Nokia C32 vs Xiaomi Poco F5 - Detailed Phone Comparison

Detailed Comparison

Specification
Nokia C32
Nokia C32
Nokia

General

Launch Date February 25, 2023 May 1, 2023
Release Year 2023 2023

Physical

Volume 107.44 cm³ 95.45 cm³
Screen Size to Weight Ratio 3.26 "/g 3.69 "/g
Weight 199.4 g 181 g
Height 164.6 mm 161.1 mm
Width 75.9 mm 75 mm
Thickness 8.6 mm 7.9 mm
Foldable Design No No
Available Colors
  • Charcoal
  • Autumn Green
  • Beach Pink
  • Black
  • Blue
  • White

Display

Screen Size 6.5 " 6.67 "
Resolution 720 x 1600 1080 x 2400
Aspect Ratio 20:9 20:9
Screen-to-Body Ratio 81.6 % 88.9 %
Pixel Density 270 PPI 395 PPI
Refresh Rate N/A 120 Hz
Typical Brightness N/A 500 nits
HBM Brightness N/A N/A
Peak Brightness N/A 1000 nits

Hardware

Battery Capacity per Screen Area 118.34 mAh/in² 112.39 mAh/in²
Battery Density 46.54 mAh/cm³ 52.38 mAh/cm³
Battery Capacity 5000 mAh 5000 mAh
NFC Support No Yes
Chipset Unisoc SC9863A1 (22 nm) Qualcomm SM7475-AB Snapdragon 7+ Gen 2 (4 nm)
CPU Octa-core (4x1.6 GHz Cortex-A55 & 4x1.2 GHz Cortex-A55) Octa-core (1x2.91 GHz Cortex-X2 & 3x2.49 GHz Cortex-A710 & 4x1.8 GHz Cortex-A510)
GPU IMG8322 Adreno 725

Connectivity

USB Version 2.0 2.0
OTG Support 1
DisplayPort
DisplayPort Version N/A N/A
USB Features USB Type-C 2.0 USB Type-C 2.0, OTG

Software

Operating System Android Android
Initial OS Version 13 13
Maximum OS Version 14

Comparison Summary

1. Specifications Comparison

FeatureNokia C32Xiaomi Poco F5Practical Impact
Design
Dimensions (mm)164.6 x 75.9 x 8.6161.1 x 75 x 7.9Poco F5 is slightly smaller and thinner.
Weight (g)199.4181Poco F5 is noticeably lighter, improving one-handed use.
BuildUnspecifiedUnspecifiedBuild quality and materials cannot be compared without further information.
Display
Display TypeIPS LCDAMOLEDPoco F5 offers significantly better contrast, colors, and viewing angles with its AMOLED display.
Display Size (inches)6.56.67Negligible difference in screen real estate.
Resolution720 x 16001080 x 2400Poco F5 has a much sharper display, resulting in clearer text and images.
Refresh RateUnspecified120HzPoco F5's 120Hz refresh rate delivers smoother animations and scrolling. C32's refresh rate is unknown.
Performance
ChipsetUnisoc SC9863A1 (22nm)Qualcomm Snapdragon 7+ Gen 2 (4nm)Poco F5 boasts significantly faster processing power for demanding tasks and gaming.
CPUOcta-core (4x1.6 GHz Cortex-A55 & 4x1.2 GHz Cortex-A55)Octa-core (1x2.91 GHz Cortex-X2 & 3x2.49 GHz Cortex-A710 & 4x1.8 GHz Cortex-A510)Poco F5's CPU architecture is far superior, leading to much better performance.
GPUIMG8322Adreno 725Poco F5 provides dramatically better graphics performance for gaming and visually intensive applications.
RAM4GB8GB/12GBPoco F5 offers more RAM, enabling better multitasking and smoother performance with multiple apps open.
Camera
Main Camera50MP64MPWhile megapixels aren't everything, the Poco F5 likely captures more detail. Its larger sensor and wider aperture (f/1.79 vs. unspecified for C32) suggest better low-light performance.
Video Recording1080p@30fps4K@30fpsPoco F5 allows for higher resolution video recording.
Battery
Capacity5000mAh5000mAhSimilar battery capacity on both phones.
Fast Charging10W67WPoco F5 charges significantly faster, minimizing downtime.

2. Key Differences Analysis

Nokia C32 Advantages:

  • Lower Price: The C32 is significantly more affordable.

Xiaomi Poco F5 Advantages:

  • Superior Performance: Significantly faster processor, GPU, and more RAM.
  • Better Display: Higher resolution, AMOLED technology, 120Hz refresh rate.
  • Faster Charging: 67W fast charging compared to 10W on the C32.
  • More Features: NFC, 5G connectivity, better camera capabilities.

Trade-offs:

  • Price: The Poco F5's advanced features come at a higher price.

3. User Profiles & Recommendations

Nokia C32: Ideal for budget-conscious users who prioritize basic communication (calls, texts, browsing) and light app usage. Not recommended for demanding tasks, gaming, or media consumption.

Xiaomi Poco F5: Suitable for users who demand high performance, a great display, fast charging, and excellent camera capabilities. Ideal for gaming, media consumption, multitasking, and photography enthusiasts.

4. Decision Framework

Key Questions for Buyers:

  1. What is your budget?
  2. What are your primary smartphone usage patterns?
  3. Which features are most important to you (performance, display, camera, battery life)?

Scenario-Based Recommendations:

  • Limited Budget, Basic Usage: Nokia C32
  • Moderate Budget, Balanced Needs: Consider other mid-range options; the C32 lacks key features, and the Poco F5 might be overkill.
  • Performance and Feature Focused: Xiaomi Poco F5

My Choice: Xiaomi Poco F5

While the Nokia C32 offers an enticing price point, the Poco F5 provides a significantly superior user experience in almost every aspect. The performance difference is substantial, and the AMOLED display, fast charging, and better camera system make it a much more versatile and future-proof device. The price difference is justifiable for the significant leap in quality and features. For my needs, the smoother performance, superior display, and faster charging of the Poco F5 are worth the extra cost. The C32 feels like a compromise in too many areas crucial for a satisfying smartphone experience in 2023 and beyond.

Emily Harper
Emily Harper

Technology Insights Specialist

Dedicated technology writer specializing in mobile device analysis and technology communication. Expert at translating complex smartphone features into clear, actionable insights for diverse audiences.

Key Strengths:

  • Mobile technology analysis
  • Digital media communication
  • Technical storytelling
  • User-centric technology insights

Bridging technical complexity with engaging, accessible narratives.