Nokia G11 vs Samsung Galaxy A04e - Detailed Phone Comparison

Detailed Comparison

Specification
Nokia G11
Nokia G11
Nokia

General

Launch Date March 24, 2022 November 7, 2022
Release Year 2022 2022

Physical

Volume 106.19 cm³ 113.41 cm³
Screen Size to Weight Ratio 3.44 "/g 3.46 "/g
Weight 189 g 188 g
Height 164.6 mm 164.2 mm
Width 75.9 mm 75.9 mm
Thickness 8.5 mm 9.1 mm
Foldable Design No No
Available Colors
  • Charcoal
  • Ice
  • Black
  • Light Blue
  • Copper

Display

Screen Size 6.5 " 6.5 "
Resolution 720 x 1600 720 x 1600
Aspect Ratio 20:9 20:9
Screen-to-Body Ratio 81.6 % 81.8 %
Pixel Density 270 PPI 270 PPI
Refresh Rate 90 Hz N/A
Typical Brightness N/A N/A
HBM Brightness N/A N/A
Peak Brightness N/A N/A

Hardware

Battery Capacity per Screen Area 119.53 mAh/in² 118.34 mAh/in²
Battery Density 47.56 mAh/cm³ 44.09 mAh/cm³
Battery Capacity 5050 mAh 5000 mAh
NFC Support Yes No
Chipset Unisoc T606 (12 nm) Mediatek MT6765 Helio P35 (12 nm)
CPU Octa-core (2x1.6 GHz Cortex-A75 & 6x1.6 GHz Cortex-A55) Octa-core (4x2.3 GHz Cortex-A53 & 4x1.8 GHz Cortex-A53)
GPU Mali-G57 MP1 PowerVR GE8320

Connectivity

USB Version 2.0 2.0
OTG Support 1 1
DisplayPort
DisplayPort Version N/A N/A
USB Features USB Type-C 2.0, OTG USB Type-C 2.0, OTG

Software

Operating System Android Android
Initial OS Version 11 12
Maximum OS Version

Comparison Summary

Nokia G11 vs. Samsung Galaxy A04e: A User-Centered Comparison

Let's dive beyond the spec sheet and explore the Nokia G11 and Samsung Galaxy A04e as experiences, not just devices. We'll use a narrative approach to understand how these phones fit into the lives of everyday users.

1. Design and Usability Assessment:

FeatureNokia G11Samsung Galaxy A04eUser Experience Impact
Interface DesignStock Android 11 (Clean, minimal bloatware)One UI Core 4.1 (Samsung's customized skin)Nokia offers a potentially smoother, more intuitive experience due to less pre-loaded software. Samsung offers customization.
Interaction Flow90Hz refresh rate (smoother scrolling)Standard 60Hz refresh rateNokia provides a noticeably smoother visual experience, especially when navigating through apps and web pages.
AccessibilityFingerprint sensor (side-mounted)No fingerprint sensorNokia offers enhanced security and convenience with biometric unlock.
Design ErgonomicsSimilar dimensions, slightly heavier (189g)Slightly lighter (188g)Negligible difference in hand feel for most users.

2. Narrative-Driven Feature Exploration:

Scenario: Imagine a busy parent juggling work emails, kids' school schedules, and online shopping.

  • Nokia G11: The clean Android interface allows for quick navigation between tasks without getting bogged down by unnecessary apps. The 90Hz refresh rate makes scrolling through lengthy emails or social media feeds a noticeably smoother experience. A quick tap of the side-mounted fingerprint sensor unlocks the phone securely.

  • Samsung Galaxy A04e: The One UI Core offers customization options, allowing the user to personalize their home screen and app layout. However, navigating through tasks might feel slightly less fluid compared to the G11's higher refresh rate. The lack of a fingerprint sensor relies on less secure unlock methods.

3. Inclusive Technology Evaluation:

  • For a tech-savvy user: The Nokia G11's clean Android experience and smoother refresh rate might be appreciated.
  • For a less tech-savvy user: Both phones offer large displays and simple interfaces. The Samsung's One UI might feel familiar if they've used Samsung devices before. The absence of a fingerprint sensor on the A04e might be a security concern for some.
  • For a budget-conscious user: Both phones fall in the low price range, making them accessible options. The slightly lower price of the A04e (depending on the region) could be the deciding factor.

4. Design-Centric Decision Framework:

While raw specifications are important, the overall user experience should be prioritized. In this comparison, the Nokia G11 edges out the Samsung Galaxy A04e due to its smoother 90Hz display and the added security and convenience of a fingerprint sensor. These seemingly small design choices significantly impact daily interactions, making the Nokia G11 a more user-friendly and enjoyable device.

My Choice: I would choose the Nokia G11. While the Samsung Galaxy A04e is a viable budget option, the Nokia G11 offers a more refined user experience. The 90Hz display makes a noticeable difference in daily use, providing a smoother and more responsive feel. The inclusion of a fingerprint sensor adds a crucial layer of security and convenience. For me, these design elements prioritize user well-being and create a more enjoyable and efficient mobile experience. The slightly higher price (if applicable) is a worthwhile investment for the noticeable improvement in usability.

Sophia Rodriguez
Sophia Rodriguez

Technology Communications Specialist

Expert in transforming complex technological innovations into accessible, engaging narratives.

Key Strengths:

  • Technology storytelling
  • User experience design analysis
  • Inclusive technology communication
  • Design-driven technology insights

Bridging technical complexity with human-centered understanding.