Nokia X20 vs Google Pixel 8 Pro - Detailed Phone Comparison

Detailed Comparison

Specification
Nokia X20
Nokia X20
Nokia

General

Launch Date May 12, 2021 October 12, 2023
Release Year 2021 2023

Physical

Volume 122.5 cm³ 109.46 cm³
Screen Size to Weight Ratio 3.03 "/g 3.15 "/g
Weight 220 g 213 g
Height 168.9 mm 162.6 mm
Width 79.7 mm 76.5 mm
Thickness 9.1 mm 8.8 mm
Foldable Design No No
Available Colors
  • Midnight Sun
  • Nordic Blue
  • Mint
  • Obsidian
  • Porcelain
  • Bay

Display

Screen Size 6.67 " 6.7 "
Resolution 1080 x 2400 1344 x 2992
Aspect Ratio 20:9 20:9
Screen-to-Body Ratio 79.8 % 87 %
Pixel Density 395 PPI 489 PPI
Refresh Rate N/A 120 Hz
Typical Brightness 450 nits N/A
HBM Brightness N/A 1600 nits
Peak Brightness N/A 2400 nits

Hardware

Battery Capacity per Screen Area 100.47 mAh/in² 112.50 mAh/in²
Battery Density 36.49 mAh/cm³ 46.13 mAh/cm³
Battery Capacity 4470 mAh 5050 mAh
NFC Support Yes Yes
Chipset Qualcomm SM4350 Snapdragon 480 5G (8 nm) Google Tensor G3 (4 nm)
CPU Octa-core (2x2.0 GHz Kryo 460 & 6x1.8 GHz Kryo 460) Nona-core (1x3.0 GHz Cortex-X3 & 4x2.45 GHz Cortex-A715 & 4x2.15 GHz Cortex-A510)
GPU Adreno 619 Immortalis-G715s MC10

Connectivity

USB Version 2.0 3.2
OTG Support 1
DisplayPort
DisplayPort Version N/A N/A
USB Features USB Type-C 2.0, OTG USB Type-C 3.2

Software

Operating System Android Android
Initial OS Version 11 14
Maximum OS Version 14 21

Comparison Summary

1. Specifications Comparison

Design

FeatureNokia X20Google Pixel 8 ProPractical Impact
Dimensions168.9 × 79.7 × 9.1 mm162.6 × 76.5 × 8.8 mmNokia X20 is larger and slightly bulkier, potentially less comfortable for single-handed use.
Weight220g213gGoogle Pixel 8 Pro is slightly lighter, which might be noticeable during extended use.

Display

FeatureNokia X20Google Pixel 8 ProPractical Impact
Size6.67"6.7"Negligible size difference; both offer ample screen real estate.
Resolution1080x24001344x2992Pixel 8 Pro has a significantly sharper display, noticeably clearer text and images.
PPI395489Pixel 8 Pro has higher pixel density, leading to sharper and more detailed visuals.
TechnologyIPS LCDOLEDPixel 8 Pro offers better contrast, deeper blacks, and more vibrant colors.
Refresh Rate60Hz120HzPixel 8 Pro provides smoother scrolling and animations, more fluid gaming experience.
Brightness0 nits2400 nitsPixel 8 Pro screen is significantly brighter, offering better visibility in bright sunlight. Nokia X20 brightness is unknown.

Performance

FeatureNokia X20Google Pixel 8 ProPractical Impact
ChipsetQualcomm SM4350 Snapdragon 480 5G (8 nm)Google Tensor G3 (4 nm)Pixel 8 Pro offers significantly faster processing, better app loading, smoother multitasking.
AnTuTu Score323,4251,142,984Pixel 8 Pro is much faster in benchmarks, implying superior performance in real-world usage scenarios.
GPUAdreno 619Immortalis-G715s MC10Pixel 8 Pro's GPU provides better graphics performance, especially for gaming.

Camera

FeatureNokia X20Google Pixel 8 ProPractical Impact
Standard Camera64MP, f/1.79, 0.80µm pixel size50MP, f/1.69, 1/1.31" sensor, 1.20µm pixelsPixel 8 Pro has a larger sensor with larger pixels, which should result in better low-light performance and image quality.
Selfie Camera32MP, f/2.010.8MP, f/2.2, 1/2.65" sensor, 1.22µm pixelsNokia X20 has higher resolution for the front-facing camera, but Pixel 8 Pro sensor size is better.
Telephoto LensNone48MP, f/2.8, 1/2.55" sensor, 0.70µm pixelsPixel 8 Pro offers optical zoom capabilities missing on Nokia X20.
Wide Angle Lens5MPNoneNokia X20 has a dedicated wide-angle lens for capturing more expansive scenes.
Portrait (depth) Lens2MPNoneNokia X20 has a dedicated depth lens for bokeh effects.
Macro Lens2MPNoneNokia X20 has a dedicated macro lens for capturing close-up details.
Wide Angle + MacroNone48MP, f/1.95, 0.80µm pixelsPixel 8 Pro offers combined ultrawide and macro functionality with a 48MP sensor.
Video1080p@30/60fpsUp to 4K@60fps, various 1080p resolutions, OIS, EISPixel 8 Pro offers far better video recording capabilities, with higher resolution, image stabilization, and more features.
DxOMarkNot TestedMain: 153, Selfie: 145Pixel 8 Pro camera scores high in DxOMark, indicating great quality.

Battery

FeatureNokia X20Google Pixel 8 ProPractical Impact
Capacity4470mAh5050mAhPixel 8 Pro has a larger battery, likely resulting in longer battery life.
Charging18W fast30W fastPixel 8 Pro charges faster, reducing time spent waiting for the phone to power up.
FeaturesNon-removableNon-removable, Reverse Charging, 23W wireless chargingPixel 8 Pro provides more charging options and convenience.

