Alright, let's dive into a head-to-head comparison of the Nokia G60 and the Motorola Moto G24 Power. These two mid-range contenders offer distinct approaches to the smartphone experience, and understanding their differences is key to picking the right one for you. I'll lay out the technical details in an easy-to-digest format, focusing on what these specs actually mean for your everyday life.
1. Specifications Breakdown
Here's a detailed look at the key specifications, broken down into categories for easier understanding:
| Feature | Nokia G60 | Motorola Moto G24 Power | Real-World Implications |
|---|---|---|---|
| Design | |||
| Launch Date | 2022-09-01 | 2024-02-07 | The Moto G24 Power is newer, potentially having more up-to-date software and features. |
| Size (mm) | 166 x 75.9 x 8.6 | 163.5 x 74.5 x 9 | The Nokia is slightly taller and wider, while the Moto is a bit thicker. Consider hand size and pocket comfort. |
| Weight | 190g | 197g | The Nokia is lighter by 7g, which is a small but potentially noticeable difference during extended use. |
| Display | |||
| Size | 6.58" | 6.56" | Virtually identical screen sizes; negligible difference in daily use. |
| Resolution | 1080x2408 | 720x1612 | The Nokia has a much sharper display. Text and images will be clearer, especially noticeable when reading or watching videos. |
| PPI | 401 | 269 | The higher pixel density on the Nokia translates to significantly less pixelation and a crisper image. |
| Technology | IPS LCD | IPS LCD | Both use similar screen tech, meaning comparable viewing angles and color reproduction. |
| Refresh Rate | 120Hz | 90Hz | The Nokia's 120Hz display will feel smoother, especially during scrolling and gaming. |
| Brightness | 0 nits | 500 nits | The Motorola offers much better outdoor visibility. It will be significantly more readable in bright sunlight. |
| Performance | |||
| Chipset | Snapdragon 695 5G | Helio G85 | The Snapdragon 695 offers better overall performance and 5G connectivity. The Helio G85 is more of a budget-oriented chip. |
| Antutu Score | 410,072 | 266,894 | The Nokia is significantly faster for gaming, app loading, and general multitasking. |
| GPU | Adreno 619 | Mali-G52 MC2 | The Adreno GPU in the Nokia is more powerful and better for demanding games and graphics. |
| Battery Life | |||
| Capacity | 4500mAh | 6000mAh | The Motorola's much larger battery should provide significantly longer battery life on a single charge. |
| Charging | 20W Fast | 33W Fast | The Motorola charges faster, minimizing downtime. |
| Battery Type | Lithium | Li-Polymer | Minor difference in material composition, not a significant real-world factor for most users. |
| Camera | |||
| Standard Camera | 50MP f/1.8, 0.7µm | 50MP f/1.8, 0.64µm | Both have a 50MP main sensor, though slightly different pixel sizes. Comparable daylight performance is expected. |
| Selfie Camera | 8MP f/2.0, 0.64µm | 8MP f/2.0, 1.12µm | The Motorola's selfie camera has larger pixel size, potentially resulting in better low-light selfies. |
| Wide Angle Lens | 5MP f/2.0 | 2MP f/2.4 | The Nokia offers a higher resolution and wider aperture on its wide angle lens. |
| Portrait Mode (Depth) | 2MP f/2.4 | None | The Nokia provides a dedicated sensor for depth effects in portrait shots |
| Macro Lens | None | 2MP f/2.4 | The Motorola has a dedicated macro lens, allowing for close-up shots. |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps | Both record 1080p video at 30 frames per second. Similar video recording quality expected. |
| Video Features | 4K Video, Digital zoom, Triple camera, Digital image stabilization, Autofocus, Touch focus, Contrast detection autofocus (CDAF), Continuous shooting, Geotagging, Panorama, HDR, Face detection, White balance settings, ISO settings, Exposure compensation, Scene mode, Self-timer, Night Mode | Digital zoom, Triple camera, Digital image stabilization, Autofocus, Touch focus, Phase detection autofocus (PDAF), Geotagging, Panorama, HDR, Face detection, White balance settings, ISO settings, Exposure compensation, Scene mode, Self-timer, RAW | Both have good camera features with minor differences. Nokia has 4k recording while Motorola has PDAF and RAW capture. |
| Software & Connectivity | |||
| Operating System | Android 12 | Android 14 | The Motorola has a more up-to-date OS, likely with improved features and security. |
| WiFi | WiFi 6, Dual band | Dual Band | The Nokia supports the newer WiFi 6 standard, for faster speeds if your router supports it. |
| Bluetooth | 5.1 LE | 5.0 LE | The Nokia has a slightly more modern Bluetooth version, potentially offering better connectivity and features. |
| GPS | Full | Slightly less | The Nokia offers more satellite support for potentially more accurate navigation. |
| SIM | eSIM + Nano SIM | Dual Nano SIM | The Nokia offers the versatility of an eSIM along with a standard SIM, while the Moto has a dual SIM option. |
