Nokia G60 vs Samsung Galaxy A35 - Detailed Phone Comparison

Detailed Comparison

Specification
Nokia G60
Nokia G60
Nokia

General

Launch Date September 1, 2022 March 15, 2024
Release Year 2022 2024

Physical

Volume 108.35 cm³ 103.42 cm³
Screen Size to Weight Ratio 3.46 "/g 3.16 "/g
Weight 190 g 209 g
Height 166 mm 161.7 mm
Width 75.9 mm 78 mm
Thickness 8.6 mm 8.2 mm
Foldable Design No No
Available Colors
  • Pure Black
  • Ice Gray
  • Navy
  • Iceblue
  • Lilac
  • Lemon

Display

Screen Size 6.58 " 6.6 "
Resolution 1080 x 2408 1080 x 2340
Aspect Ratio 20:9 19.5:9
Screen-to-Body Ratio 82.8 % 84.8 %
Pixel Density 401 PPI 390 PPI
Refresh Rate 120 Hz 120 Hz
Typical Brightness 400 nits N/A
HBM Brightness N/A 1000 nits
Peak Brightness N/A N/A

Hardware

Battery Capacity per Screen Area 103.93 mAh/in² 114.78 mAh/in²
Battery Density 41.53 mAh/cm³ 48.34 mAh/cm³
Battery Capacity 4500 mAh 5000 mAh
NFC Support Yes Yes
Chipset Qualcomm SM6375 Snapdragon 695 5G (6 nm) Exynos 1380 (5 nm)
CPU Octa-core (2x2.2 GHz Kryo 660 Gold & 6x1.7 GHz Kryo 660 Silver) Octa-core (4x2.4 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55)
GPU Adreno 619 Mali-G68 MP5

Connectivity

USB Version 2.0 2.0
OTG Support 1 1
DisplayPort
DisplayPort Version N/A N/A
USB Features USB Type-C 2.0, OTG USB Type-C 2.0, OTG

Software

Operating System Android Android
Initial OS Version 12 14
Maximum OS Version 18

Comparison Summary

Nokia G60 vs. Samsung Galaxy A35: A Comparative Analysis

Let's dive into a detailed comparison of the Nokia G60 and the Samsung Galaxy A35, dissecting their specifications and uncovering what they truly offer the everyday user.

1. Specifications Breakdown

FeatureNokia G60Samsung Galaxy A35Real-World Implications
Design
Dimensions (mm)166 x 75.9 x 8.6161.7 x 78 x 8.2A35 slightly more compact, potentially easier for one-handed use.
Weight (g)190209G60 noticeably lighter, reducing hand fatigue during extended use.
Display
TypeIPS LCDSuper AMOLEDA35 offers richer colors, deeper blacks, and better power efficiency due to AMOLED technology. G60's LCD might be brighter in direct sunlight.
Size (inches)6.586.6Negligible size difference; both offer ample screen real estate.
Resolution1080 x 24081080 x 2340Virtually identical sharpness; both provide crisp visuals for everyday tasks.
Refresh Rate (Hz)120120Both offer smooth scrolling and animations, enhancing the user experience.
Performance
ChipsetSnapdragon 695 5GExynos 1380 5GA35's Exynos 1380 boasts a more powerful CPU and GPU, translating to smoother multitasking, faster app loading, and potentially better gaming performance.
RAM (GB)4/66/8A35 offers more RAM in its base configuration, enabling better multitasking and app switching.
OSAndroid 12Android 14A35 ships with a newer Android version, offering potential feature and security advantages. G60's future OS updates are less certain.
Camera
Main Camera (MP)5050Comparable resolution, but A35 benefits from a larger sensor (GN8) and optical image stabilization (OIS) for potentially superior image quality.
Selfie Camera (MP)813A35's higher-resolution selfie camera likely captures more detailed self-portraits.
Video1080p@30fps4K@30fpsA35 offers superior video recording capabilities with 4K resolution.
Battery Life
Capacity (mAh)45005000A35's larger battery capacity suggests longer usage time on a single charge.
Charging20W Fast Charging25W Fast ChargingA35 offers slightly faster charging speeds.

2. Key Insights

The Samsung Galaxy A35 pulls ahead in several key areas: performance, camera, and battery life. Its more modern processor, larger RAM, superior camera system with OIS, and larger battery provide tangible benefits for users seeking a smoother, more capable smartphone experience. However, the Nokia G60 offers a lighter design, potentially making it more comfortable for extended use. It's also worth noting Nokia's commitment to durability and software updates, though the G60's update schedule is less defined than Samsung's.

3. User Profiles and Recommendations

Nokia G60: Best suited for users prioritizing a lightweight, durable phone for essential tasks like communication, web browsing, and light media consumption. Its longer software support commitment might also appeal to users valuing security and longevity.

Samsung Galaxy A35: Ideal for users who demand a more powerful and feature-rich smartphone experience, encompassing mobile gaming, photography, video recording, and demanding multitasking. Its vibrant AMOLED display and larger battery cater to media enthusiasts.

4. Buying Decision Framework

  • What is your budget? While both are mid-range, the A35 might be slightly more expensive depending on configuration.
  • What are your primary smartphone needs? Prioritize performance and features with the A35 or durability and simplicity with the G60.
  • How important is camera quality? The A35's superior camera system makes it the clear choice for photography enthusiasts.

My Choice: I would choose the Samsung Galaxy A35. While I appreciate Nokia's commitment to durability and sustainability, the A35's superior performance, camera capabilities, vibrant AMOLED display, and larger battery are compelling. The Exynos 1380 offers a significant performance advantage, and the enhanced camera system with OIS is crucial for capturing high-quality photos and videos. These factors outweigh the slight difference in weight and the G60's potential for longer software support for my personal needs. I value a smooth, responsive user experience and capturing memorable moments, making the A35 the better overall package.

Alex Griffin
Alex Griffin

Technology analyst specializing in mobile devices and consumer electronics.

Core Expertise

  • Mobile technology analysis
  • Consumer electronics evaluation
  • Technical specification interpretation
  • User experience insights

Professional Mission Empowering readers to make informed technology decisions by transforming intricate specifications into understandable, practical guidance.

Demystifying technology, one device at a time.