Nokia G22 vs Motorola Moto G (2023) - Detailed Phone Comparison

Detailed Comparison

Specification
Nokia G22
Nokia G22
Nokia

General

Launch Date February 25, 2023 May 25, 2023
Release Year 2023 2023

Physical

Volume 106.87 cm³ 103.32 cm³
Screen Size to Weight Ratio 3.31 "/g 3.44 "/g
Weight 196.2 g 189 g
Height 165 mm 164 mm
Width 76.2 mm 75 mm
Thickness 8.5 mm 8.4 mm
Foldable Design No No
Available Colors
  • Lagoon Blue
  • Meteor Gray
  • So Peach
  • Ink Blue

Display

Screen Size 6.5 " 6.5 "
Resolution 720 x 1600 720 x 1600
Aspect Ratio 20:9 20:9
Screen-to-Body Ratio 81.1 % 82.9 %
Pixel Density 270 PPI 270 PPI
Refresh Rate 90 Hz 120 Hz
Typical Brightness 500 nits N/A
HBM Brightness N/A N/A
Peak Brightness N/A N/A

Hardware

Battery Capacity per Screen Area 119.53 mAh/in² 118.34 mAh/in²
Battery Density 47.25 mAh/cm³ 48.39 mAh/cm³
Battery Capacity 5050 mAh 5000 mAh
NFC Support Yes No
Chipset Unisoc T606 (12 nm) Qualcomm SM4350-AC Snapdragon 480+ 5G (8 nm)
CPU Octa-core (2x1.6 GHz Cortex-A75 & 6x1.6 GHz Cortex-A55) Octa-core (2x2.2 GHz Kryo 460 & 6x1.8 GHz Kryo 460)
GPU Mali-G57 MP1 Adreno 619

Connectivity

USB Version 2.0 2.0
OTG Support 1
DisplayPort
DisplayPort Version N/A N/A
USB Features USB Type-C 2.0, OTG USB Type-C 2.0

Software

Operating System Android Android
Initial OS Version 12 13
Maximum OS Version

Comparison Summary

1. Specifications Comparison

FeatureNokia G22Motorola Moto G (2023)Practical Impact
Design
Dimensions (mm)165 x 76.2 x 8.5164 x 75 x 8.4Negligible size difference; both feel similar in hand.
Weight (g)196.2189Nokia G22 slightly heavier, but the difference is minimal.
Build MaterialNot specifiedNot specifiedCannot compare build quality and durability without this information.
Display
Display Size (inches)6.56.5Same screen size.
Resolution (pixels)720 x 1600720 x 1600Identical resolution; both offer similar sharpness.
Refresh Rate (Hz)90120Moto G (2023) offers smoother scrolling and animations due to the higher refresh rate.
Display TypeIPS LCDIPS LCDBoth use IPS LCD technology, implying similar color accuracy and viewing angles.
Performance
ChipsetUnisoc T606 (12 nm)Qualcomm Snapdragon 480+ 5G (8 nm)Snapdragon 480+ 5G is generally more powerful and efficient due to the smaller manufacturing process.
CPUOcta-core (2x1.6 GHz Cortex-A75 & 6x1.6 GHz Cortex-A55)Octa-core (2x2.2 GHz Kryo 460 & 6x1.8 GHz Kryo 460)Moto G (2023) has faster CPU cores, leading to better performance in demanding tasks.
GPUMali-G57 MP1Adreno 619Adreno 619 offers superior graphics performance for gaming and media consumption.
RAM (GB)44Same RAM capacity; both can handle multitasking similarly.
Camera
Rear Camera (MP)50 + 2 + 248 + 2Nokia G22 boasts a slightly higher resolution main sensor, but practical image quality depends on various factors not listed here.
Front Camera (MP)88Same front camera resolution.
Video Recording1080p@30fps1080p@30fpsBoth offer similar video recording capabilities.
Battery
Capacity (mAh)50505000Negligible difference in battery capacity, expecting similar battery life.
Fast Charging20W15WNokia G22 offers slightly faster charging.
Other
NFCYesNoNokia G22 supports contactless payments and data transfer via NFC, while Moto G (2023) doesn't.
5GNoYesMoto G (2023) offers faster cellular data speeds and improved network connectivity where 5G is available.
OSAndroid 12Android 13Moto G (2023) comes with a newer Android version, offering potential performance and feature benefits.

2. Key Differences Analysis

Nokia G22 Advantages:

  • NFC: Enables contactless payments and other NFC functionalities.
  • Slightly Faster Charging: Offers quicker charging times.
  • Potentially Better Main Camera: Higher resolution main sensor, but real-world performance depends on factors beyond resolution.

Motorola Moto G (2023) Advantages:

  • Significantly Better Performance: Snapdragon 480+ 5G and Adreno 619 offer a smoother and more responsive user experience, especially in gaming and multitasking.
  • Higher Refresh Rate Display: Provides smoother scrolling and animations.
  • 5G Connectivity: Offers significantly faster data speeds and improved network performance where available.
  • Newer Android Version: Android 13 might offer performance and feature advantages.

3. User Profiles & Recommendations

Nokia G22: Budget-conscious users who prioritize NFC functionality for contactless payments and require decent battery life. Best for basic tasks like calling, texting, web browsing, and social media.

Motorola Moto G (2023): Users who prioritize performance, smoother display, and future-proof 5G connectivity. Suitable for users who engage in more demanding tasks like gaming, media consumption, and multitasking, and live in an area with 5G coverage.

4. Decision Framework

Key Questions for Buyers:

  1. Is 5G connectivity crucial? If yes, the Moto G (2023) is the only option.
  2. Is NFC a must-have? If yes, the Nokia G22 is the better choice.
  3. What is your budget and performance expectation? If performance and a smoother display are important and budget allows, the Moto G (2023) offers better value.

My Choice: Motorola Moto G (2023)

While the Nokia G22 offers NFC and slightly faster charging, the Moto G (2023)'s superior performance, 5G connectivity, 120Hz display, and newer Android version make it a more compelling overall package. The Snapdragon 480+ 5G offers a significant performance advantage over the Unisoc T606, making the Moto G (2023) better suited for a wider range of tasks and future-proofing the device. The lack of NFC is a drawback, but the benefits in performance and connectivity outweigh this for me personally. I value a smooth and responsive user experience and the long-term benefits of 5G.

Emily Harper
Emily Harper

Technology Insights Specialist

Dedicated technology writer specializing in mobile device analysis and technology communication. Expert at translating complex smartphone features into clear, actionable insights for diverse audiences.

Key Strengths:

  • Mobile technology analysis
  • Digital media communication
  • Technical storytelling
  • User-centric technology insights

Bridging technical complexity with engaging, accessible narratives.