Nokia C32 vs Motorola Edge 50 Neo - Detailed Phone Comparison

Detailed Comparison

Specification
Nokia C32
Nokia C32
Nokia

General

Launch Date February 25, 2023 August 29, 2024
Release Year 2023 2024

Physical

Volume 107.44 cm³ 88.87 cm³
Screen Size to Weight Ratio 3.26 "/g 3.74 "/g
Weight 199.4 g 171 g
Height 164.6 mm 154.1 mm
Width 75.9 mm 71.2 mm
Thickness 8.6 mm 8.1 mm
Foldable Design No No
Available Colors
  • Charcoal
  • Autumn Green
  • Beach Pink
  • Nautical Blue
  • Latte
  • Grisaille
  • Poinciana

Display

Screen Size 6.5 " 6.4 "
Resolution 720 x 1600 1256 x 2760
Aspect Ratio 20:9 20:9
Screen-to-Body Ratio 81.6 % 90.8 %
Pixel Density 270 PPI 474 PPI
Refresh Rate N/A 120 Hz
Typical Brightness N/A N/A
HBM Brightness N/A N/A
Peak Brightness N/A 3000 nits

Hardware

Battery Capacity per Screen Area 118.34 mAh/in² 105.22 mAh/in²
Battery Density 46.54 mAh/cm³ 48.5 mAh/cm³
Battery Capacity 5000 mAh 4310 mAh
NFC Support No Yes
Chipset Unisoc SC9863A1 (22 nm) Mediatek Dimensity 7300 (4 nm)
CPU Octa-core (4x1.6 GHz Cortex-A55 & 4x1.2 GHz Cortex-A55) Octa-core (4x2.5 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55)
GPU IMG8322 Mali-G615 MC2

Connectivity

USB Version 2.0 2.0
OTG Support
DisplayPort
DisplayPort Version N/A N/A
USB Features USB Type-C 2.0 USB Type-C 2.0

Software

Operating System Android Android
Initial OS Version 13 14
Maximum OS Version 19

Comparison Summary

1. Specifications Comparison

FeatureNokia C32Motorola Edge 50 NeoPractical Impact
Design
Dimensions (mm)164.6 x 75.9 x 8.6154.1 x 71.2 x 8.1Edge 50 Neo is noticeably more compact and potentially easier to handle one-handed.
Weight (g)199.4171Edge 50 Neo is significantly lighter, contributing to better portability and comfort.
Build MaterialNot specifiedNot specifiedBuild quality and durability are unknown for both devices.
Display
Display TypeIPS LCDLTPO P-OLEDEdge 50 Neo offers superior contrast, deeper blacks, and potentially better power efficiency due to the OLED technology.
Display Size (inches)6.56.4Negligible size difference.
Resolution720 x 16001256 x 2760Edge 50 Neo boasts a much sharper and more detailed display due to its significantly higher resolution.
Refresh RateNot specified120HzEdge 50 Neo provides a smoother and more responsive user experience, especially noticeable in scrolling and gaming.
Performance
ChipsetUnisoc SC9863A1 (22nm)Mediatek Dimensity 7300 (4nm)Edge 50 Neo will deliver significantly better performance, efficiency, and thermal management due to its more advanced processor.
CPUOcta-core (4x1.6 GHz Cortex-A55 & 4x1.2 GHz Cortex-A55)Octa-core (4x2.5 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55)Edge 50 Neo will offer substantially faster processing speeds, enabling smoother multitasking and better performance in demanding apps.
RAM4GB12GBEdge 50 Neo's larger RAM allows for more apps to run in the background without performance slowdown.
OSAndroid 13Android 14Edge 50 Neo runs a newer version of Android, potentially offering newer features and security updates.
Camera
Rear Camera50MP + 2MP50MP + 13MP + 10MPEdge 50 Neo has a more versatile camera system with an ultrawide and telephoto lens.
Front Camera8MP32MPEdge 50 Neo offers a higher resolution front camera for better selfies.
Video Recording1080p@30fpsUp to 4K@30fpsEdge 50 Neo supports higher resolution video recording.
Battery
Capacity5000mAh4310mAhNokia C32 has a larger battery capacity, potentially offering longer battery life.
Fast Charging10W68WEdge 50 Neo supports significantly faster charging, minimizing downtime.

2. Key Differences Analysis

Motorola Edge 50 Neo Advantages:

  • Significantly better performance: The Dimensity 7300 chipset and larger RAM provide a vastly superior user experience for demanding tasks and multitasking.
  • Higher quality display: The P-OLED display with a 120Hz refresh rate delivers vibrant colors, deep blacks, and smooth visuals.
  • More versatile camera system: The inclusion of ultrawide and telephoto lenses provides greater flexibility for photography.
  • Faster charging: 68W fast charging significantly reduces charging time.
  • More compact and lightweight design: Easier to handle and carry.

Nokia C32 Advantages:

  • Larger battery capacity: Potentially longer battery life, though real-world usage will depend on various factors.
  • Lower price: Offers a more budget-friendly option.

3. User Profiles & Recommendations

Nokia C32: Ideal for budget-conscious users who prioritize basic communication and essential tasks. Suitable use cases include calling, texting, web browsing, and light social media usage.

Motorola Edge 50 Neo: Best suited for users who demand good performance, a high-quality display, and a versatile camera system. Excellent for gaming, media consumption, photography enthusiasts, and power users.

4. Decision Framework

Key Questions for Buyers:

  1. What is your budget? The Nokia C32 is significantly cheaper.
  2. What are your primary smartphone usage patterns? For basic tasks, the C32 may suffice. For demanding tasks and multimedia consumption, the Edge 50 Neo is far superior.
  3. How important is battery life versus charging speed? The C32 has a larger battery, but the Edge 50 Neo charges much faster.

My Choice: Motorola Edge 50 Neo

While the Nokia C32 offers a larger battery and a lower price point, the Motorola Edge 50 Neo is the clear winner for me. The superior performance, higher quality display, more versatile camera system, faster charging, and more modern design outweigh the benefits of the C32. The difference in user experience would be significant, making the Edge 50 Neo a much more enjoyable and future-proof device. The price difference is justifiable considering the substantial upgrade in features and overall quality. I value a smooth and responsive user experience, a good camera, and a vibrant display, all of which the Edge 50 Neo delivers convincingly.

Emily Harper
Emily Harper

Technology Insights Specialist

Dedicated technology writer specializing in mobile device analysis and technology communication. Expert at translating complex smartphone features into clear, actionable insights for diverse audiences.

Key Strengths:

  • Mobile technology analysis
  • Digital media communication
  • Technical storytelling
  • User-centric technology insights

Bridging technical complexity with engaging, accessible narratives.