Nokia C32 vs Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 4G - Detailed Phone Comparison

Detailed Comparison

Specification
Nokia C32
Nokia C32
Nokia

General

Launch Date February 25, 2023 March 30, 2023
Release Year 2023 2023

Physical

Volume 107.44 cm³ 99.49 cm³
Screen Size to Weight Ratio 3.26 "/g 3.63 "/g
Weight 199.4 g 183.5 g
Height 164.6 mm 165.7 mm
Width 75.9 mm 76 mm
Thickness 8.6 mm 7.9 mm
Foldable Design No No
Available Colors
  • Charcoal
  • Autumn Green
  • Beach Pink
  • Ice Blue
  • Mint Green
  • Onyx Gray

Display

Screen Size 6.5 " 6.67 "
Resolution 720 x 1600 1080 x 2400
Aspect Ratio 20:9 20:9
Screen-to-Body Ratio 81.6 % 85.3 %
Pixel Density 270 PPI 395 PPI
Refresh Rate N/A 120 Hz
Typical Brightness N/A 450 nits
HBM Brightness N/A 700 nits
Peak Brightness N/A 1200 nits

Hardware

Battery Capacity per Screen Area 118.34 mAh/in² 112.39 mAh/in²
Battery Density 46.54 mAh/cm³ 50.26 mAh/cm³
Battery Capacity 5000 mAh 5000 mAh
NFC Support No Yes
Chipset Unisoc SC9863A1 (22 nm) Qualcomm SM6225 Snapdragon 685 (6 nm)
CPU Octa-core (4x1.6 GHz Cortex-A55 & 4x1.2 GHz Cortex-A55) Octa-core (4x2.8 GHz Cortex-A73 & 4x1.9 GHz Cortex-A53)
GPU IMG8322 Adreno 610

Connectivity

USB Version 2.0 2.0
OTG Support 1
DisplayPort
DisplayPort Version N/A N/A
USB Features USB Type-C 2.0 USB Type-C 2.0, OTG

Software

Operating System Android Android
Initial OS Version 13 13
Maximum OS Version 14

Comparison Summary

1. Specifications Comparison

FeatureNokia C32Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 4GPractical Impact
Design
Dimensions (mm)164.6 x 75.9 x 8.6165.7 x 76 x 7.9Redmi Note 12 4G is slightly larger but thinner. Negligible difference in everyday use.
Weight (g)199.4183.5Redmi Note 12 4G is noticeably lighter, improving one-handed use.
BuildUnspecifiedUnspecifiedMaterial differences could impact durability and premium feel, but information is lacking.
Display
Display TypeIPS LCDAMOLEDRedmi Note 12 4G offers richer colors, deeper blacks, and better power efficiency due to AMOLED technology.
Size (inches)6.56.67Redmi Note 12 4G has a slightly larger screen for more immersive content consumption.
Resolution720 x 16001080 x 2400Redmi Note 12 4G has a significantly sharper display, resulting in clearer text and images.
Refresh RateUnspecified120HzRedmi Note 12 4G's 120Hz refresh rate delivers smoother scrolling and animations, enhancing the overall user experience.
Performance
ChipsetUnisoc SC9863A1 (22nm)Qualcomm Snapdragon 685 (6nm)Redmi Note 12 4G boasts a significantly more powerful and efficient processor, enabling smoother multitasking and better gaming performance.
CPUOcta-core (4x1.6 GHz Cortex-A55 & 4x1.2 GHz Cortex-A55)Octa-core (4x2.8 GHz Cortex-A73 & 4x1.9 GHz Cortex-A53)Redmi Note 12 4G's CPU has faster and more powerful cores, leading to a noticeable performance advantage in demanding tasks.
GPUIMG8322Adreno 610Redmi Note 12 4G offers superior graphics performance for smoother gaming and media playback.
RAM4GB4/6/8GBRedmi Note 12 4G offers configurations with more RAM, improving multitasking capabilities.
Camera
Rear Camera50MP + 2MP48MP + 8MP + 2MPRedmi Note 12 4G features a triple camera setup with an ultrawide lens, offering greater versatility. Sensor quality details are crucial for image quality comparison but are incomplete.
Front Camera8MP13MPRedmi Note 12 4G likely produces better selfie photos with a higher resolution front camera.
Battery
Capacity5000 mAh5000 mAhSimilar battery capacities suggest comparable battery life, but real-world usage may vary due to display and processor efficiency differences.
Charging10W33WRedmi Note 12 4G supports significantly faster charging, reducing downtime.

2. Key Differences Analysis

Nokia C32 Advantages:

  • Potentially Lower Price: Belonging to the "low price" range, it likely offers a more budget-friendly option.

Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 4G Advantages:

  • Superior Performance: Significantly faster processor, better GPU, and higher RAM options enable smoother multitasking, gaming, and overall responsiveness.
  • Better Display: AMOLED technology, higher resolution, and 120Hz refresh rate provide a vastly improved visual experience.
  • Faster Charging: 33W fast charging drastically reduces charging time compared to the C32's 10W.
  • More Versatile Camera: The inclusion of an ultrawide lens offers more creative photography options.
  • NFC: Enables contactless payments and other convenient features.

3. User Profiles & Recommendations

Nokia C32: Suitable for users on a tight budget who prioritize basic communication and light usage. Ideal for:

  • Calling and texting
  • Basic web browsing
  • Casual social media use

Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 4G: Suitable for users seeking a well-rounded smartphone with good performance, display, and camera capabilities. Ideal for:

  • Gaming
  • Media consumption (videos, photos)
  • Multitasking
  • Mobile photography

4. Decision Framework

Key Questions for Buyers:

  1. What is your budget? The C32 is likely significantly cheaper.
  2. What are your primary smartphone usage patterns? For basic use, the C32 might suffice. For demanding tasks, the Redmi Note 12 is better equipped.
  3. Which features are most important to you? Prioritize performance, display, and camera? The Redmi Note 12 4G excels in these areas. Prioritize affordability above all else? The C32 might be a better fit.

My Choice: Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 4G

While the Nokia C32 offers a budget-friendly option, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 4G provides a significantly better overall user experience. The superior performance, AMOLED display with 120Hz refresh rate, faster charging, more versatile camera, and NFC functionality justify the price difference for most users. The improved user experience in daily tasks, media consumption, and even light gaming outweighs the potential cost savings of the C32. Unless budget is an extreme constraint, the Redmi Note 12 4G is the clear winner.

Emily Harper
Emily Harper

Technology Insights Specialist

Dedicated technology writer specializing in mobile device analysis and technology communication. Expert at translating complex smartphone features into clear, actionable insights for diverse audiences.

Key Strengths:

  • Mobile technology analysis
  • Digital media communication
  • Technical storytelling
  • User-centric technology insights

Bridging technical complexity with engaging, accessible narratives.