Nokia G100 vs Google Pixel 8a - Detailed Phone Comparison

Detailed Comparison

Specification
Nokia G100
Nokia G100
Nokia

General

Launch Date October 1, 2022 May 14, 2024
Release Year 2022 2024

Physical

Volume 113.73 cm³ 98.41 cm³
Screen Size to Weight Ratio 3.34 "/g 3.24 "/g
Weight 195.1 g 188 g
Height 166.6 mm 152.1 mm
Width 76.7 mm 72.7 mm
Thickness 8.9 mm 8.9 mm
Foldable Design No No
Available Colors
  • Nordic Blue
  • Obsidian
  • Porcelain
  • Bay
  • Aloe

Display

Screen Size 6.52 " 6.1 "
Resolution 720 x 1600 1080 x 2400
Aspect Ratio 20:9 20:9
Screen-to-Body Ratio 80.3 % 81.2 %
Pixel Density 269 PPI 430 PPI
Refresh Rate N/A 120 Hz
Typical Brightness N/A N/A
HBM Brightness N/A N/A
Peak Brightness N/A 2000 nits

Hardware

Battery Capacity per Screen Area 117.62 mAh/in² 120.72 mAh/in²
Battery Density 43.97 mAh/cm³ 45.64 mAh/cm³
Battery Capacity 5000 mAh 4492 mAh
NFC Support No Yes
Chipset Qualcomm SM6115 Snapdragon 662 (11 nm) Google Tensor G3 (4 nm)
CPU Octa-core (4x2.0 GHz Kryo 260 Gold & 4x1.8 GHz Kryo 260 Silver) Nona-core (1x3.0 GHz Cortex-X3 & 4x2.45 GHz Cortex-A715 & 4x2.15 GHz Cortex-A510)
GPU Adreno 610 Immortalis-G715s MC10

Connectivity

USB Version 2.0 3.2
OTG Support 1
DisplayPort
DisplayPort Version N/A N/A
USB Features USB Type-C 2.0, OTG USB Type-C 3.2

Software

Operating System Android Android
Initial OS Version 12 14
Maximum OS Version 21

Comparison Summary

Let's dive into a comparative analysis of the Nokia G100 and the Google Pixel 8a, dissecting their specifications and uncovering what they truly offer in the real world.

1. Specifications Breakdown

FeatureNokia G100Google Pixel 8aReal-World Implications
Design
Dimensions (mm)166.6 x 76.7 x 8.9152.1 x 72.7 x 8.9Pixel 8a is noticeably more compact and potentially easier to handle.
Weight (g)195.1188G100 feels slightly heavier in hand.
Build MaterialsPlasticAluminum frame, Glass backPixel 8a offers a more premium feel and potentially better durability.
Display
Display TypeIPS LCDOLEDPixel 8a delivers deeper blacks, more vibrant colors, and better power efficiency.
Size (inches)6.526.1G100 offers a larger screen for media consumption, but Pixel 8a is more pocketable.
Resolution720 x 16001080 x 2400Pixel 8a boasts significantly sharper visuals and text clarity.
Refresh Rate (Hz)-120Pixel 8a's smoother animations and scrolling enhance user experience.
Performance
ChipsetSnapdragon 662Google Tensor G3Pixel 8a provides significantly faster processing power, smoother multitasking, and better gaming performance.
CPUOcta-core (4x2.0 GHz & 4x1.8 GHz)Nona-core (up to 3.0 GHz)Pixel 8a handles demanding tasks with greater ease.
RAM (GB)48Pixel 8a enables smoother multitasking and app switching.
Storage (GB)128256Pixel 8a offers ample storage for apps, photos, and videos.
Camera
Rear Camera13MP Main, 5MP Wide, 2MP Depth64MP Main, 13MP WidePixel 8a captures higher-resolution photos with superior detail and dynamic range, leveraging Google's advanced image processing.
Front Camera8MP13MPPixel 8a's selfie camera offers higher resolution and potentially better image quality.
Video Recording1080p@30fpsUp to 4K@60fpsPixel 8a allows for higher-resolution and smoother video recording.
Battery Life
Capacity (mAh)50004492While G100 has a larger battery capacity, Pixel 8a's OLED display and efficient processor may result in comparable battery life.

2. Key Insights

The Nokia G100 focuses on affordability and long battery life. Its large display caters to media consumption, but the lower resolution and IPS technology limit its visual appeal. Performance is adequate for basic tasks, but it will struggle with demanding applications or heavy multitasking.

The Google Pixel 8a, while pricier, delivers a flagship-level experience in a mid-range package. Its powerful Tensor G3 chip, vibrant OLED display, and exceptional camera system significantly outperform the G100. Google's software optimization and guaranteed updates also enhance the user experience.

3. User Profiles and Recommendations

Nokia G100: Suitable for budget-conscious users who prioritize basic communication, web browsing, and long battery life. Ideal for seniors or those seeking a simple, reliable device without demanding performance needs.

Google Pixel 8a: Ideal for users who value performance, a premium camera experience, and the latest Android features. Excellent for photography enthusiasts, mobile gamers, and those who demand smooth multitasking and a responsive user interface.

4. Buying Decision Framework

Questions to Consider:

  1. What is your budget? The G100 is significantly more affordable.
  2. What are your primary smartphone usage patterns? Basic communication vs. demanding apps, gaming, photography.
  3. How important are camera quality, display quality, and performance? The Pixel 8a significantly excels in these areas.

Scenario-Based Recommendations:

  • Limited Budget, Basic Needs: Nokia G100
  • Balanced Budget, All-Around Performance: Google Pixel 8a
  • Prioritizing Camera and Performance: Google Pixel 8a

My Choice: Google Pixel 8a

While the Nokia G100 offers excellent value for its price, the Google Pixel 8a aligns better with my preferences and usage patterns. As a tech journalist, I need a device with robust performance, a stellar camera for capturing events, and a vibrant display for reviewing content. The Pixel 8a's superior processing power, stunning OLED screen, and class-leading camera, combined with Google's software expertise and long-term update support, make it a clear winner for me. The compact form factor is also a plus. The price premium is justified by the significant leap in overall user experience.

Alex Griffin
Alex Griffin

Technology analyst specializing in mobile devices and consumer electronics.

Core Expertise

  • Mobile technology analysis
  • Consumer electronics evaluation
  • Technical specification interpretation
  • User experience insights

Professional Mission Empowering readers to make informed technology decisions by transforming intricate specifications into understandable, practical guidance.

Demystifying technology, one device at a time.