Nokia C32 vs ZTE Blade A75 4G - Detailed Phone Comparison

Detailed Comparison

Specification
Nokia C32
Nokia C32
Nokia

General

Launch Date February 25, 2023 July 1, 2024
Release Year 2023 2024

Physical

Volume 107.44 cm³ 106.97 cm³
Screen Size to Weight Ratio 3.26 "/g 3.49 "/g
Weight 199.4 g 189 g
Height 164.6 mm 164.1 mm
Width 75.9 mm 75.8 mm
Thickness 8.6 mm 8.6 mm
Foldable Design No No
Available Colors
  • Charcoal
  • Autumn Green
  • Beach Pink
  • Basalt Black
  • Aqua Green
  • Marble White

Display

Screen Size 6.5 " 6.6 "
Resolution 720 x 1600 720 x 1612
Aspect Ratio 20:9 20:9
Screen-to-Body Ratio 81.6 % 84.1 %
Pixel Density 270 PPI 267 PPI
Refresh Rate N/A 90 Hz
Typical Brightness N/A N/A
HBM Brightness N/A N/A
Peak Brightness N/A N/A

Hardware

Battery Capacity per Screen Area 118.34 mAh/in² 114.78 mAh/in²
Battery Density 46.54 mAh/cm³ 46.74 mAh/cm³
Battery Capacity 5000 mAh 5000 mAh
NFC Support No Yes
Chipset Unisoc SC9863A1 (22 nm) Unisoc T606 (12 nm)
CPU Octa-core (4x1.6 GHz Cortex-A55 & 4x1.2 GHz Cortex-A55) Octa-core (2x1.6 GHz Cortex-A75 & 6x1.6 GHz Cortex-A55)
GPU IMG8322 Mali-G57 MP1

Connectivity

USB Version 2.0 2.0
OTG Support
DisplayPort
DisplayPort Version N/A N/A
USB Features USB Type-C 2.0 USB Type-C 2.0

Software

Operating System Android Android
Initial OS Version 13 13
Maximum OS Version

Comparison Summary

1. Specifications Comparison

FeatureNokia C32ZTE Blade A75 4GPractical Impact
Design
Dimensions (mm)164.6 x 75.9 x 8.6164.1 x 75.8 x 8.6Virtually identical in size and thickness.
Weight (g)199.4189ZTE is noticeably lighter, improving one-handed use.
Build MaterialsNot specifiedNot specifiedCannot compare build quality and durability.
Display
Display Size (inches)6.56.6ZTE offers slightly more screen real estate.
Resolution (pixels)720 x 1600720 x 1612Nearly identical resolutions; expect similar sharpness.
Display TypeIPS LCDIPS LCDBoth offer decent color accuracy but limited viewing angles.
Refresh Rate (Hz)Not specified90ZTE's 90Hz refresh rate provides smoother scrolling and animations, enhancing the user experience.
Performance
ChipsetUnisoc SC9863A1 (22nm)Unisoc T606 (12nm)ZTE's T606, built on a smaller process node, offers better performance and power efficiency.
CPUOcta-core (4x1.6 GHz Cortex-A55 & 4x1.2 GHz Cortex-A55)Octa-core (2x1.6 GHz Cortex-A75 & 6x1.6 GHz Cortex-A55)ZTE features more powerful Cortex-A75 cores for demanding tasks.
GPUIMG8322Mali-G57 MP1ZTE's GPU likely offers better gaming performance, but specific benchmarks are needed for accurate comparison.
RAM4GBUp to 8GB (Variant Dependent)ZTE offers a configuration with larger RAM enabling better multitasking.
Storage64GB/128GBUp to 256GB (Variant Dependent)ZTE offers significantly larger storage options for media and apps.
Camera
Rear Camera50MP + 2MP Macro50MP + 0.3MP (Likely Depth Sensor)Main sensors are comparable, but the secondary lens on the Nokia is more useful (Macro vs. Depth).
Front Camera8MP8MPSimilar front-facing camera resolution.
Video Recording1080p@30fps1080p@30fpsIdentical video recording capabilities.
Battery
Capacity (mAh)50005000Identical battery capacities.
Fast Charging10W22.5WZTE supports significantly faster charging, minimizing downtime.
OtherNFC: NoNFC: YesZTE supports NFC for contactless payments and other functionalities.

2. Key Differences Analysis

ZTE Blade A75 4G Advantages:

  • Performance: The more efficient chipset, more powerful CPU cores, higher RAM option, and larger storage options offer a smoother and faster user experience for demanding tasks, multitasking, and gaming.
  • Display: The 90Hz refresh rate provides a significant visual improvement in fluidity.
  • Charging: 22.5W fast charging significantly reduces charging time.
  • Connectivity: NFC enables contactless payments and data transfer.

Nokia C32 Advantages:

  • Potentially Lower Price: While price isn't directly comparable here, Nokia phones in this range often position themselves competitively.
  • Slightly Better Secondary Camera: The 2MP macro lens offers more practical utility than a basic depth sensor.

3. User Profiles & Recommendations

Nokia C32: Budget-conscious users who prioritize basic communication, web browsing, and light media consumption. Suitable for users who are not heavy gamers or multitaskers.

ZTE Blade A75 4G: Users who value performance, smoother display, faster charging, and NFC functionality. Suited for moderate gaming, multitasking, and mobile photography enthusiasts.

4. Decision Framework

Key Questions for Buyers:

  1. What is your budget? The Nokia C32 is likely more affordable.
  2. What is your primary usage? For basic tasks, the Nokia C32 suffices. For demanding tasks and gaming, the ZTE Blade A75 4G is better.
  3. Which features are essential? Consider the importance of NFC, faster charging, and a higher refresh rate display.

My Choice: ZTE Blade A75 4G

While precise pricing isn't available for comparison, the ZTE Blade A75 4G offers significant advantages in performance, display, and charging speed for a likely marginal price difference. The inclusion of NFC enhances its versatility. Even if the 8GB/256GB variant commands a premium, the 4GB/256GB model still presents superior value compared to the Nokia C32. The smoother 90Hz display, faster processor, and quicker charging outweigh the Nokia's marginally better secondary camera. The ZTE's more modern chipset will likely also result in better long-term software support.

Emily Harper
Emily Harper

Technology Insights Specialist

Dedicated technology writer specializing in mobile device analysis and technology communication. Expert at translating complex smartphone features into clear, actionable insights for diverse audiences.

Key Strengths:

  • Mobile technology analysis
  • Digital media communication
  • Technical storytelling
  • User-centric technology insights

Bridging technical complexity with engaging, accessible narratives.