Nokia C22 vs Realme C51 - Detailed Phone Comparison

Detailed Comparison

Specification
Nokia C22
Nokia C22
Nokia
Realme C51
Realme C51
Realme

General

Launch Date February 25, 2023 August 1, 2023
Release Year 2023 2023

Physical

Volume 107.44 cm³ 102.59 cm³
Screen Size to Weight Ratio 3.42 "/g 3.62 "/g
Weight 190 g 186 g
Height 164.6 mm 167.2 mm
Width 75.9 mm 76.7 mm
Thickness 8.6 mm 8 mm
Foldable Design No No
Available Colors
  • Midnight Black
  • Sand
  • Mint Green
  • Carbon Black

Display

Screen Size 6.5 " 6.74 "
Resolution 720 x 1600 720 x 1600
Aspect Ratio 20:9 20:9
Screen-to-Body Ratio 81.6 % 85.5 %
Pixel Density 270 PPI 260 PPI
Refresh Rate N/A 90 Hz
Typical Brightness N/A N/A
HBM Brightness N/A N/A
Peak Brightness N/A 560 nits

Hardware

Battery Capacity per Screen Area 118.34 mAh/in² 110.07 mAh/in²
Battery Density 46.54 mAh/cm³ 48.74 mAh/cm³
Battery Capacity 5000 mAh 5000 mAh
NFC Support No Yes
Chipset Unisoc SC9863A (28 nm) Unisoc Tiger T612 (12 nm)
CPU Octa-core (4x1.6 GHz Cortex-A55 & 4x1.2 GHz Cortex-A55) Octa-core (2x1.8 GHz Cortex-A75 & 6x1.8 GHz Cortex-A55)
GPU IMG8322 Mali-G57

Connectivity

USB Version 2.0 2.0
OTG Support 1
DisplayPort
DisplayPort Version N/A N/A
USB Features USB Type-C 2.0 USB Type-C 2.0, OTG

Software

Operating System Android Android
Initial OS Version 13 13
Maximum OS Version

Comparison Summary

1. Specifications Comparison

FeatureNokia C22Realme C51Practical Impact
Design
Dimensions (mm)164.6 x 75.9 x 8.6167.2 x 76.7 x 8Realme C51 is slightly larger and thinner. Negligible difference in everyday use.
Weight (g)190186Realme C51 is slightly lighter, but the difference is minimal.
Display
Size (inches)6.56.74Realme C51 offers a slightly larger screen for more immersive media consumption.
Resolution (px)720 x 1600720 x 1600Identical resolution; sharpness will be similar given the slight size difference.
Refresh Rate (Hz)Not specified90Realme C51's 90Hz refresh rate will provide a smoother, more responsive user experience, especially noticeable in scrolling and gaming.
Display TypeIPS LCDIPS LCDBoth offer decent color reproduction but may lack the deep blacks and vibrant colors of AMOLED displays.
Performance
ChipsetUnisoc SC9863A (28nm)Unisoc Tiger T612 (12nm)Realme C51's 12nm chipset will likely offer significantly better performance and power efficiency.
CPUOcta-core (4x1.6 GHz A55 & 4x1.2 GHz A55)Octa-core (2x1.8 GHz A75 & 6x1.8 GHz A55)Realme C51 has more powerful cores, leading to faster app loading, multitasking, and smoother overall performance.
RAM (GB)2/34Realme C51's 4GB RAM enables better multitasking and smoother performance with multiple apps open.
Camera
Rear Camera (MP)13 + 250 + 0.8Realme C51 boasts a much higher resolution main sensor potentially capturing more detailed photos.
Front Camera (MP)85Nokia C22 has a higher resolution front camera, potentially resulting in better selfies.
Battery
Capacity (mAh)50005000Identical battery capacity suggests similar potential battery life, though real-world usage will depend on other factors.
Fast Charging (W)1033Realme C51's significantly faster charging will top up the battery much quicker.
Other
NFCNoYesRealme C51 supports contactless payments and data transfer via NFC.
OSAndroid 13Android 13Both run on the latest Android version, offering similar software features.

2. Key Differences Analysis

Realme C51 Advantages:

  • Significantly better performance: The more powerful processor, larger RAM, and smaller chipset node size translate to a smoother, faster user experience.
  • Faster charging: 33W fast charging significantly reduces downtime compared to the Nokia C22's 10W.
  • Higher resolution main camera: The 50MP sensor has the potential to capture more detail and better low-light photos.
  • Smoother Display: 90Hz refresh rate drastically improves user experience.
  • NFC: Enables convenient contactless payments and data transfer.

Nokia C22 Advantages:

  • Potentially Lower Price: Given its "low price" range designation, it could be significantly more affordable.
  • Higher Resolution Front Camera: May be preferred by users who prioritize selfie quality.

Trade-offs:

  • Realme C51: Potentially higher price for its superior performance and features.
  • Nokia C22: Compromises on performance, camera quality, and charging speed for potential affordability.

3. User Profiles & Recommendations

Nokia C22: Ideal for budget-conscious users who primarily use their phone for basic tasks like calling, texting, and light web browsing. Good for users who prioritize affordability over performance.

Realme C51: Suitable for users who demand smoother performance for gaming, multitasking, and media consumption. The faster charging and NFC are attractive bonuses. Good for budget-conscious users who still want a good level of performance and modern features.

4. Decision Framework

Key Questions:

  1. What is your budget? The Nokia C22 is likely more affordable.
  2. What are your primary phone usage patterns? Basic tasks vs. demanding apps and gaming.
  3. Which features are most important to you? Performance, camera quality, charging speed, NFC.

Scenario-Based Recommendations:

  • Tight Budget, Basic Usage: Nokia C22
  • Moderate Budget, Balanced Needs: Realme C51
  • Prioritize Performance and Features: Realme C51

My Choice: Realme C51

While pricing isn't explicitly stated, the performance and feature advantages of the Realme C51 are substantial. The smoother display, faster processor, increased RAM, quicker charging, and NFC functionality offer a significantly better user experience. Even if the Realme C51 is slightly more expensive, the value proposition leans heavily in its favor for most users beyond those strictly seeking the absolute cheapest option. The 12nm chipset versus the 28nm on the Nokia C22 signifies a generational leap in efficiency and performance, making it a future-proof choice.

Emily Harper
Emily Harper

Technology Insights Specialist

Dedicated technology writer specializing in mobile device analysis and technology communication. Expert at translating complex smartphone features into clear, actionable insights for diverse audiences.

Key Strengths:

  • Mobile technology analysis
  • Digital media communication
  • Technical storytelling
  • User-centric technology insights

Bridging technical complexity with engaging, accessible narratives.