Nokia G22 vs Xiaomi Redmi 13C - Detailed Phone Comparison

Detailed Comparison

Specification
Nokia G22
Nokia G22
Nokia

General

Launch Date February 25, 2023 November 10, 2023
Release Year 2023 2023

Physical

Volume 106.87 cm³ 106.14 cm³
Screen Size to Weight Ratio 3.31 "/g 3.51 "/g
Weight 196.2 g 192 g
Height 165 mm 168 mm
Width 76.2 mm 78 mm
Thickness 8.5 mm 8.1 mm
Foldable Design No No
Available Colors
  • Lagoon Blue
  • Meteor Gray
  • So Peach
  • Midnight Black
  • Glacier White
  • Navy Blue
  • Clover Green

Display

Screen Size 6.5 " 6.74 "
Resolution 720 x 1600 720 x 1600
Aspect Ratio 20:9 20:9
Screen-to-Body Ratio 81.1 % 83.7 %
Pixel Density 270 PPI 260 PPI
Refresh Rate 90 Hz 90 Hz
Typical Brightness 500 nits 450 nits
HBM Brightness N/A 600 nits
Peak Brightness N/A N/A

Hardware

Battery Capacity per Screen Area 119.53 mAh/in² 110.07 mAh/in²
Battery Density 47.25 mAh/cm³ 47.11 mAh/cm³
Battery Capacity 5050 mAh 5000 mAh
NFC Support Yes Yes
Chipset Unisoc T606 (12 nm) Mediatek MT6769Z Helio G85 (12 nm)
CPU Octa-core (2x1.6 GHz Cortex-A75 & 6x1.6 GHz Cortex-A55) Octa-core (2x2.0 GHz Cortex-A75 & 6x1.8 GHz Cortex-A55)
GPU Mali-G57 MP1 Mali-G52 MC2

Connectivity

USB Version 2.0 2.0
OTG Support 1
DisplayPort
DisplayPort Version N/A N/A
USB Features USB Type-C 2.0, OTG USB Type-C 2.0

Software

Operating System Android Android
Initial OS Version 12 13
Maximum OS Version

Comparison Summary

1. Specifications Comparison

FeatureNokia G22Xiaomi Redmi 13CPractical Impact
Design
Dimensions (mm)165 x 76.2 x 8.5168 x 78 x 8.1Redmi 13C is slightly larger. Negligible difference in daily use.
Weight (g)196.2192Redmi 13C is marginally lighter.
BuildNot specifiedNot specifiedBuild quality and materials unknown, impacting durability.
Display
Size (inches)6.56.74Redmi 13C offers a slightly larger screen for media consumption.
Resolution (pixels)720 x 1600720 x 1600Identical resolution, similar sharpness despite size difference.
Refresh Rate (Hz)9090Both offer smooth scrolling and animations.
Display TypeIPS LCDIPS LCDSimilar color accuracy and viewing angles expected.
Peak Brightness (nits)500 (typ)450 (typ), 600 (HBM)Redmi 13C may be slightly brighter in direct sunlight due to HBM.
Performance
ChipsetUnisoc T606 (12 nm)Mediatek Helio G85 (12 nm)Helio G85 generally offers better performance in benchmarks and real-world usage like gaming.
CPUOcta-core (2x1.6 GHz A75 & 6x1.6 GHz A55)Octa-core (2x2.0 GHz A75 & 6x1.8 GHz A55)Redmi 13C has faster CPU cores, leading to quicker app loading and multitasking.
GPUMali-G57 MP1Mali-G52 MC2Mali-G52 MC2 offers better gaming performance than the Mali-G57 MP1.
RAM (GB)44/6/8Redmi 13C offers configurations with more RAM, improving multitasking.
Storage (GB)64/128/256128/256Redmi 13C offers larger storage options.
Camera
Rear Camera (MP)50 + 2 + 250 + 2 + 0.8Similar main camera sensor, but Redmi 13C has a less useful third lens.
Front Camera (MP)88Similar selfie camera resolution.
Video Recording1080p@30fps1080p@30fpsIdentical video recording capabilities. Redmi 13C claims 120fps slow motion but resolution is unclear.
Battery
Capacity (mAh)50505000Negligible difference in battery capacity. Real-world battery life will depend on usage and optimization.
Charging (W)20W18WNokia G22 charges slightly faster.

2. Key Differences Analysis

Nokia G22 Advantages:

  • Slightly faster charging: 20W vs 18W.
  • Potentially better repairability: While not explicitly stated, Nokia emphasizes repairability in its marketing, suggesting easier self-repair or lower repair costs.

Xiaomi Redmi 13C Advantages:

  • Better performance: The Helio G85 chipset and faster CPU/GPU offer a smoother user experience, especially for gaming and demanding tasks.
  • Larger display: The 6.74" screen provides a more immersive experience for media consumption.
  • Higher RAM options: Configurations with up to 8GB RAM ensure smoother multitasking.
  • Larger storage options: Up to 256GB provides ample space for apps, photos, and videos.
  • Brighter Display (HBM): Better outdoor visibility.

3. User Profiles & Recommendations

Nokia G22: Budget-conscious users prioritizing battery life, basic functionality, and potential ease of repair. Suitable for light usage such as calling, texting, and browsing.

Xiaomi Redmi 13C: Users seeking better performance and a larger display for gaming, media consumption, and multitasking on a budget. Suitable for moderate to heavy usage. Better value due to performance advantage.

4. Decision Framework

Key Questions for Buyers:

  1. What is your budget? Both are budget phones, but the Redmi 13C might offer better value depending on specific RAM/storage configurations.
  2. What is your primary use case? For basic usage, the Nokia G22 suffices. For gaming and media, the Redmi 13C is superior.
  3. How important is long-term repairability? If self-repair or lower repair costs are a priority, the Nokia G22 might be a better choice.

Scenario-Based Recommendations:

  • Student on a tight budget: Redmi 13C (base model) for better performance for online learning and entertainment.
  • Casual user needing a reliable phone: Nokia G22 for simplicity and battery life.
  • Mobile gamer on a budget: Redmi 13C for better gaming performance.

My Choice: Xiaomi Redmi 13C

The Xiaomi Redmi 13C offers significantly better performance thanks to its superior processor and higher RAM options, making it a more future-proof device. The larger display enhances media consumption, and while the charging is slightly slower, the overall user experience will be considerably smoother. The price difference, if any, is likely outweighed by the performance and usability advantages of the Redmi 13C, making it a better value proposition for most users. While I appreciate Nokia's emphasis on repairability, the performance difference is too significant to ignore. The availability of larger RAM and storage options also contributes to a better long-term experience.

Emily Harper
Emily Harper

Technology Insights Specialist

Dedicated technology writer specializing in mobile device analysis and technology communication. Expert at translating complex smartphone features into clear, actionable insights for diverse audiences.

Key Strengths:

  • Mobile technology analysis
  • Digital media communication
  • Technical storytelling
  • User-centric technology insights

Bridging technical complexity with engaging, accessible narratives.