Nokia G22 vs Oppo Find N3 Flip - Detailed Phone Comparison

Detailed Comparison

Specification
Nokia G22
Nokia G22
Nokia

General

Launch Date February 25, 2023 September 8, 2023
Release Year 2023 2023

Physical

Volume 106.87 cm³ 98.38 cm³
Screen Size to Weight Ratio 3.31 "/g 3.43 "/g
Weight 196.2 g 198 g
Height 165 mm 166.4 mm
Width 76.2 mm 75.8 mm
Thickness 8.5 mm 7.8 mm
Foldable Design No Yes
Available Colors
  • Lagoon Blue
  • Meteor Gray
  • So Peach
  • Cream Gold
  • Misty Pink
  • Sleek Black

Display

Screen Size 6.5 " 6.8 "
Resolution 720 x 1600 1080 x 2520
Aspect Ratio 20:9 21:9
Screen-to-Body Ratio 81.1 % 85.6 %
Pixel Density 270 PPI 403 PPI
Refresh Rate 90 Hz 120 Hz
Typical Brightness 500 nits N/A
HBM Brightness N/A 1200 nits
Peak Brightness N/A 1600 nits

Hardware

Battery Capacity per Screen Area 119.53 mAh/in² 92.99 mAh/in²
Battery Density 47.25 mAh/cm³ 43.71 mAh/cm³
Battery Capacity 5050 mAh 4300 mAh
NFC Support Yes Yes
Chipset Unisoc T606 (12 nm) Mediatek Dimensity 9200 (4 nm)
CPU Octa-core (2x1.6 GHz Cortex-A75 & 6x1.6 GHz Cortex-A55) Octa-core (1x3.05 GHz Cortex-X3 & 3x2.85 GHz Cortex-A715 & 4x1.80 GHz Cortex-A510)
GPU Mali-G57 MP1 Immortalis-G715 MC11

Connectivity

USB Version 2.0 2.0
OTG Support 1 1
DisplayPort
DisplayPort Version N/A N/A
USB Features USB Type-C 2.0, OTG USB Type-C 2.0, OTG

Software

Operating System Android Android
Initial OS Version 12 13
Maximum OS Version 17

Comparison Summary

1. Specifications Comparison

FeatureNokia G22Oppo Find N3 FlipPractical Impact
Design
Dimensions (mm)165 x 76.2 x 8.5166.4 x 75.8 x 7.8Oppo is slightly shorter and noticeably thinner when folded.
Weight (g)196.2198Negligible weight difference.
FoldableNoYesOppo's foldable design offers portability and a unique form factor.
Display
Display TypeIPS LCDFoldable LTPO AMOLEDOppo offers superior contrast, deeper blacks, and potentially better power efficiency due to LTPO.
Size (inches)6.56.8Oppo has a larger screen.
Resolution (px)720 x 16001080 x 2520Oppo has a significantly sharper display.
Refresh Rate (Hz)90120Oppo offers smoother scrolling and animations.
Peak Brightness (nits)500 (typ)1600 (peak)Oppo will be much more readable in direct sunlight.
Performance
ChipsetUnisoc T606 (12 nm)Mediatek Dimensity 9200 (4 nm)Oppo has a vastly more powerful processor, leading to significantly faster performance in demanding tasks and games.
CPUOcta-core (2x1.6 GHz A75 & 6x1.6 GHz A55)Octa-core (1x3.05 GHz X3 & 3x2.85 GHz A715 & 4x1.80 GHz A510)Oppo's CPU offers a substantial performance advantage.
GPUMali-G57 MP1Immortalis-G715 MC11Oppo's GPU is significantly more powerful, enabling smoother gaming and faster graphics rendering.
RAM (GB)412Oppo offers much more RAM for multitasking and demanding applications.
Camera
Main Camera (MP)5050Resolution is similar but sensor and lens quality information is incomplete for comparison.
Other Cameras2MP Depth, 2MP Macro, 8MP Selfie48MP Wide Angle + Macro, 32MP Telephoto, 32MP SelfieOppo offers a more versatile camera system with a higher resolution ultrawide and a dedicated telephoto lens.
Video Recording1080p@30fps4K@30fps with EIS, up to 1080p@240fps with EISOppo offers higher resolution video recording with electronic image stabilization and high frame rate options.
Battery
Capacity (mAh)50504300Nokia has a larger battery capacity.
Fast Charging (W)2044Oppo supports much faster charging.

2. Key Differences Analysis

Nokia G22 Advantages:

  • Lower Price: Significantly more affordable.
  • Larger Battery: Potentially longer battery life for basic usage.
  • Replaceable Parts: Designed for easy self-repair.

Oppo Find N3 Flip Advantages:

  • Significantly More Powerful: Superior performance in all aspects.
  • Higher Quality Display: Brighter, sharper, and smoother.
  • More Versatile Camera System: Telephoto lens and higher quality sensors likely produce better images and videos.
  • Foldable Design: Increased portability and unique form factor.
  • Faster Charging: Significantly reduces charging time.

Trade-offs:

  • Nokia sacrifices performance, display quality, and camera features for affordability and repairability.
  • Oppo sacrifices battery capacity and affordability for high-end features and performance.

3. User Profiles & Recommendations

Nokia G22: Budget-conscious users who prioritize basic communication, simple tasks, and long battery life. Suitable for light users or as a secondary device.

Oppo Find N3 Flip: Users who demand high performance, a premium display, a versatile camera system, and appreciate the innovative foldable design. Ideal for power users, content creators, and those seeking a flagship experience.

4. Decision Framework

Key Questions for Buyers:

  1. What is your budget? The Nokia G22 is significantly cheaper.
  2. What are your primary use cases? Basic tasks vs. demanding applications, gaming, and content creation.
  3. Do you value portability and a unique design? The Oppo's foldable design offers both.

Scenario-Based Recommendations:

  • Limited Budget, Basic Use: Nokia G22
  • High Performance and Premium Features: Oppo Find N3 Flip
  • Portability and Style: Oppo Find N3 Flip

My Choice: Oppo Find N3 Flip

While the Nokia G22 offers excellent value for its price, the Oppo Find N3 Flip is the clear winner for me. The significantly improved performance, superior display, versatile camera system, faster charging, and innovative foldable design outweigh the price difference and smaller battery. As someone who values a smooth user experience, high-quality visuals, and the ability to quickly capture moments, the Oppo aligns better with my needs. The foldable form factor is a bonus, offering increased portability without sacrificing screen size. While the Nokia G22 serves a specific niche, the Oppo Find N3 Flip offers a more compelling overall package for a wider range of users.

Emily Harper
Emily Harper

Technology Insights Specialist

Dedicated technology writer specializing in mobile device analysis and technology communication. Expert at translating complex smartphone features into clear, actionable insights for diverse audiences.

Key Strengths:

  • Mobile technology analysis
  • Digital media communication
  • Technical storytelling
  • User-centric technology insights

Bridging technical complexity with engaging, accessible narratives.