Nokia G11 vs Samsung Galaxy A35 - Detailed Phone Comparison

Detailed Comparison

Specification
Nokia G11
Nokia G11
Nokia

General

Launch Date March 24, 2022 March 15, 2024
Release Year 2022 2024

Physical

Volume 106.19 cm³ 103.42 cm³
Screen Size to Weight Ratio 3.44 "/g 3.16 "/g
Weight 189 g 209 g
Height 164.6 mm 161.7 mm
Width 75.9 mm 78 mm
Thickness 8.5 mm 8.2 mm
Foldable Design No No
Available Colors
  • Charcoal
  • Ice
  • Navy
  • Iceblue
  • Lilac
  • Lemon

Display

Screen Size 6.5 " 6.6 "
Resolution 720 x 1600 1080 x 2340
Aspect Ratio 20:9 19.5:9
Screen-to-Body Ratio 81.6 % 84.8 %
Pixel Density 270 PPI 390 PPI
Refresh Rate 90 Hz 120 Hz
Typical Brightness N/A N/A
HBM Brightness N/A 1000 nits
Peak Brightness N/A N/A

Hardware

Battery Capacity per Screen Area 119.53 mAh/in² 114.78 mAh/in²
Battery Density 47.56 mAh/cm³ 48.34 mAh/cm³
Battery Capacity 5050 mAh 5000 mAh
NFC Support Yes Yes
Chipset Unisoc T606 (12 nm) Exynos 1380 (5 nm)
CPU Octa-core (2x1.6 GHz Cortex-A75 & 6x1.6 GHz Cortex-A55) Octa-core (4x2.4 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55)
GPU Mali-G57 MP1 Mali-G68 MP5

Connectivity

USB Version 2.0 2.0
OTG Support 1 1
DisplayPort
DisplayPort Version N/A N/A
USB Features USB Type-C 2.0, OTG USB Type-C 2.0, OTG

Software

Operating System Android Android
Initial OS Version 11 14
Maximum OS Version 18

Comparison Summary

Let's dive into a comparative analysis of the Nokia G11 and Samsung Galaxy A35, focusing on the user experience rather than just specs.

1. Design and Usability Assessment:

FeatureNokia G11Samsung Galaxy A35User Experience Impact
Interface DesignBasic Android 11One UI on top of Android 14A35 offers a more modern, customizable interface potentially with more features and smoother animations.
Interaction FlowStandard Android navigationPotentially gesture-based, depends on One UIA35 likely provides more intuitive and flexible navigation options.
Accessibility FeaturesStandard Android accessibility optionsOne UI enhanced accessibility featuresA35 may include more robust accessibility features for users with diverse needs.
Design ErgonomicsPlastic body, 189gLikely a more premium material, 209gA35 might feel more premium in hand but slightly heavier; both phones are reasonably sized for one-handed use.
Display6.5" IPS LCD (720x1600), 90Hz6.6" Super AMOLED (1080x2340), 120HzA35 boasts a significantly sharper, more vibrant display with smoother scrolling and better outdoor visibility.

2. Narrative-Driven Feature Exploration:

Scenario: Imagine a student using their phone for note-taking, web browsing, and casual gaming.

  • Nokia G11: The student might find the G11 functional but lacking in responsiveness and visual clarity. The lower resolution display and 90Hz refresh rate could make extended reading and web browsing less enjoyable. The battery life, however, would be a strong point for all-day use.
  • Samsung Galaxy A35: The student would likely appreciate the A35's crisp AMOLED display and smoother 120Hz refresh rate, making note-taking and web browsing more engaging. The more powerful processor would also handle multitasking and light gaming with ease.

3. Inclusive Technology Evaluation:

  • For budget-conscious users: The Nokia G11 provides essential smartphone functionalities at an affordable price.
  • For users who prioritize display quality and performance: The Samsung Galaxy A35 offers a superior multimedia experience.
  • For older adults: Both phones have large displays for easier readability, but the A35's One UI might offer simpler customization options.

4. Design-Centric Decision Framework:

The Nokia G11 prioritizes affordability and long battery life, sacrificing display quality and performance. The Samsung Galaxy A35 focuses on a richer multimedia experience and smoother performance, at a higher price point.

My Choice:

I would choose the Samsung Galaxy A35. While the Nokia G11 provides excellent value, my user-centered approach leans towards the superior user experience offered by the A35. The vibrant AMOLED display, higher refresh rate, and faster processor contribute significantly to a more engaging and enjoyable user experience in everyday tasks. The more modern OS and potentially more feature-rich One UI also provides a more enjoyable and personalized smartphone experience. While the price difference is notable, the long-term benefits of a smoother, more visually appealing, and powerful device outweigh the initial cost for me. The A35 better reflects the current trends in mobile technology design, prioritizing a rich and responsive user interface.

Sophia Rodriguez
Sophia Rodriguez

Technology Communications Specialist

Expert in transforming complex technological innovations into accessible, engaging narratives.

Key Strengths:

  • Technology storytelling
  • User experience design analysis
  • Inclusive technology communication
  • Design-driven technology insights

Bridging technical complexity with human-centered understanding.