Nokia C31 vs Motorola Edge 40 Neo - Detailed Phone Comparison

Detailed Comparison

Specification
Nokia C31
Nokia C31
Nokia

General

Launch Date September 1, 2022 September 14, 2023
Release Year 2022 2023

Physical

Volume 113.5 cm³ 90.78 cm³
Screen Size to Weight Ratio 3.38 "/g 3.85 "/g
Weight 200 g 170 g
Height 169.2 mm 159.6 mm
Width 78 mm 72 mm
Thickness 8.6 mm 7.9 mm
Foldable Design No No
Available Colors
  • Mint
  • Charcoal
  • Cyan
  • Black
  • Peach Fuzz
  • Soothing Sea
  • Caneel Bay

Display

Screen Size 6.75 " 6.55 "
Resolution 720 x 1600 1080 x 2400
Aspect Ratio 20:9 20:9
Screen-to-Body Ratio 83.4 % 90.1 %
Pixel Density 260 PPI 402 PPI
Refresh Rate N/A 144 Hz
Typical Brightness N/A N/A
HBM Brightness N/A N/A
Peak Brightness N/A 1300 nits

Hardware

Battery Capacity per Screen Area 110.84 mAh/in² 116.54 mAh/in²
Battery Density 44.49 mAh/cm³ 55.08 mAh/cm³
Battery Capacity 5050 mAh 5000 mAh
NFC Support No Yes
Chipset Unisoc SC9863A (28 nm) MediaTek Dimensity 7030 (6 nm)
CPU Octa-core (4x1.6 GHz Cortex-A55 & 4x1.2 GHz Cortex-A55) Octa-core (2x2.5 GHz Cortex-A78 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55)
GPU IMG8322 Mali-G610 MC3

Connectivity

USB Version 2.0 2.0
OTG Support 1 1
DisplayPort
DisplayPort Version N/A N/A
USB Features microUSB 2.0, OTG USB Type-C 2.0, OTG

Software

Operating System Android Android
Initial OS Version 12 13
Maximum OS Version 15

Comparison Summary

Alright, let's dive into a detailed comparison of the Nokia C31 and the Motorola Edge 40 Neo. As a tech journalist with an engineering background, I’m keen to dissect these devices not just by their specs, but by how those specs translate into real-world experiences. Let's get to it!

1. Specifications Breakdown

FeatureNokia C31Motorola Edge 40 NeoReal-World Implications
Design
Dimensions169.2 × 78 × 8.6 mm159.6 × 72 × 7.9 mmEdge 40 Neo is more compact, making it easier to handle and pocket.
Weight200g170gEdge 40 Neo feels lighter and more comfortable for extended use.
Build MaterialUnknownCorning Gorilla Glass 3Edge 40 Neo has a tougher screen, less prone to scratches.
Display
Size6.75"6.55"Nokia C31 offers a slightly larger screen, but not as sharp as the Edge 40 Neo.
Resolution720x16001080x2400Edge 40 Neo has a significantly sharper display, making text and images clearer.
Pixel Density260 PPI402 PPIEdge 40 Neo’s higher PPI means crisper details and a better overall visual experience.
TechnologyIPS LCDP-OLEDEdge 40 Neo's P-OLED display offers superior colors, deeper blacks, and better viewing angles.
Refresh Rate60Hz144HzEdge 40 Neo’s 144Hz provides much smoother scrolling and animations, especially for gaming.
Brightness0 nits1300 nitsEdge 40 Neo is exceptionally bright, usable in direct sunlight, where the Nokia would struggle.
Performance
ChipsetUnisoc SC9863A (28 nm)MediaTek Dimensity 7030 (6 nm)Edge 40 Neo has a much more powerful and efficient processor.
AnTuTu Score109,200527,666Edge 40 Neo is significantly faster, handling apps, multitasking, and games much better.
GPUIMG8322Mali-G610 MC3Edge 40 Neo offers better graphics performance, especially for gaming.
Camera
Rear Camera13MP50MP (OIS)Edge 40 Neo captures higher-resolution photos, and the OIS helps with sharper, clearer shots.
Selfie Camera5MP32MPEdge 40 Neo takes more detailed selfies, better for video calls and social media.
Additional Cameras2MP (Depth), 2MP (Macro)13MP (Wide Angle + Macro)Edge 40 Neo has a wider and more practical secondary camera.
Video Recording1080p@30fps4K@30fps, 1080p@upto 240fpsEdge 40 Neo can record much higher quality video, capturing more detailed moments.
DXOMark ScoreNot Tested103Edge 40 Neo scored 103 on DXOMark for Mobile, 102 for Photo and 116 for Video.
StabilizationNoneOIS, EISEdge 40 Neo offers better image and video stabilization.
Battery Life
Capacity5050mAh5000mAhBoth phones offer comparable battery life for a full day of use.
Charging10W68WEdge 40 Neo charges dramatically faster, minimizing downtime.
Software
OSAndroid 12Android 13Edge 40 Neo has a newer OS, meaning more up-to-date security and features, along with a guaranteed update to Android 15.
Connectivity
WiFi802.11b/g/n802.11a/b/g/n/ac/axEdge 40 Neo has faster Wi-Fi speeds and better network performance.
Bluetooth4.25.4Edge 40 Neo has a more modern Bluetooth, better audio quality and more efficient connectivity.
GPSA-GPS, GLONASS, SUPL, GalileoA-GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, SUPL, Galileo, BeiDou (B1)Edge 40 Neo has a more accurate GPS, thanks to more constellations.
SIMDual Nano SIMDual Nano SIM, eSIMEdge 40 Neo offers the flexibility of an eSIM, allowing for easier switching between carriers.
Storage
Internal Storage64GB or 128GB256GBEdge 40 Neo has double the storage, great for apps, photos, videos, etc.
RAM4GB8GB or 12GBEdge 40 Neo can keep more apps running in the background, leading to smoother operation.
Expandable storageNoNoNeither phone supports additional storage.
AudioBasicDolby Atmos, Stereo Speakers, 2 microphonesEdge 40 Neo delivers much higher quality and immersive sound.
SecurityRear Mounted FingerprintBasic fingerprint SensorBoth phones have fingerprint sensors, with the Edge 40 Neo's being basic.
SensorsProximity, AccelerometerFingerprint, Proximity, Accelerometer, Compass, GyroscopeEdge 40 Neo comes with extra sensors for advanced features.
## 2. Key Insights

