Nokia G22 vs Realme C51 - Detailed Phone Comparison

Detailed Comparison

Specification
Nokia G22
Nokia G22
Nokia
Realme C51
Realme C51
Realme

General

Launch Date February 25, 2023 August 1, 2023
Release Year 2023 2023

Physical

Volume 106.87 cm³ 102.59 cm³
Screen Size to Weight Ratio 3.31 "/g 3.62 "/g
Weight 196.2 g 186 g
Height 165 mm 167.2 mm
Width 76.2 mm 76.7 mm
Thickness 8.5 mm 8 mm
Foldable Design No No
Available Colors
  • Lagoon Blue
  • Meteor Gray
  • So Peach
  • Mint Green
  • Carbon Black

Display

Screen Size 6.5 " 6.74 "
Resolution 720 x 1600 720 x 1600
Aspect Ratio 20:9 20:9
Screen-to-Body Ratio 81.1 % 85.5 %
Pixel Density 270 PPI 260 PPI
Refresh Rate 90 Hz 90 Hz
Typical Brightness 500 nits N/A
HBM Brightness N/A N/A
Peak Brightness N/A 560 nits

Hardware

Battery Capacity per Screen Area 119.53 mAh/in² 110.07 mAh/in²
Battery Density 47.25 mAh/cm³ 48.74 mAh/cm³
Battery Capacity 5050 mAh 5000 mAh
NFC Support Yes Yes
Chipset Unisoc T606 (12 nm) Unisoc Tiger T612 (12 nm)
CPU Octa-core (2x1.6 GHz Cortex-A75 & 6x1.6 GHz Cortex-A55) Octa-core (2x1.8 GHz Cortex-A75 & 6x1.8 GHz Cortex-A55)
GPU Mali-G57 MP1 Mali-G57

Connectivity

USB Version 2.0 2.0
OTG Support 1 1
DisplayPort
DisplayPort Version N/A N/A
USB Features USB Type-C 2.0, OTG USB Type-C 2.0, OTG

Software

Operating System Android Android
Initial OS Version 12 13
Maximum OS Version

Comparison Summary

1. Specifications Comparison

FeatureNokia G22Realme C51Practical Impact
Design
Dimensions (mm)165 x 76.2 x 8.5167.2 x 76.7 x 8Realme C51 is slightly larger and wider.
Weight (g)196.2186Nokia G22 is noticeably heavier.
Build MaterialsNot specifiedNot specifiedCannot compare build quality and durability.
Display
Size (inches)6.56.74Realme C51 offers a larger screen for more immersive content consumption.
Resolution (pixels)720 x 1600720 x 1600Identical resolution, but Realme C51 has a slightly lower pixel density (260 vs 270 ppi) due to the larger screen. Difference is negligible in practice.
Refresh Rate (Hz)9090Both offer smooth scrolling and animations thanks to the 90Hz refresh rate.
Display TypeIPS LCDIPS LCDBoth use IPS LCD technology, expecting similar color accuracy and viewing angles.
Performance
ChipsetUnisoc T606 (12 nm)Unisoc Tiger T612 (12 nm)Realme C51 has a slightly faster CPU with higher clocked cores (1.8 GHz vs 1.6 GHz) likely resulting in slightly improved performance in demanding tasks.
CPUOcta-core (2x1.6 GHz Cortex-A75 & 6x1.6 GHz Cortex-A55)Octa-core (2x1.8 GHz Cortex-A75 & 6x1.8 GHz Cortex-A55)Realme C51's higher clock speed should translate to smoother multitasking and app loading.
GPUMali-G57 MP1Mali-G57 MP1Similar GPUs, expecting comparable gaming performance, though the slightly faster CPU in the Realme C51 might offer a minor advantage.
RAM (GB)44Both have the same RAM, meaning similar multitasking capabilities.
Camera
Main Camera (MP)5050Both feature a 50MP main sensor, likely using the same Samsung S5KJN1 sensor. Image quality should be comparable.
Other Cameras2MP Depth, 2MP Macro0.8MP DepthNokia G22 has a dedicated macro lens, which may offer slightly better close-up shots, though 2MP is still low resolution. Realme C51's secondary camera is practically useless at 0.8MP.
Selfie Camera (MP)85Nokia G22 has a higher resolution selfie camera, potentially capturing more detail.
Battery
Capacity (mAh)50505000Negligible difference in battery capacity. Real-world battery life will depend more on usage patterns and software optimization.
Fast Charging (W)2033Realme C51 supports significantly faster charging, reducing downtime considerably.

2. Key Differences Analysis

Nokia G22 Advantages:

  • Slightly higher resolution selfie camera: Potentially better selfies.
  • Dedicated macro lens: May provide slightly better close-up shots.
  • Potentially wider availability of repair parts: Marketed for easy repairability.

Realme C51 Advantages:

  • Larger Display: More immersive media consumption.
  • Faster CPU: Smoother performance for demanding tasks and multitasking.
  • Significantly faster charging: Less downtime.
  • Slightly lighter: More comfortable for extended use.

Trade-offs:

  • Nokia G22: Slower performance and charging in exchange for potential repairability and a slightly better selfie camera.
  • Realme C51: Larger size might be less pocketable. Unknown repairability.

3. User Profiles & Recommendations

Nokia G22: Users who prioritize repairability, want a decent selfie camera, and are on a tight budget. Suitable for basic tasks like calling, texting, browsing, and casual photography.

Realme C51: Users who prioritize a larger display, faster performance, and quick charging. Suitable for media consumption, gaming, and moderate multitasking.

4. Decision Framework

Key Questions for Buyers:

  1. What is your budget? The Nokia G22 is positioned in the "low price" range, while the Realme C51 is "medium price."
  2. What is your primary use case? Basic tasks vs. demanding apps and media consumption.
  3. How important is repairability and a good selfie camera?

Scenario-Based Recommendations:

  • Tight Budget, Basic Use: Nokia G22
  • Moderate Budget, Larger Screen and Performance: Realme C51

My Choice: Realme C51

While the Nokia G22's repairability focus is commendable, the Realme C51 offers a more compelling overall package for my needs. The faster processor, larger display, and significantly quicker charging are substantial benefits that outweigh the slightly better selfie camera and potential macro advantage of the Nokia G22. The performance difference, while perhaps not massive, would likely be noticeable in day-to-day use. The faster charging is a significant convenience. Finally, while I appreciate the repairability of the G22, the lack of specific details on availability and cost of parts makes it difficult to fully assess this advantage. The Realme C51 provides a more well-rounded and future-proof experience.

Emily Harper
Emily Harper

Technology Insights Specialist

Dedicated technology writer specializing in mobile device analysis and technology communication. Expert at translating complex smartphone features into clear, actionable insights for diverse audiences.

Key Strengths:

  • Mobile technology analysis
  • Digital media communication
  • Technical storytelling
  • User-centric technology insights

Bridging technical complexity with engaging, accessible narratives.