Nokia C32 vs ZTE nubia Z50S Pro - Detailed Phone Comparison

Detailed Comparison

Specification
Nokia C32
Nokia C32
Nokia

General

Launch Date February 25, 2023 July 27, 2023
Release Year 2023 2023

Physical

Volume 107.44 cm³ 103.8 cm³
Screen Size to Weight Ratio 3.26 "/g 2.98 "/g
Weight 199.4 g 228 g
Height 164.6 mm 163.9 mm
Width 75.9 mm 76.3 mm
Thickness 8.6 mm 8.3 mm
Foldable Design No No
Available Colors
  • Charcoal
  • Autumn Green
  • Beach Pink
  • Black
  • Khaki
  • Silver/White

Display

Screen Size 6.5 " 6.8 "
Resolution 720 x 1600 1260 x 2800
Aspect Ratio 20:9 20:9
Screen-to-Body Ratio 81.6 % 89.3 %
Pixel Density 270 PPI 452 PPI
Refresh Rate N/A 120 Hz
Typical Brightness N/A N/A
HBM Brightness N/A N/A
Peak Brightness N/A 1200 nits

Hardware

Battery Capacity per Screen Area 118.34 mAh/in² 110.29 mAh/in²
Battery Density 46.54 mAh/cm³ 49.13 mAh/cm³
Battery Capacity 5000 mAh 5100 mAh
NFC Support No Yes
Chipset Unisoc SC9863A1 (22 nm) Qualcomm SM8550-AC Snapdragon 8+ Gen 2 (4 nm)
CPU Octa-core (4x1.6 GHz Cortex-A55 & 4x1.2 GHz Cortex-A55) Octa-core (1x3.36 GHz Cortex-X3 & 2x2.8 GHz Cortex-A715 & 2x2.8 GHz Cortex-A710 & 3x2.0 GHz Cortex-A510)
GPU IMG8322 Adreno 740 (719 MHz)

Connectivity

USB Version 2.0 3.1
OTG Support
DisplayPort
DisplayPort Version N/A N/A
USB Features USB Type-C 2.0 USB Type-C 3.1

Software

Operating System Android Android
Initial OS Version 13 13
Maximum OS Version

Comparison Summary

1. Specifications Comparison

FeatureNokia C32ZTE nubia Z50S ProPractical Impact
Design
Dimensions (mm)164.6 x 75.9 x 8.6163.9 x 76.3 x 8.3Z50S Pro is slightly shorter and thinner. Negligible difference in daily use.
Weight (g)199.4228C32 is noticeably lighter, reducing hand fatigue during extended use.
Build MaterialUnspecifiedUnspecifiedMaterial affects durability and premium feel. Lack of information limits comparison.
Display
Display TypeIPS LCDAMOLEDZ50S Pro offers significantly better contrast, deeper blacks, and more vibrant colors.
Display Size (inches)6.56.8Z50S Pro provides a larger viewing area for media consumption.
Resolution (pixels)720 x 16001260 x 2800Z50S Pro boasts much sharper visuals due to higher resolution and pixel density.
Refresh Rate (Hz)Unspecified120Z50S Pro's 120Hz delivers smoother scrolling and animations, enhancing the user experience.
Performance
ChipsetUnisoc SC9863A1 (22 nm)Qualcomm SM8550-AC Snapdragon 8+ Gen 2 (4 nm)Z50S Pro's flagship Snapdragon processor provides significantly faster performance in demanding tasks like gaming and multitasking.
CPUOcta-core (4x1.6 GHz Cortex-A55 & 4x1.2 GHz Cortex-A55)Octa-core (1x3.36 GHz Cortex-X3 & 2x2.8 GHz Cortex-A715 & 2x2.8 GHz Cortex-A710 & 3x2.0 GHz Cortex-A510)Z50S Pro's CPU offers superior processing power and speed.
RAM (GB)412Z50S Pro's 12GB RAM enables seamless multitasking and handling of demanding applications. C32's 4GB may lead to occasional slowdowns.
Storage64GB/128GB256GB/1TBZ50S Pro offers vastly more storage for apps, photos, and videos.
Camera
Main Camera (MP)5054While megapixel count is similar, the Z50S Pro likely uses a superior sensor (Sony IMX800) for better image quality, especially in low light.
Camera FeaturesBasic featuresAdvanced features including Optical Stabilization, 8K video recordingZ50S Pro offers a more versatile and feature-rich camera experience for enthusiasts.
Battery
Capacity (mAh)50005100Negligible difference in battery capacity. Real-world battery life depends on usage and optimization.
Fast Charging10W80WZ50S Pro's significantly faster charging dramatically reduces downtime.

2. Key Differences Analysis

Nokia C32 Advantages:

  • Lighter weight: Easier to hold and carry for extended periods.
  • Lower price: Significantly more affordable.

ZTE nubia Z50S Pro Advantages:

  • Superior Performance: Flagship processor, ample RAM, and fast storage for smooth and lag-free experience.
  • High-Quality Display: Vivid AMOLED display with a higher resolution and refresh rate for immersive visuals.
  • Advanced Camera System: Versatile camera setup with optical stabilization and 8K video recording.
  • Fast Charging: Significantly faster charging speeds.

Trade-offs:

  • Price: The Z50S Pro comes at a significantly higher price point.
  • Weight: The Z50S Pro is heavier, potentially leading to hand fatigue.

3. User Profiles & Recommendations

Nokia C32: Ideal for budget-conscious users who prioritize basic communication, web browsing, and light app usage.

ZTE nubia Z50S Pro: Suitable for power users, gamers, photography enthusiasts, and those who demand top-tier performance and features.

4. Decision Framework

Key Questions for Buyers:

  1. What is your budget? The C32 is a budget phone, while the Z50S Pro is a premium device.
  2. What are your primary use cases? Basic tasks vs. demanding applications and gaming.
  3. How important are camera quality and display experience? The Z50S Pro significantly outperforms the C32 in these areas.

Scenario-Based Recommendations:

  • Limited budget, basic usage: Nokia C32
  • Prioritize performance, gaming, photography: ZTE nubia Z50S Pro

My Choice: ZTE nubia Z50S Pro

While the Nokia C32 offers great value for its price, I would choose the ZTE nubia Z50S Pro. The significantly improved performance, stunning display, advanced camera features, and fast charging outweigh the higher price and added weight for me. I prioritize a smooth and lag-free user experience, high-quality visuals, and the ability to capture great photos and videos. The Z50S Pro's superior specifications would enhance my daily usage and provide a more enjoyable overall smartphone experience. The 80W fast charging is a significant advantage in my fast-paced life. While the price is higher, the long-term value proposition of the Z50S Pro, with its powerful hardware and future-proof features, makes it a worthwhile investment for me.

Emily Harper
Emily Harper

Technology Insights Specialist

Dedicated technology writer specializing in mobile device analysis and technology communication. Expert at translating complex smartphone features into clear, actionable insights for diverse audiences.

Key Strengths:

  • Mobile technology analysis
  • Digital media communication
  • Technical storytelling
  • User-centric technology insights

Bridging technical complexity with engaging, accessible narratives.