
- Users who frequently watch streaming video on the go and value a longer battery life.
- Users who value a smoother experience while navigating the UI.
- Users who listen to audio on their phone and want an immersive experience.
4. Decision Framework
Key Questions for Buyers:
- Display Preference: Do you prioritize a sharper, more detailed display (Nokia X20), or smoother scrolling (ZTE Blade A75 4G)?
- Performance Needs: How important is gaming performance and overall speed of app usage? (Nokia X20 is better for more demanding use)
- Battery Life: Do you need the longest possible battery life, or is faster charging more important? (ZTE Blade A75 4G offers longer battery life, slightly faster charging)
Scenario-Based Recommendations:
- For Gamers/Heavy App Users: Choose the Nokia X20 for its superior performance, sharper display, and more versatile cameras.
- For Everyday Users: Choose the ZTE Blade A75 4G for its longer battery life, faster charging, and smoother user experience, especially if not running graphically demanding apps.
- For Photography: The Nokia X20 provides more flexibility due to its multi-lens setup, especially for selfies.
My Choice
If I were to choose between these two phones, I would personally pick the Nokia X20. While I acknowledge that the ZTE Blade A75 4G has some attractive features, including the larger battery, faster charging, and smoother display, the Nokia X20's advantages in display quality, performance, camera versatility, and the added compass are more aligned with my personal needs and usage patterns. I value a crisp, detailed display for media consumption and appreciate having the extra processing power for a smoother experience when running demanding apps and games. Also, I often take pictures, and the additional camera lenses provided by the Nokia X20 make it a more versatile tool. I can also benefit from recording 1080p videos at 60 frames per second and slow motion. While the ZTE is a decent phone, the Nokia better fits my needs.