2. Key Differences Analysis

Nokia X20 Advantages

  • Dedicated Macro, Depth, and Wide Angle Cameras: Offers more flexibility in photography.
  • Higher Resolution Selfie Camera: Good for those who prioritize selfie quality and high resolution for social media posts.
  • Side-Mounted Fingerprint Sensor: Some users might prefer this location for convenience.
  • Dual SIM Support (Nano SIM + Nano SIM): Users who need to use two physical SIM cards.
  • Potentially lower cost: As an older device, the X20 will likely be cheaper.

Google Pixel 8 Pro Advantages

  • Significantly Superior Display: OLED, higher resolution, higher refresh rate and dramatically brighter.
  • Much Higher Performance: Top-tier chipset and RAM for smooth multitasking and gaming.
  • Better Main Camera with Larger Sensor and Pixel Size: Superior image quality, especially in low light.
  • Optical Zoom: Better zoom capability than the X20.
  • Advanced Video Recording: 4K, image stabilization, and various frame rate options.
  • More Modern Features: Wireless charging, reverse charging, and better connectivity options like WiFi 7 and Bluetooth 5.3.
  • Better Software Support: Receives major OS updates.
  • Better Audio Quality: Features stereo speakers and noise cancellation microphones for enhanced audio quality.
  • Superior Build Quality: Corning Gorilla Glass Victus 2 screen protection
  • More Storage Options: Comes in multiple storage variants up to 1TB.

Significant Trade-offs

  • Nokia X20: Sacrifices performance, display quality, and advanced features for a lower cost.
  • Google Pixel 8 Pro: Comes at a much higher price point.

3. User Profiles & Recommendations

Nokia X20 Ideal User

  • Budget-conscious: Those looking for an affordable smartphone with basic functionality.
  • Basic Photography Needs: Users who want a variety of lenses (macro, depth, wide) without needing top-tier quality.
  • Users Needing Dual Physical SIMs: Individuals who need to use two physical SIM cards simultaneously.
  • Light Users: Those who primarily browse the web, use social media, and don't do heavy gaming or video editing.

Use Cases: Basic communication, web browsing, casual photography, and everyday use.

Google Pixel 8 Pro Ideal User

  • Power Users: Those who want the best performance for multitasking, gaming, and demanding apps.
  • Photography and Videography Enthusiasts: Individuals who desire high-quality photos, videos and advanced features.
  • Multimedia Consumers: Users who value a superior display for watching videos, and engaging in immersive experiences.
  • Tech-Savvy Users: Those who want the latest features and technology like wireless charging, WiFi 7, and superior software support.
  • Users who prioritize future-proofing: Those who plan to use their phone for several years.

Use Cases: Professional photography and videography, mobile gaming, demanding apps, and media consumption.

4. Decision Framework

Key Questions for Buyers

  1. What is my budget? The Pixel 8 Pro is significantly more expensive than the Nokia X20.
  2. What are my primary use cases? Do I need high performance and top-tier camera capabilities, or basic functions for everyday use?
  3. How important is display quality? Do I want smooth animations, bright, vibrant colours and a sharp resolution?

Scenario-Based Recommendations

  • Budget-Conscious User: If budget is the main concern, and you only need basic phone functionality, the Nokia X20 is a reasonable choice.
  • Photography Enthusiast: If you want the best mobile photography and videography experience, the Google Pixel 8 Pro is the clear winner.
  • Multimedia Lover: For those who enjoy watching videos and consuming media on their phones, the Google Pixel 8 Pro's superior display makes it the best option.
  • Performance Seeker: If you are a heavy gamer, multitasker, or need smooth performance, the Google Pixel 8 Pro's powerful chipset makes it the right choice.

What I Would Choose and Why

Given the significant differences in display quality, performance, camera capabilities, and software support, I would choose the Google Pixel 8 Pro. While the Nokia X20 may be more affordable, the Pixel 8 Pro offers a superior experience across nearly every metric that matters to me as a user.

Here's a breakdown of my reasoning:

  • Display Quality: As someone who consumes a lot of content on my phone, the OLED display with a higher resolution, brighter screen, and a 120Hz refresh rate on the Pixel 8 Pro is a major draw. It provides a much more enjoyable viewing experience.
  • Performance: I value smooth, lag-free performance, and the Pixel 8 Pro's Tensor G3 chipset is significantly more powerful than the Snapdragon 480. This means faster loading times and a better multitasking experience.
  • Camera Capabilities: I enjoy taking photos and videos, and the Pixel 8 Pro's superior camera with optical zoom and enhanced video recording capabilities is a significant advantage. The larger sensor and pixel size should lead to better overall image quality, especially in challenging lighting conditions.
  • Software and Features: The Pixel 8 Pro will get timely Android updates and comes with a range of useful features like wireless charging, better connectivity, and enhanced audio, all of which enhance the user experience.
  • Future-Proofing: The Pixel 8 Pro, being a more recent and higher-end device, will likely have longer software support and therefore a longer lifespan.

While the Nokia X20 might be adequate for basic use, I want a phone that provides a premium experience with the best features available. The Pixel 8 Pro ticks all those boxes. The significantly better camera quality, performance, and screen make it the more practical and enjoyable choice for my usage.

Emily Harper
Emily Harper

Technology Insights Specialist

Dedicated technology writer specializing in mobile device analysis and technology communication. Expert at translating complex smartphone features into clear, actionable insights for diverse audiences.

Key Strengths:

  • Mobile technology analysis
  • Digital media communication
  • Technical storytelling
  • User-centric technology insights

Bridging technical complexity with engaging, accessible narratives.