Nokia C22 vs Xiaomi Poco F5 - Detailed Phone Comparison

Detailed Comparison

Specification
Nokia C22
Nokia C22
Nokia

General

Launch Date February 25, 2023 May 1, 2023
Release Year 2023 2023

Physical

Volume 107.44 cm³ 95.45 cm³
Screen Size to Weight Ratio 3.42 "/g 3.69 "/g
Weight 190 g 181 g
Height 164.6 mm 161.1 mm
Width 75.9 mm 75 mm
Thickness 8.6 mm 7.9 mm
Foldable Design No No
Available Colors
  • Midnight Black
  • Sand
  • Black
  • Blue
  • White

Display

Screen Size 6.5 " 6.67 "
Resolution 720 x 1600 1080 x 2400
Aspect Ratio 20:9 20:9
Screen-to-Body Ratio 81.6 % 88.9 %
Pixel Density 270 PPI 395 PPI
Refresh Rate N/A 120 Hz
Typical Brightness N/A 500 nits
HBM Brightness N/A N/A
Peak Brightness N/A 1000 nits

Hardware

Battery Capacity per Screen Area 118.34 mAh/in² 112.39 mAh/in²
Battery Density 46.54 mAh/cm³ 52.38 mAh/cm³
Battery Capacity 5000 mAh 5000 mAh
NFC Support No Yes
Chipset Unisoc SC9863A (28 nm) Qualcomm SM7475-AB Snapdragon 7+ Gen 2 (4 nm)
CPU Octa-core (4x1.6 GHz Cortex-A55 & 4x1.2 GHz Cortex-A55) Octa-core (1x2.91 GHz Cortex-X2 & 3x2.49 GHz Cortex-A710 & 4x1.8 GHz Cortex-A510)
GPU IMG8322 Adreno 725

Connectivity

USB Version 2.0 2.0
OTG Support 1
DisplayPort
DisplayPort Version N/A N/A
USB Features USB Type-C 2.0 USB Type-C 2.0, OTG

Software

Operating System Android Android
Initial OS Version 13 13
Maximum OS Version 14

Comparison Summary

1. Specifications Comparison

FeatureNokia C22Xiaomi Poco F5Practical Impact
Design
Dimensions (mm)164.6 x 75.9 x 8.6161.1 x 75 x 7.9Poco F5 is slightly smaller and thinner.
Weight (g)190181Poco F5 is lighter, more comfortable for extended use.
BuildMaterial specifications missing for both, limiting comparison.
Display
Display TypeIPS LCDAMOLEDPoco F5 offers significantly better contrast, colors, and viewing angles.
Display Size (inches)6.56.67Negligible size difference.
Resolution720 x 16001080 x 2400Poco F5 has much sharper display, better for media consumption.
Refresh RateNot specified120HzPoco F5's high refresh rate provides smoother scrolling and animations.
HDRNoHDR10+, Dolby VisionPoco F5 supports HDR content for a wider dynamic range and vibrant visuals.
Performance
ChipsetUnisoc SC9863A (28nm)Qualcomm Snapdragon 7+ Gen 2 (4nm)Poco F5 offers vastly superior processing power and efficiency.
CPUOcta-core (4x1.6 GHz Cortex-A55 & 4x1.2 GHz Cortex-A55)Octa-core (1x2.91 GHz Cortex-X2 & 3x2.49 GHz Cortex-A710 & 4x1.8 GHz Cortex-A510)Poco F5 will be significantly faster and more responsive in demanding tasks and multitasking.
GPUIMG8322Adreno 725Poco F5 provides significantly better graphics performance for gaming and media.
RAM2GB/3GB8GB/12GBPoco F5 offers substantially more RAM for smoother multitasking and app performance.
Storage64GB256GBPoco F5 provides much larger storage capacity.
Camera
Rear Camera13MP + 2MP64MP + 8MP + 2MPPoco F5 boasts higher resolution sensors and a wider range of lenses.
Front Camera8MP16MPPoco F5 has a higher resolution front camera for better selfies.
Video Recording1080p@30fps4K@30fps, 1080p@120fpsPoco F5 offers higher resolution and frame rate video recording capabilities.
Battery
Capacity5000 mAh5000 mAhSimilar battery capacity.
Fast Charging10W67WPoco F5 charges significantly faster.

2. Key Differences Analysis

Nokia C22 Advantages:

  • Lower Price: The Nokia C22 is significantly cheaper, making it accessible for budget-conscious buyers.

Xiaomi Poco F5 Advantages:

  • Superior Performance: Significantly faster processor, more RAM, and a better GPU deliver a much smoother and more responsive user experience.
  • Better Display: The AMOLED display with a 120Hz refresh rate provides vibrant colors, deeper blacks, and smoother animations.
  • Enhanced Camera System: Higher resolution sensors, wider lens selection, and better video recording capabilities.
  • Faster Charging: 67W fast charging allows for much quicker top-ups compared to the Nokia C22's 10W charging.

Trade-offs:

  • Price: The superior features of the Poco F5 come at a higher price.

3. User Profiles & Recommendations

Nokia C22:

  • Ideal User: Users on a very tight budget who primarily use their phone for basic tasks like calling, texting, and light web browsing.
  • Use Cases: Basic communication, simple apps, undemanding tasks.

Xiaomi Poco F5:

  • Ideal User: Users who value performance, a high-quality display, a good camera, and fast charging. Suitable for gamers, content creators, and power users.
  • Use Cases: Demanding mobile gaming, media consumption, content creation, multitasking, photography.

4. Decision Framework

Key Questions for Buyers:

  1. What is your budget? The price difference is significant.
  2. What are your primary phone usage patterns? Basic tasks vs. demanding applications.
  3. Which features are most important to you? Performance, display quality, camera, battery life.

Scenario-Based Recommendations:

  • Tight Budget, Basic Needs: Nokia C22
  • Balanced Needs, Moderate Budget: Consider other mid-range options as the price jump to the Poco F5 is substantial.
  • Performance and Features Focused: Xiaomi Poco F5

My Choice: Xiaomi Poco F5

Reasoning: While the Nokia C22 offers an entry-level option for budget-constrained users, the Poco F5 provides a significantly superior user experience across the board. The performance difference is substantial, and the improved display, camera, and charging capabilities make it a much more versatile and future-proof device. For a moderate increase in price, the Poco F5 offers a substantial leap in functionality and user experience, making it a more compelling choice for most users. Even though the Nokia C22 fulfills basic needs, the long-term value and capabilities of the Poco F5 justify the higher price for my personal needs.

Emily Harper
Emily Harper

Technology Insights Specialist

Dedicated technology writer specializing in mobile device analysis and technology communication. Expert at translating complex smartphone features into clear, actionable insights for diverse audiences.

Key Strengths:

  • Mobile technology analysis
  • Digital media communication
  • Technical storytelling
  • User-centric technology insights

Bridging technical complexity with engaging, accessible narratives.