Nokia G100 vs Motorola Moto G53 - Detailed Phone Comparison

Detailed Comparison

Specification
Nokia G100
Nokia G100
Nokia

General

Launch Date October 1, 2022 December 15, 2022
Release Year 2022 2022

Physical

Volume 113.73 cm³ 99.66 cm³
Screen Size to Weight Ratio 3.34 "/g 3.55 "/g
Weight 195.1 g 183 g
Height 166.6 mm 162.7 mm
Width 76.7 mm 74.7 mm
Thickness 8.9 mm 8.2 mm
Foldable Design No No
Available Colors
  • Nordic Blue
  • Ink Blue
  • Arctic Silver
  • Pale Pink

Display

Screen Size 6.52 " 6.5 "
Resolution 720 x 1600 720 x 1600
Aspect Ratio 20:9 20:9
Screen-to-Body Ratio 80.3 % 83.9 %
Pixel Density 269 PPI 270 PPI
Refresh Rate N/A 120 Hz
Typical Brightness N/A N/A
HBM Brightness N/A N/A
Peak Brightness N/A N/A

Hardware

Battery Capacity per Screen Area 117.62 mAh/in² 118.34 mAh/in²
Battery Density 43.97 mAh/cm³ 50.17 mAh/cm³
Battery Capacity 5000 mAh 5000 mAh
NFC Support No Yes
Chipset Qualcomm SM6115 Snapdragon 662 (11 nm) Qualcomm SM4350-AC Snapdragon 480+ 5G (8 nm)
CPU Octa-core (4x2.0 GHz Kryo 260 Gold & 4x1.8 GHz Kryo 260 Silver) Octa-core (2x2.2 GHz Kryo 460 & 6x1.8 GHz Kryo 460)
GPU Adreno 610 Adreno 619

Connectivity

USB Version 2.0 2.0
OTG Support 1 1
DisplayPort
DisplayPort Version N/A N/A
USB Features USB Type-C 2.0, OTG USB Type-C 2.0, OTG

Software

Operating System Android Android
Initial OS Version 12 13
Maximum OS Version

Comparison Summary

Nokia G100 vs. Motorola Moto G53: A Practical Comparison

Let's dive into a head-to-head comparison of the Nokia G100 and the Motorola Moto G53, dissecting their specs and uncovering what they truly offer in terms of real-world performance.

1. Specifications Breakdown

FeatureNokia G100Motorola Moto G53Real-World Implications
Design
Dimensions (mm)166.6 x 76.7 x 8.9162.7 x 74.7 x 8.2Moto G53 is slightly smaller and thinner, potentially more pocketable.
Weight (g)195.1183G100 feels more substantial, potentially more durable but less comfortable for extended use.
Display
Size (inches)6.526.5Virtually identical screen real estate.
Resolution720 x 1600720 x 1600Same resolution, but sharpness might vary slightly due to size difference. Expect decent clarity, but not as sharp as higher-resolution displays.
Refresh Rate (Hz)Unspecified (likely 60)120Moto G53's 120Hz offers smoother scrolling and animations, a noticeable advantage for responsiveness and gaming.
Display TypeIPS LCDIPS LCDBoth offer good color reproduction and viewing angles, typical of IPS LCD technology.
Performance
ChipsetSnapdragon 662Snapdragon 480+ 5GWhile the 662 might have slightly better single-core performance, the 480+ 5G offers 5G connectivity, a more modern GPU (Adreno 619 vs. 610), and better power efficiency due to the 8nm manufacturing process.
CPUOcta-core (4x2.0 GHz & 4x1.8 GHz)Octa-core (2x2.2 GHz & 6x1.8 GHz)Both are capable for everyday tasks, but the 480+ 5G might edge out in sustained performance thanks to its more efficient architecture.
RAM3GB/4GB4GB/6GB/8GBMoto G53 offers more RAM options, beneficial for multitasking and demanding applications.
OSAndroid 12Android 13Moto G53 comes with a newer Android version, offering potential features and security updates.
Camera
Main Camera13MP50MPMoto G53 boasts significantly higher resolution, potentially capturing more detail. However, megapixels aren't everything; image quality depends on sensor size and processing.
Front Camera8MP8MPSimilar front camera resolution.
Battery Life
Capacity5000 mAh5000 mAhSimilar battery capacity, but actual battery life depends on usage and optimization. Moto G53's more efficient processor might give it an edge.

2. Key Insights

  • Performance: While the Nokia G100 might offer slightly better single-core performance for quick tasks, the Moto G53's Snapdragon 480+ 5G, coupled with more RAM options, delivers superior overall performance, better gaming capabilities, and improved power efficiency. The inclusion of 5G connectivity is a significant advantage for future-proofing.

  • Display: The Moto G53's 120Hz refresh rate is a clear winner, providing a noticeably smoother and more responsive user experience compared to the G100's standard 60Hz (assumed).

  • Camera: The Moto G53's 50MP main camera promises higher resolution and potentially more detailed photos. However, real-world image quality needs further examination.

  • Software: The Moto G53 ships with Android 13, ensuring a more up-to-date software experience with potential access to newer features and longer-term security updates. The Nokia G100 on Android 12 feels dated.

3. User Profiles and Recommendations

  • Nokia G100: Best suited for budget-conscious users who prioritize basic communication and simple tasks. Its larger form factor might appeal to those who prefer a substantial feel.

  • Motorola Moto G53: Ideal for users seeking a more well-rounded experience with smooth performance, 5G connectivity, a modern OS, and a potentially superior camera. Its better suited for light gaming, media consumption, and multitasking.

4. Buying Decision Framework

  1. Is 5G connectivity essential for you? If yes, the Moto G53 is the only option.
  2. How important is a smooth and responsive display? The Moto G53's 120Hz refresh rate significantly enhances daily use.
  3. What's your budget? While both are mid-range, the Moto G53 may come at a slightly higher price but offers better value overall.

My Choice: I would choose the Motorola Moto G53. The 5G connectivity, 120Hz refresh rate, more powerful and efficient processor (Snapdragon 480+ 5G), coupled with the newer Android OS (Android 13) makes it a significantly better device for long-term use. While the Nokia G100 offers a lower price point, the Moto G53's advantages in performance, display, and future-proofing outweigh the cost difference for me. It's a more compelling overall package.

Alex Griffin
Alex Griffin

Technology analyst specializing in mobile devices and consumer electronics.

Core Expertise

  • Mobile technology analysis
  • Consumer electronics evaluation
  • Technical specification interpretation
  • User experience insights

Professional Mission Empowering readers to make informed technology decisions by transforming intricate specifications into understandable, practical guidance.

Demystifying technology, one device at a time.