Nokia C32 vs vivo X100 - Detailed Phone Comparison

Detailed Comparison

Specification
Nokia C32
Nokia C32
Nokia
vivo X100
vivo X100
Vivo

General

Launch Date February 25, 2023 November 21, 2023
Release Year 2023 2023

Physical

Volume 107.44 cm³ 104.89 cm³
Screen Size to Weight Ratio 3.26 "/g 3.36 "/g
Weight 199.4 g 202 g
Height 164.6 mm 164.1 mm
Width 75.9 mm 75.2 mm
Thickness 8.6 mm 8.5 mm
Foldable Design No No
Available Colors
  • Charcoal
  • Autumn Green
  • Beach Pink
  • White
  • Orange
  • Startrail Blue
  • Asteroid Black

Display

Screen Size 6.5 " 6.78 "
Resolution 720 x 1600 1260 x 2800
Aspect Ratio 20:9 20:9
Screen-to-Body Ratio 81.6 % 89.9 %
Pixel Density 270 PPI 452 PPI
Refresh Rate N/A 120 Hz
Typical Brightness N/A N/A
HBM Brightness N/A N/A
Peak Brightness N/A 3000 nits

Hardware

Battery Capacity per Screen Area 118.34 mAh/in² 108.77 mAh/in²
Battery Density 46.54 mAh/cm³ 47.67 mAh/cm³
Battery Capacity 5000 mAh 5000 mAh
NFC Support No Yes
Chipset Unisoc SC9863A1 (22 nm) Mediatek Dimensity 9300 (4 nm)
CPU Octa-core (4x1.6 GHz Cortex-A55 & 4x1.2 GHz Cortex-A55) Octa-core (1x3.25 GHz Cortex-X4 & 3x2.85 GHz Cortex-X4 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A720)
GPU IMG8322 Immortalis-G720 MC12

Connectivity

USB Version 2.0 2.0
OTG Support 1
DisplayPort
DisplayPort Version N/A N/A
USB Features USB Type-C 2.0 USB Type-C 2.0, OTG

Software

Operating System Android Android
Initial OS Version 13 14
Maximum OS Version

Comparison Summary

1. Specifications Comparison

FeatureNokia C32vivo X100Practical Impact
Design
Dimensions (mm)164.6 x 75.9 x 8.6164.1 x 75.2 x 8.5Nearly identical dimensions; negligible real-world difference in size.
Weight (g)199.4202Negligible weight difference; both feel similarly substantial in hand.
Build MaterialsNot specifiedNot specifiedCannot compare build quality and durability without material information.
Display
Display TypeIPS LCDLTPO AMOLEDVivo X100 offers significantly better contrast, deeper blacks, and potentially higher brightness with AMOLED. LTPO allows for dynamic refresh rate adjustment, saving battery.
Display Size (inches)6.56.78X100 has a noticeably larger screen, better for media consumption.
Resolution720 x 16001260 x 2800X100 boasts much sharper visuals due to significantly higher resolution.
Refresh Rate (Hz)Not specified120X100's 120Hz refresh rate provides a smoother, more responsive user experience.
Performance
ChipsetUnisoc SC9863A1 (22 nm)Mediatek Dimensity 9300 (4 nm)X100's Dimensity 9300 offers vastly superior performance and efficiency due to its advanced 4nm architecture.
CPUOcta-core (4x1.6 GHz Cortex-A55 & 4x1.2 GHz Cortex-A55)Octa-core (1x3.25 GHz Cortex-X4 & 3x2.85 GHz Cortex-X4 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A720)X100's CPU features much more powerful cores, resulting in significantly faster app loading, multitasking, and overall responsiveness.
RAM4GB12/16GBX100 offers substantially more RAM, enabling smoother multitasking and preventing apps from closing in the background.
Camera
Rear Camera50MP + 2MP50MP (Sony IMX920) + 50MP + 64MP (Telephoto)X100 provides a more versatile camera system with a dedicated telephoto lens and superior main sensor for potentially better image quality.
Front Camera8MP32MPX100's higher resolution front camera will produce significantly better selfies.
Camera FeaturesBasicAdvanced (OIS, Zeiss Lens, 4K Video, etc.)X100 offers advanced features like optical image stabilization, Zeiss optics, and 4K video recording for superior photo and video quality.
Battery
Capacity (mAh)50005000Similar battery capacity.
Fast Charging10W120WX100 charges dramatically faster with 120W fast charging.

2. Key Differences Analysis

Nokia C32 Advantages:

  • Lower Price: Significantly more affordable.

vivo X100 Advantages:

  • Superior Performance: Significantly faster and more responsive due to a powerful chipset and ample RAM.
  • High-Quality Display: AMOLED screen offers vibrant colors, deep blacks, and a smoother 120Hz refresh rate.
  • Versatile Camera System: Includes a telephoto lens, advanced features, and potentially better image quality thanks to superior sensor hardware.
  • Extremely Fast Charging: 120W fast charging allows for incredibly quick top-ups.

3. User Profiles & Recommendations

Nokia C32:

  • Ideal User: Budget-conscious users who prioritize basic communication and light app usage.
  • Use Cases: Calling, texting, browsing, social media, casual photography.

vivo X100:

  • Ideal User: Users who demand high performance, a premium display, a versatile camera, and fast charging. Power users, mobile gamers, photography enthusiasts.
  • Use Cases: Demanding applications, mobile gaming, high-quality photography and videography, content creation.

4. Decision Framework

Key Questions:

  1. What is your budget? The C32 is significantly cheaper.
  2. What are your primary smartphone usage patterns? For basic tasks, the C32 suffices. For demanding tasks, the X100 is necessary.
  3. Which features are most important to you? Prioritize performance, display, camera, and charging speed if choosing the X100. Prioritize affordability if choosing the C32.

My Choice: vivo X100

While the Nokia C32 offers excellent value for its price, the vivo X100 is the superior device in almost every aspect. Its powerful performance, stunning display, versatile camera system, and incredibly fast charging make it a compelling choice. The price difference is significant, but the X100 offers a substantial upgrade in user experience that justifies the premium for users who value these features. The C32 serves its purpose as a budget device, but the X100 provides a future-proof and enjoyable experience for the long term. I prioritize performance, a good display, and a capable camera, making the X100 the clear winner for me.

Emily Harper
Emily Harper

Technology Insights Specialist

Dedicated technology writer specializing in mobile device analysis and technology communication. Expert at translating complex smartphone features into clear, actionable insights for diverse audiences.

Key Strengths:

  • Mobile technology analysis
  • Digital media communication
  • Technical storytelling
  • User-centric technology insights

Bridging technical complexity with engaging, accessible narratives.