Nokia C31:

  • Strengths: The Nokia C31 is a budget-friendly phone that offers a large display and a decent battery.
  • Competitive Advantages: Its main advantage is its lower price, making it accessible for those with budget limitations.
  • Limitations: It lags behind in processing power, display quality, camera performance, and overall speed compared to the Edge 40 Neo.

Motorola Edge 40 Neo:

  • Strengths: The Edge 40 Neo shines with its superior display (P-OLED, 144Hz, and high brightness), powerful processor, higher-resolution camera, faster charging, and enhanced connectivity.
  • Competitive Advantages: Its combination of advanced features, performance, and premium display make it a standout choice.
  • Limitations: Its price is higher than the Nokia C31, making it less accessible to budget-conscious users.

User Experience: The Edge 40 Neo provides a significantly better user experience, thanks to its smoother display, faster performance, and superior camera capabilities. The Nokia C31 is functional but noticeably slower, and its display is less vibrant and sharp.

Trade-offs: The Nokia C31’s main trade-off is performance and visual experience for a lower price. The Edge 40 Neo trades a higher price for a much better, almost premium, experience.

3. User Profiles and Recommendations

Nokia C31:

  • Best Suited For: Users on a very tight budget who need a large screen for basic tasks like browsing, social media, and calls.
  • Use Cases: Perfect as a backup phone or for first-time smartphone users who don’t need high performance or exceptional camera features.
  • Price-to-Value: The low price makes it a reasonable choice for basic functionalities and very light usage.

Motorola Edge 40 Neo:

  • Best Suited For: Tech enthusiasts, frequent social media users, gamers, and anyone who appreciates a smooth and responsive experience with high-quality photos and video.
  • Use Cases: Ideal for those who want a phone for everyday multitasking, content creation, mobile gaming, and watching videos in high quality.
  • Price-to-Value: While it is more expensive, the superior display, performance, and camera features justify the higher cost for users who want a more premium experience.

4. Buying Decision Framework

Here are three practical questions to help users decide between these phones:

  1. How crucial is display quality to you?
    • If you value crisp, vibrant, and smooth visuals for media consumption and everyday use, the Edge 40 Neo is the clear winner. If the display isn’t a high priority, then you might manage with the Nokia C31.
  2. How important is performance and speed?
    • If you need a phone for multitasking, gaming, and running demanding apps smoothly, the Edge 40 Neo’s powerful processor will make a big difference. For very basic usage where waiting a second longer isn't a deal breaker, the C31 can handle it.
  3. What’s your budget?
    • If you're on a tight budget, the Nokia C31 might be your only viable option. If you have some flexibility, the Edge 40 Neo offers significantly better value, especially in the long run, due to its better performance and features.

Scenario-Based Recommendations:

  • Budget Shopper: If your budget is extremely tight and you prioritize cost over all else, the Nokia C31 is acceptable for basic use.
  • Casual User: If you want a smooth and responsive phone for browsing, social media, and taking basic photos, the Edge 40 Neo offers great performance and value.
  • Power User: For gamers, photographers, or anyone who needs a phone for demanding tasks, the Edge 40 Neo is undoubtedly the better choice.
  • Content Creator: For capturing high-quality photos and videos for social media or projects, the Edge 40 Neo is perfect for content creation.

My Choice

If I were choosing between these two phones, I would absolutely go with the Motorola Edge 40 Neo. While it's more expensive, the difference in performance, display quality, and camera capabilities is night and day. As someone who uses my phone for everything from heavy multitasking to mobile gaming and photography, the Edge 40 Neo's features would make it worth the higher investment. The P-OLED screen alone, with its 144Hz refresh rate and amazing brightness, makes it a joy to use. The significantly more powerful processor and much better camera just seal the deal for me. I would be incredibly frustrated using the Nokia C31 as my primary device due to its noticeable performance and display limitations. The Edge 40 Neo, in my opinion, provides a far superior user experience that justifies the higher price.

Alex Griffin
Alex Griffin

Technology analyst specializing in mobile devices and consumer electronics.

Core Expertise

  • Mobile technology analysis
  • Consumer electronics evaluation
  • Technical specification interpretation
  • User experience insights

Professional Mission Empowering readers to make informed technology decisions by transforming intricate specifications into understandable, practical guidance.

Demystifying technology, one device at a time.