| Storage | |||
| Internal Storage | 64/128 GB | Not Specified | The Nokia offers more storage, a big factor for apps, media, and files. |
| RAM | 4/6 GB | Not Specified | The Nokia offers more RAM for better multitasking. |
| Expandable Storage | No | No | Neither offers additional storage through SD cards. |
| Audio | |||
| Audio Quality | Basic | Dolby Atmos, Stereo Speakers | The Motorola will provide a more immersive audio experience. |
| Security | |||
| Fingerprint Sensor | Side-mounted | Side-mounted | Both offer side-mounted fingerprint security. |
| Build Quality | |||
| Screen Protection | Gorilla Glass 5 | Unknown | The Nokia has better screen protection, offering increased scratch and drop resistance. |
| Sensors | Biometric: Fingerprint; Proximity: Proximity; Motion: Accelerometer, Gyroscope | Biometric: Fingerprint; Proximity: Proximity; Motion: Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope | The Motorola features a compass, which can be useful for mapping applications. |
2. Key Insights
Nokia G60 Strengths:
- Superior Display: The higher resolution and 120Hz refresh rate make for a sharper, smoother visual experience.
- Stronger Performance: The Snapdragon 695 chipset delivers significantly better processing power for gaming and multitasking.
- More Advanced Connectivity: Supports Wi-Fi 6, Bluetooth 5.1, and a wider array of GPS satellites.
- Versatile SIM: eSIM capability adds flexibility for international travel or multiple lines.
- Better Screen Protection: Corning Gorilla Glass 5 provides added durability.
Motorola Moto G24 Power Strengths:
- Massive Battery: A 6000mAh battery offers significantly longer battery life, ideal for heavy users.
- Faster Charging: 33W fast charging gets you back to full power quicker.
- Brighter Display: 500 nits brightness, much better visibility in sunlight.
- More Up-to-Date OS: Ships with Android 14, offering the latest software.
- Enhanced Audio: Dolby Atmos and stereo speakers provide a better audio experience.
- Better Macro Lens: Has a macro camera sensor.
- Better Selfie Camera Pixel Size: larger pixel size in the front camera.
Trade-offs and Limitations:
- The Nokia’s smaller battery will likely mean less longevity between charges compared to the Motorola.
- The Motorola lags behind in pure processing power and display resolution.
3. User Profiles and Recommendations
- Nokia G60: Ideal for users who prioritize display quality, performance for gaming or multitasking, and future-proofed connectivity. It's a great choice for those who value a smooth and snappy experience, and don't mind charging more often.
- Motorola Moto G24 Power: Perfect for users who need all-day battery life, watch a lot of videos in various lighting conditions and value a more modern software experience. It’s a great budget-friendly phone with extra audio capabilities.
4. Buying Decision Framework
Here are three questions to help you decide:
- How important is battery life? If you need your phone to last all day and possibly more, the Motorola is the obvious choice. If you don't mind charging daily, the Nokia's advantages might be more appealing.
- What do you value more: a crisper display or a brighter display? If reading and watching videos is crucial, the Nokia's higher-resolution screen will be better. If outdoor visibility is more important, the Motorola's brighter display is the winner.
- What kind of performance do you need? The Nokia will have significantly better performance for any kind of gaming, or more intensive applications. The Motorola will be fine for casual usage.
Scenario-Based Recommendations:
- The Power User: The Nokia, despite its battery life trade-off, might still appeal with its performance advantage and crisp display.
- The Heavy Media Consumer: The Motorola is better suited for long media consumption sessions thanks to its superior battery life and brighter display.
- The Casual User: The Motorola is the obvious choice for a good-value phone with modern software and battery life.
- The Photographer: Both have similar main cameras, however the Motorola has a macro sensor and a front-facing camera with a larger pixel size. If you take a lot of low light selfies or macro photos, the Motorola may be better for you. If you want ultrawide photos, then the Nokia would be a better choice.
My Choice
If I were choosing between these two, I'd lean towards the Nokia G60. While the Motorola’s battery life is incredibly appealing, my priority is a better, smoother display and the stronger processing power for day-to-day tasks and a bit of gaming. The ability to switch networks with eSIM is also useful. I can manage with daily charging to benefit from the more well-rounded and smoother experience the Nokia provides. I love that it's more future proof in terms of connectivity and storage. Ultimately, I think the Nokia provides more features that I am likely to take advantage of on a daily basis.
