Nokia G22 vs Google Pixel Fold - Detailed Phone Comparison

Detailed Comparison

Specification
Nokia G22
Nokia G22
Nokia

General

Launch Date February 25, 2023 June 27, 2023
Release Year 2023 2023

Physical

Volume 106.87 cm³ 128.59 cm³
Screen Size to Weight Ratio 3.31 "/g 2.69 "/g
Weight 196.2 g 283 g
Height 165 mm 139.7 mm
Width 76.2 mm 158.7 mm
Thickness 8.5 mm 5.8 mm
Foldable Design No Yes
Available Colors
  • Lagoon Blue
  • Meteor Gray
  • So Peach
  • Obsidian
  • Porcelain

Display

Screen Size 6.5 " 7.6 "
Resolution 720 x 1600 1840 x 2208
Aspect Ratio 20:9 16:9
Screen-to-Body Ratio 81.1 % 82.7 %
Pixel Density 270 PPI 378 PPI
Refresh Rate 90 Hz 120 Hz
Typical Brightness 500 nits N/A
HBM Brightness N/A 1000 nits
Peak Brightness N/A 1450 nits

Hardware

Battery Capacity per Screen Area 119.53 mAh/in² 83.47 mAh/in²
Battery Density 47.25 mAh/cm³ 37.49 mAh/cm³
Battery Capacity 5050 mAh 4821 mAh
NFC Support Yes Yes
Chipset Unisoc T606 (12 nm) Google Tensor G2 (5 nm)
CPU Octa-core (2x1.6 GHz Cortex-A75 & 6x1.6 GHz Cortex-A55) Octa-core (2x2.85 GHz Cortex-X1 & 2x2.35 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x1.80 GHz Cortex-A55)
GPU Mali-G57 MP1 Mali-G710 MP7

Connectivity

USB Version 2.0 3.2
OTG Support 1 1
DisplayPort
DisplayPort Version N/A N/A
USB Features USB Type-C 2.0, OTG USB Type-C 3.2, OTG

Software

Operating System Android Android
Initial OS Version 12 13
Maximum OS Version 14

Comparison Summary

1. Specifications Comparison

FeatureNokia G22Google Pixel FoldPractical Impact
Design
Dimensions (mm)165 x 76.2 x 8.5139.7 x 158.7 x 5.8Pixel Fold is significantly wider due to its folding design, but thinner when folded. G22 is taller and thicker.
Weight (g)196.2283Pixel Fold is considerably heavier.
FoldableNoYesPixel Fold offers a larger screen in a pocketable size due to its folding capability.
Build MaterialMissingMissingMaterial affects durability and premium feel; information unavailable for comparison.
Display
Display TypeIPS LCDFoldable OLEDOLED generally offers better contrast, deeper blacks, and wider viewing angles than IPS LCD.
Display Size (inches)6.57.6 (unfolded) 5.8 (folded)Pixel Fold provides a much larger main display for multitasking and media consumption.
Resolution (pixels)720 x 16002208 x 1840 (unfolded) 1080 x 2092 (folded)Pixel Fold boasts significantly higher resolution leading to sharper text and images.
Refresh Rate (Hz)90120Pixel Fold's higher refresh rate results in smoother animations and scrolling.
Performance
ChipsetUnisoc T606 (12 nm)Google Tensor G2 (5 nm)Tensor G2 is a much more powerful chip, enabling significantly faster performance and better AI capabilities.
CPUOcta-core (2x1.6 GHz Cortex-A75 & 6x1.6 GHz Cortex-A55)Octa-core (2x2.85 GHz Cortex-X1 & 2x2.35 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x1.80 GHz Cortex-A55)Pixel Fold's CPU offers significantly higher clock speeds and more powerful cores, resulting in a major performance advantage.
GPUMali-G57 MP1Mali-G710 MP7Pixel Fold's GPU is considerably more powerful, enabling smoother gaming and faster graphics rendering.
RAM (GB)412Pixel Fold's larger RAM allows for more apps to run in the background without performance slowdowns.
Camera
Rear Camera (MP)50 MP Main, 2 MP Depth, 2 MP Macro48 MP Main, 10.8 MP Wide, 10.8 MP TelephotoBoth have multiple cameras, but the Pixel Fold offers higher quality lenses and advanced computational photography capabilities thanks to the Tensor G2 chip.
DXOMARK ScoreMissing133DXOMARK provides an objective measure of camera quality; Pixel Fold's score indicates excellent camera performance.
Battery
Capacity (mAh)50504821While the G22 has a slightly larger battery, the Pixel Fold's more efficient processor may result in comparable battery life. Real-world usage will vary.
Fast Charging20W30WPixel Fold supports faster charging.

2. Key Differences Analysis

Nokia G22 Advantages:

  • Lower Price: Significantly more affordable.
  • Potentially Longer Battery Life: Larger battery capacity, though real-world results may vary due to processor efficiency differences.
  • Easier to handle: Lighter and less bulky than the Pixel Fold.

Google Pixel Fold Advantages:

  • Significantly More Powerful: Superior processor, GPU, and RAM for smoother performance and multitasking.
  • Superior Camera System: Higher quality lenses, more versatile camera setup, and advanced computational photography features.
  • Larger, Higher Quality Display: Foldable OLED display offers vibrant colors, deeper blacks, and a larger screen size for immersive experiences.
  • Foldable Design: Provides a large screen in a more pocketable form factor.

Trade-offs:

  • Price: The Pixel Fold's premium features come at a significantly higher price.
  • Size and Weight: The Pixel Fold's foldable design makes it larger and heavier than the G22.
  • Complexity: Foldable phones introduce potential durability concerns and added complexity.

3. User Profiles & Recommendations

Nokia G22: Ideal for budget-conscious users who prioritize basic functionality, long battery life, and ease of use. Suitable for:

  • Calling, texting, and web browsing
  • Casual social media use
  • Light gaming

Google Pixel Fold: Ideal for users who demand top-tier performance, a cutting-edge camera system, and a large, high-quality display. Suitable for:

  • Power users who multitask heavily
  • Content creators and photographers
  • Enthusiasts who want the latest technology
  • Users who value portability and a large screen

4. Decision Framework

Key Questions for Buyers:

  1. What is your budget? The Pixel Fold is significantly more expensive.
  2. What are your primary smartphone usage patterns? Do you need top-tier performance or just basic functionality?
  3. How important is portability and screen size? The Pixel Fold offers a larger screen but is also heavier and bulkier.

My Choice: Google Pixel Fold

While the Nokia G22 offers excellent value for its price, I would choose the Google Pixel Fold. The significantly superior performance, camera system, and the innovative foldable display are compelling. The Tensor G2 chip provides a substantial advantage in speed, AI capabilities, and overall user experience. Although the price is high, the Pixel Fold represents a leap forward in mobile technology and offers a unique user experience. I prioritize performance, a great camera, and a large, high-quality display, making the Pixel Fold the better choice for my needs despite its higher price and increased weight. The foldable form factor, while introducing potential durability concerns, ultimately offers a compelling combination of portability and large screen real estate that suits my usage patterns.

Emily Harper
Emily Harper

Technology Insights Specialist

Dedicated technology writer specializing in mobile device analysis and technology communication. Expert at translating complex smartphone features into clear, actionable insights for diverse audiences.

Key Strengths:

  • Mobile technology analysis
  • Digital media communication
  • Technical storytelling
  • User-centric technology insights

Bridging technical complexity with engaging, accessible narratives.