Nokia C32 vs Tecno Pova 6 Pro - Detailed Phone Comparison

Detailed Comparison

Specification
Nokia C32
Nokia C32
Nokia

General

Launch Date February 25, 2023 April 4, 2024
Release Year 2023 2024

Physical

Volume 107.44 cm³ 99.5 cm³
Screen Size to Weight Ratio 3.26 "/g 3.42 "/g
Weight 199.4 g 198 g
Height 164.6 mm 165.5 mm
Width 75.9 mm 76.1 mm
Thickness 8.6 mm 7.9 mm
Foldable Design No No
Available Colors
  • Charcoal
  • Autumn Green
  • Beach Pink
  • Comet Green
  • Meteorite Grey

Display

Screen Size 6.5 " 6.78 "
Resolution 720 x 1600 1080 x 2436
Aspect Ratio 20:9 20:9
Screen-to-Body Ratio 81.6 % 87.2 %
Pixel Density 270 PPI 393 PPI
Refresh Rate N/A 120 Hz
Typical Brightness N/A N/A
HBM Brightness N/A N/A
Peak Brightness N/A 1300 nits

Hardware

Battery Capacity per Screen Area 118.34 mAh/in² 130.52 mAh/in²
Battery Density 46.54 mAh/cm³ 60.3 mAh/cm³
Battery Capacity 5000 mAh 6000 mAh
NFC Support No Yes
Chipset Unisoc SC9863A1 (22 nm) Mediatek Dimensity 6080 (6 nm)
CPU Octa-core (4x1.6 GHz Cortex-A55 & 4x1.2 GHz Cortex-A55) Octa-core (2x2.4 GHz Cortex-A76 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55)
GPU IMG8322 Mali-G57 MC2

Connectivity

USB Version 2.0 2.0
OTG Support
DisplayPort
DisplayPort Version N/A N/A
USB Features USB Type-C 2.0 USB Type-C 2.0

Software

Operating System Android Android
Initial OS Version 13 14
Maximum OS Version

Comparison Summary

1. Specifications Comparison

FeatureNokia C32Tecno Pova 6 ProPractical Impact
Design
Dimensions (mm)164.6 x 75.9 x 8.6165.5 x 76.1 x 7.9Tecno slightly larger, but both are similar in size.
Weight (g)199.4198Negligible weight difference.
Build MaterialNot specifiedNot specifiedCannot compare build quality and durability.
Display
Display TypeIPS LCDAMOLEDTecno offers significantly better contrast, colors, and viewing angles with AMOLED.
Display Size (inches)6.56.78Tecno has a larger display for more immersive content consumption.
Resolution720 x 16001080 x 2436Tecno boasts much sharper visuals due to higher resolution.
Refresh RateNot specified120HzTecno's 120Hz provides smoother scrolling and animations. Nokia's refresh rate is unknown, limiting comparison.
Peak BrightnessNot specified1300 nitsTecno's display will be much more visible in bright sunlight. Nokia's peak brightness is unknown, hindering full comparison.
Performance
ChipsetUnisoc SC9863A1 (22nm)Mediatek Dimensity 6080 (6nm)Tecno's 6nm chipset will offer significantly better performance and power efficiency.
CPUOcta-core (4x1.6 GHz Cortex-A55 & 4x1.2 GHz Cortex-A55)Octa-core (2x2.4 GHz Cortex-A76 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55)Tecno features more powerful cores resulting in notably faster performance for demanding tasks and multitasking.
GPUIMG8322Mali-G57 MC2Tecno's GPU is more capable for gaming and graphically intensive applications.
RAM4GB12GB (Variant dependent - 6GB available)Tecno offers significantly more RAM, enabling smoother multitasking and better performance with demanding apps.
Storage64GB/128GB256GB (Variant dependent)Tecno offers much larger storage capacity.
Camera
Main Camera50MP108MPTecno's higher resolution main camera potentially offers more detail, but image quality depends on sensor and processing, which are not fully detailed.
Front Camera8MP32MPTecno's front camera likely produces significantly better selfies.
Video Recording1080p@30fps1440p@30fps, 1080p@60fpsTecno offers higher resolution and frame rate video recording.
Battery
Capacity5000mAh6000mAhTecno offers longer battery life.
Fast Charging10W70WTecno charges significantly faster.

2. Key Differences Analysis

Tecno Pova 6 Pro Advantages:

  • Significantly superior performance: The Dimensity 6080 chipset, coupled with more RAM, provides a much smoother and faster user experience.
  • Better display: AMOLED technology, higher resolution, 120Hz refresh rate, and higher peak brightness result in a vastly improved visual experience.
  • Faster charging: 70W fast charging allows for incredibly quick top-ups.
  • Larger battery: Offers longer usage time between charges.
  • More versatile camera: Higher resolution sensors and video recording capabilities.
  • 5G Connectivity: Future-proofs the device.
  • NFC: Enables contactless payments and other convenient features.

Nokia C32 Advantages:

  • Lower price: Significantly more affordable.

3. User Profiles & Recommendations

Nokia C32: Best suited for budget-conscious users who prioritize basic communication and light usage. Ideal for calling, texting, browsing, and social media. Not recommended for gaming or demanding applications.

Tecno Pova 6 Pro: Suitable for users who demand performance, a great display, and long battery life. Ideal for gamers, content creators, and power users.

4. Decision Framework

Key Questions for Buyers:

  1. What is your budget? The Nokia C32 is a budget option, while the Tecno Pova 6 Pro is a mid-range device.
  2. What are your primary use cases? Basic communication vs. demanding apps and gaming.
  3. How important is display quality and performance? The Tecno Pova 6 Pro significantly outperforms the Nokia C32 in these areas.

Scenario-Based Recommendations:

  • Limited budget, basic usage: Nokia C32
  • Balanced budget, moderate usage: Consider other options, as the price jump to the Tecno might be significant.
  • Performance and features are paramount: Tecno Pova 6 Pro

My Choice: Tecno Pova 6 Pro

While significantly more expensive, the Tecno Pova 6 Pro offers a vastly superior user experience in almost every aspect. The performance difference alone would be a major factor for me. The AMOLED display, faster charging, larger battery, and better camera system further solidify its position as the better choice. While the Nokia C32 serves its purpose as a budget device, the Tecno Pova 6 Pro provides a much more enjoyable and future-proof smartphone experience. The price difference is justified by the significant leap in features and performance.

Emily Harper
Emily Harper

Technology Insights Specialist

Dedicated technology writer specializing in mobile device analysis and technology communication. Expert at translating complex smartphone features into clear, actionable insights for diverse audiences.

Key Strengths:

  • Mobile technology analysis
  • Digital media communication
  • Technical storytelling
  • User-centric technology insights

Bridging technical complexity with engaging, accessible narratives.