Nokia C22 vs Xiaomi Redmi 14C - Detailed Phone Comparison

Detailed Comparison

Specification
Nokia C22
Nokia C22
Nokia

General

Launch Date February 25, 2023 August 30, 2024
Release Year 2023 2024

Physical

Volume 107.44 cm³ 109.67 cm³
Screen Size to Weight Ratio 3.42 "/g 3.26 "/g
Weight 190 g 211 g
Height 164.6 mm 171.9 mm
Width 75.9 mm 77.8 mm
Thickness 8.6 mm 8.2 mm
Foldable Design No No
Available Colors
  • Midnight Black
  • Sand
  • Midnight Black
  • Starry Blue
  • Sage Green
  • Dreamy Purple

Display

Screen Size 6.5 " 6.88 "
Resolution 720 x 1600 720 x 1640
Aspect Ratio 20:9 21:9
Screen-to-Body Ratio 81.6 % 84 %
Pixel Density 270 PPI 260 PPI
Refresh Rate N/A 120 Hz
Typical Brightness N/A 450 nits
HBM Brightness N/A 600 nits
Peak Brightness N/A N/A

Hardware

Battery Capacity per Screen Area 118.34 mAh/in² 109.01 mAh/in²
Battery Density 46.54 mAh/cm³ 47.05 mAh/cm³
Battery Capacity 5000 mAh 5160 mAh
NFC Support No Yes
Chipset Unisoc SC9863A (28 nm) Mediatek Helio G81 Ultra
CPU Octa-core (4x1.6 GHz Cortex-A55 & 4x1.2 GHz Cortex-A55) Octa-core (2x2.0 GHz Cortex-A75 & 6x1.8 GHz Cortex-A55)
GPU IMG8322 Mali-G52 MC2

Connectivity

USB Version 2.0 2.0
OTG Support
DisplayPort
DisplayPort Version N/A N/A
USB Features USB Type-C 2.0 USB Type-C 2.0

Software

Operating System Android Android
Initial OS Version 13 14
Maximum OS Version

Comparison Summary

1. Specifications Comparison

FeatureNokia C22Xiaomi Redmi 14CPractical Impact
Design
Dimensions (mm)164.6 x 75.9 x 8.6171.9 x 77.8 x 8.2Redmi 14C is noticeably larger
Weight (g)190211C22 is significantly lighter and more pocketable
BuildUnspecifiedUnspecifiedBuild quality comparison not possible without further info
Display
Size (inches)6.56.88Redmi 14C offers a larger screen for media consumption
Resolution (pixels)720 x 1600720 x 1640Negligible difference in sharpness due to similar PPI
TypeIPS LCDIPS LCDBoth offer similar color accuracy and viewing angles
Refresh Rate (Hz)Unspecified120Redmi 14C's 120Hz offers smoother scrolling and animations
Performance
ChipsetUnisoc SC9863AMediatek Helio G81 UltraRedmi 14C boasts a significantly more powerful processor
CPUOcta-core (4x1.6 GHz Cortex-A55 & 4x1.2 GHz Cortex-A55)Octa-core (2x2.0 GHz Cortex-A75 & 6x1.8 GHz Cortex-A55)Redmi 14C will handle demanding tasks and multitasking much better
GPUIMG8322Mali-G52 MC2Redmi 14C provides a better gaming and graphics experience
RAM (GB)2/34/6/8Redmi 14C offers more RAM for smoother multitasking
Storage (GB)64/128128/256Redmi 14C provides more storage options
Camera
Rear Camera (MP)13 + 250 + 0.8Redmi 14C's 50MP main sensor likely captures more detail
Front Camera (MP)813Redmi 14C's selfie camera has higher resolution
Video Recording1080p@30fps1080p@30fps, Slow-mo @120fpsRedmi offers slow-motion video recording
Battery
Capacity (mAh)50005160Negligible difference in battery capacity
Fast Charging10W18WRedmi 14C charges significantly faster
Other
NFCNoYesRedmi 14C supports contactless payments and data transfer
OSAndroid 13Android 14Redmi 14C runs a newer Android version with potential feature and security updates
Price RangeLowMediumRedmi 14C is more expensive but offers superior specs

2. Key Differences Analysis

Nokia C22 Advantages:

  • Lighter and More Compact: Significantly easier to handle and carry.
  • Lower Price: More budget-friendly.

Xiaomi Redmi 14C Advantages:

  • Significantly Better Performance: Much faster processor, GPU, and more RAM for smoother multitasking and gaming.
  • Larger Display with Higher Refresh Rate: More immersive media consumption and smoother scrolling.
  • Better Camera System: Higher resolution main and selfie cameras potentially capturing more detail. Slow-motion video recording.
  • Faster Charging: Less downtime.
  • NFC: Enables contactless payments and other convenient features.
  • Newer Android Version: Potentially longer software support and newer features.

Trade-offs:

  • Redmi 14C's larger size and weight might be less comfortable for one-handed use.
  • C22 compromises performance and features for affordability.

3. User Profiles & Recommendations

Nokia C22:

  • Ideal User: Budget-conscious users primarily needing basic communication (calls, texts, light browsing). Users prioritizing a compact and lightweight phone. Seniors or users new to smartphones.
  • Use Cases: Basic communication, simple web browsing, casual social media.

Xiaomi Redmi 14C:

  • Ideal User: Users seeking a well-rounded smartphone with good performance for gaming, media consumption, and multitasking. Users who value a larger display and faster charging.
  • Use Cases: Mobile gaming, media consumption (videos, movies), social media, multitasking, photography.

4. Decision Framework

Key Questions for Buyers:

  1. What is your budget? The C22 is significantly cheaper.
  2. What are your primary smartphone usage patterns? Basic communication vs. demanding tasks and entertainment.
  3. Do you prioritize portability and ease of handling or a larger screen and better performance?

Scenario-Based Recommendations:

  • Tight Budget, Basic Needs: Nokia C22
  • Balanced Performance and Price: Xiaomi Redmi 14C

My Choice: Xiaomi Redmi 14C

While the Nokia C22 offers an attractive price point, the Redmi 14C provides significantly better value for the extra cost. The performance difference between the Unisoc SC9863A and the Helio G81 Ultra is substantial, impacting everyday usability. The Redmi 14C's larger display with a 120Hz refresh rate, better camera system, faster charging, NFC functionality, and newer Android version make it a much more capable and future-proof device. For the average user, these advantages outweigh the slight increase in size and weight. The C22 only makes sense for extremely budget-constrained users who prioritize a compact phone above all else.

Emily Harper
Emily Harper

Technology Insights Specialist

Dedicated technology writer specializing in mobile device analysis and technology communication. Expert at translating complex smartphone features into clear, actionable insights for diverse audiences.

Key Strengths:

  • Mobile technology analysis
  • Digital media communication
  • Technical storytelling
  • User-centric technology insights

Bridging technical complexity with engaging, accessible narratives.