Nokia C32 vs Motorola Moto G34 - Detailed Phone Comparison

Detailed Comparison

Specification
Nokia C32
Nokia C32
Nokia

General

Launch Date February 25, 2023 December 29, 2023
Release Year 2023 2023

Physical

Volume 107.44 cm³ 97.1 cm³
Screen Size to Weight Ratio 3.26 "/g 3.63 "/g
Weight 199.4 g 179 g
Height 164.6 mm 162.7 mm
Width 75.9 mm 74.6 mm
Thickness 8.6 mm 8 mm
Foldable Design No No
Available Colors
  • Charcoal
  • Autumn Green
  • Beach Pink
  • Ice Blue
  • Ocean Green
  • Charcoal Black
  • Vanilla Cream

Display

Screen Size 6.5 " 6.5 "
Resolution 720 x 1600 720 x 1600
Aspect Ratio 20:9 20:9
Screen-to-Body Ratio 81.6 % 84 %
Pixel Density 270 PPI 270 PPI
Refresh Rate N/A 120 Hz
Typical Brightness N/A N/A
HBM Brightness N/A N/A
Peak Brightness N/A N/A

Hardware

Battery Capacity per Screen Area 118.34 mAh/in² 118.34 mAh/in²
Battery Density 46.54 mAh/cm³ 51.49 mAh/cm³
Battery Capacity 5000 mAh 5000 mAh
NFC Support No Yes
Chipset Unisoc SC9863A1 (22 nm) Qualcomm SM6375 Snapdragon 695 5G (6 nm)
CPU Octa-core (4x1.6 GHz Cortex-A55 & 4x1.2 GHz Cortex-A55) Octa-core (2x2.2 GHz Kryo 660 Gold & 6x1.7 GHz Kryo 660 Silver)
GPU IMG8322 Adreno 619

Connectivity

USB Version 2.0 2.0
OTG Support
DisplayPort
DisplayPort Version N/A N/A
USB Features USB Type-C 2.0 USB Type-C 2.0

Software

Operating System Android Android
Initial OS Version 13 13
Maximum OS Version

Comparison Summary

1. Specifications Comparison

FeatureNokia C32Motorola Moto G34Practical Impact
Design
Dimensions (mm)164.6 x 75.9 x 8.6162.7 x 74.6 x 8.0Moto G34 is slightly smaller and thinner.
Weight (g)199.4179Moto G34 is noticeably lighter, improving one-handed use.
BuildUnspecifiedUnspecifiedBuild quality and materials cannot be compared due to lack of information.
Display
Size (inches)6.56.5Same screen size.
Resolution (pixels)720 x 1600720 x 1600Same resolution, resulting in similar sharpness.
TypeIPS LCDIPS LCDBoth use IPS LCD technology, offering good color reproduction at the cost of contrast compared to OLED.
Refresh Rate (Hz)Unspecified120Moto G34's 120Hz refresh rate provides a significantly smoother and more responsive user experience.
Performance
ChipsetUnisoc SC9863A1 (22nm)Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G (6nm)Snapdragon 695 offers significantly better performance, efficiency, and 5G connectivity.
CPUOcta-core (4x1.6 GHz Cortex-A55 & 4x1.2 GHz Cortex-A55)Octa-core (2x2.2 GHz Kryo 660 Gold & 6x1.7 GHz Kryo 660 Silver)Moto G34 has a more powerful CPU architecture, translating to faster app loading, smoother multitasking, and better gaming performance.
GPUIMG8322Adreno 619Adreno 619 provides a considerable improvement in graphics performance for gaming and demanding applications.
RAM (GB)44/8Moto G34 offers an 8GB RAM option, further enhancing multitasking capabilities.
Camera
Rear Camera (MP)50 + 250 + 2Similar primary camera resolution, but sensor quality and features may differ.
Selfie Camera (MP)816Moto G34 has a significantly higher resolution selfie camera.
Video Recording1080p@30fps1080p@30fpsSimilar video recording capabilities.
Battery
Capacity (mAh)50005000Same battery capacity.
Fast Charging10W20WMoto G34 charges significantly faster.
OtherNFCMoto G34 includes NFC for contactless payments and other functionalities.

2. Key Differences Analysis

Motorola Moto G34 Advantages:

  • Significantly better performance: Snapdragon 695 chipset, superior CPU and GPU, and faster RAM offer a much smoother user experience.
  • 5G Connectivity: Enables faster download and upload speeds, improved network latency.
  • Higher Refresh Rate Display: 120Hz provides a smoother and more responsive visual experience.
  • Faster Charging: 20W fast charging reduces downtime.
  • NFC: Enables contactless payments and other convenient features.
  • Higher Resolution Selfie Camera: Captures more detailed selfies.

Nokia C32 Advantages:

  • Potentially Lower Price: Positioned in a lower price range.

Trade-offs:

  • Nokia C32: Sacrifices performance, features, and future-proofing for a lower price point.

3. User Profiles & Recommendations

Nokia C32: Suitable for budget-conscious users who prioritize basic communication and light usage. Ideal for users primarily needing calling, texting, and basic web browsing.

Motorola Moto G34: Suitable for users who demand better performance, smoother user experience, and future-proof features like 5G. Ideal for users who engage in moderate to heavy multitasking, gaming, media consumption, and utilize features like mobile payments.

4. Decision Framework

Key Questions for Buyers:

  1. What is your budget? The Nokia C32 is significantly cheaper.
  2. What is your primary phone usage? Basic communication vs. demanding applications and multitasking.
  3. How important are future-proof features like 5G?

Scenario-Based Recommendations:

  • Tight Budget, Basic Usage: Nokia C32
  • Balanced Performance and Price: Motorola Moto G34 (4GB RAM version)
  • Best Performance and Future-Proofing: Motorola Moto G34 (8GB RAM version)

My Choice: Motorola Moto G34 (8GB Version)

While the Nokia C32 offers a lower price point, the Moto G34 provides significantly better value in terms of performance, features, and overall user experience. The Snapdragon 695, coupled with the 120Hz display and 8GB RAM, ensures smooth and responsive performance for various tasks. The inclusion of 5G future-proofs the device. While specific build materials are unknown, the lighter weight of the Moto G34 contributes to better handling. The faster charging speed is a significant convenience. Even if the Moto G34 is slightly more expensive, the long-term benefits of its superior hardware and feature set make it a worthwhile investment for a more satisfying user experience.

Emily Harper
Emily Harper

Technology Insights Specialist

Dedicated technology writer specializing in mobile device analysis and technology communication. Expert at translating complex smartphone features into clear, actionable insights for diverse audiences.

Key Strengths:

  • Mobile technology analysis
  • Digital media communication
  • Technical storytelling
  • User-centric technology insights

Bridging technical complexity with engaging, accessible narratives.