Nokia G42 vs Xiaomi Redmi A3 - Detailed Phone Comparison

Detailed Comparison

Specification
Nokia G42
Nokia G42
Nokia

General

Launch Date June 28, 2023 February 23, 2024
Release Year 2023 2024

Physical

Volume 107.56 cm³ 106.58 cm³
Screen Size to Weight Ratio 3.38 "/g 3.48 "/g
Weight 193.8 g 193 g
Height 165 mm 168.3 mm
Width 75.8 mm 76.3 mm
Thickness 8.6 mm 8.3 mm
Foldable Design No No
Available Colors
  • Red
  • Purple
  • Gray
  • Midnight Black
  • Forest Green (Olive Green)
  • Star Blue (Lake Blue)

Display

Screen Size 6.56 " 6.71 "
Resolution 720 x 1612 720 x 1650
Aspect Ratio 20:9 21:9
Screen-to-Body Ratio 82.7 % 82.9 %
Pixel Density 269 PPI 268 PPI
Refresh Rate 90 Hz 90 Hz
Typical Brightness 450 nits N/A
HBM Brightness N/A 500 nits
Peak Brightness 560 nits N/A

Hardware

Battery Capacity per Screen Area 116.19 mAh/in² 111.05 mAh/in²
Battery Density 46.49 mAh/cm³ 46.91 mAh/cm³
Battery Capacity 5000 mAh 5000 mAh
NFC Support Yes Yes
Chipset Qualcomm SM4350-AC Snapdragon 480+ 5G (8 nm) Mediatek Helio G36 (12 nm)
CPU Octa-core (2x2.2 GHz Kryo 460 & 6x1.8 GHz Kryo 460) Octa-core (4x2.2 GHz Cortex-A53 & 4x1.6 GHz Cortex-A53)
GPU Adreno 619 PowerVR GE8320

Connectivity

USB Version 2.0 2.0
OTG Support 1
DisplayPort
DisplayPort Version N/A N/A
USB Features USB Type-C 2.0, OTG USB Type-C 2.0

Software

Operating System Android Android
Initial OS Version 13 14
Maximum OS Version 14

Comparison Summary

1. Specifications Comparison

FeatureNokia G42Xiaomi Redmi A3Practical Impact
Design
Dimensions (mm)165 x 75.8 x 8.6168.3 x 76.3 x 8.3Redmi A3 is slightly larger and thinner. Negligible difference in daily use.
Weight (g)193.8193Virtually identical weight.
Display
Size (inches)6.566.71Redmi A3 has a slightly larger screen, providing a more immersive experience for media consumption.
Resolution (pixels)720 x 1612720 x 1650Both have similar HD+ resolution; sharpness will be comparable. Redmi A3's slightly taller aspect ratio might offer minor advantages for scrolling.
Refresh Rate (Hz)9090Both offer smooth scrolling and animations thanks to the 90Hz refresh rate.
Display TypeIPS LCDIPS LCDSimilar display technology; expect comparable color accuracy and viewing angles. Nokia G42 boasts higher typical and peak brightness (nits).
Performance
ChipsetSnapdragon 480+ 5GMediatek Helio G36Snapdragon 480+ 5G offers significantly better performance and 5G connectivity, resulting in smoother multitasking, faster app loading, and future-proof networking.
CPUOcta-core (2x2.2 GHz & 6x1.8 GHz)Octa-core (4x2.2 GHz & 4x1.6 GHz)Snapdragon 480+ has a more powerful architecture leading to better performance in demanding tasks.
GPUAdreno 619PowerVR GE8320Adreno 619 provides a better gaming and graphics performance compared to the PowerVR GE8320.
RAM (GB)4/6/83/4/6More RAM options available for the Nokia G42, with higher configurations enabling better multitasking.
Camera
Rear Camera50MP Main + 2MP Depth + 2MP Macro8MP Main + 0.3MP (unknown)Nokia G42 has a much higher resolution main sensor, potentially capturing more detailed photos. The practical impact of the 0.3MP sensor on the Redmi A3 is unclear.
Front Camera8MP5MPNokia G42's higher resolution front camera likely produces better selfies.
Video Recording1080p@30fps1080p@30fpsBoth offer basic video recording capabilities.
Battery
Capacity (mAh)50005000Identical battery capacity; expect similar battery life depending on usage.
Other
OSAndroid 13Android 14Redmi A3 ships with a newer Android version out of the box.
NFCYesYesBoth support contactless payments and data transfer.
5GYesNoNokia G42 offers faster cellular data speeds and improved network connectivity where 5G is available. This is a significant advantage.
Price RangeMediumLowRedmi A3 is significantly cheaper.

2. Key Differences Analysis

Nokia G42 Advantages:

  • Significantly better performance: The Snapdragon 480+ 5G chipset outperforms the Helio G36, providing a smoother user experience.
  • 5G Connectivity: Future-proofs the device and offers faster data speeds.
  • Higher Resolution Main Camera: Potentially better image quality.
  • More RAM options

Xiaomi Redmi A3 Advantages:

  • Lower Price: Significantly more affordable.
  • Newer Android Version: Ships with Android 14.
  • Dual Sim: Offers dual sim card functionality.

3. User Profiles & Recommendations

Nokia G42: Users who prioritize performance, 5G connectivity, and a decent camera, and are willing to pay a bit more. Suitable for:

  • Moderate to heavy smartphone users
  • Mobile gamers
  • Users in areas with 5G coverage

Xiaomi Redmi A3: Budget-conscious users who prioritize basic functionality and affordability over top-tier performance. Suitable for:

  • Light smartphone users
  • Primarily calling and texting
  • Basic social media browsing

4. Decision Framework

Key Questions for Buyers:

  1. What is your budget? The Redmi A3 is significantly cheaper.
  2. Do you need 5G connectivity? This is a major differentiator, as the Redmi A3 lacks 5G.
  3. How important is performance for your usage? The Nokia G42 provides a noticeable performance advantage.

Scenario-Based Recommendations:

  • Limited Budget: Redmi A3
  • Future-Proofing and Performance: Nokia G42
  • Basic Phone for Calling/Texting: Redmi A3
  • Gaming and Media Consumption: Nokia G42

My Choice: Nokia G42

While the Redmi A3 offers incredible value for its price, the Nokia G42's superior performance, 5G connectivity, and better main camera make it a more compelling choice for my needs. I prioritize a smooth user experience and future-proofing, and the Snapdragon 480+ 5G chipset provides a significant advantage in these areas. The price difference is justifiable for the long-term benefits of better performance and 5G. Although the Redmi A3 has a newer Android version out of the box, Nokia has a good track record of providing OS updates, mitigating this advantage. The significantly better camera in the Nokia G42 also heavily influences my decision.

Emily Harper
Emily Harper

Technology Insights Specialist

Dedicated technology writer specializing in mobile device analysis and technology communication. Expert at translating complex smartphone features into clear, actionable insights for diverse audiences.

Key Strengths:

  • Mobile technology analysis
  • Digital media communication
  • Technical storytelling
  • User-centric technology insights

Bridging technical complexity with engaging, accessible narratives.