Nokia C22 vs Oppo Reno11 - Detailed Phone Comparison

Detailed Comparison

Specification
Nokia C22
Nokia C22
Nokia

General

Launch Date February 25, 2023 January 25, 2024
Release Year 2023 2024

Physical

Volume 107.44 cm³ 95.32 cm³
Screen Size to Weight Ratio 3.42 "/g 3.68 "/g
Weight 190 g 182 g
Height 164.6 mm 162.4 mm
Width 75.9 mm 74.3 mm
Thickness 8.6 mm 7.9 mm
Foldable Design No No
Available Colors
  • Midnight Black
  • Sand
  • Wave Green
  • Rock Grey

Display

Screen Size 6.5 " 6.7 "
Resolution 720 x 1600 1080 x 2412
Aspect Ratio 20:9 20:9
Screen-to-Body Ratio 81.6 % 89.5 %
Pixel Density 270 PPI 394 PPI
Refresh Rate N/A 120 Hz
Typical Brightness N/A N/A
HBM Brightness N/A 800 nits
Peak Brightness N/A 950 nits

Hardware

Battery Capacity per Screen Area 118.34 mAh/in² 111.38 mAh/in²
Battery Density 46.54 mAh/cm³ 52.45 mAh/cm³
Battery Capacity 5000 mAh 5000 mAh
NFC Support No Yes
Chipset Unisoc SC9863A (28 nm) Mediatek Dimensity 7050 (6 nm)
CPU Octa-core (4x1.6 GHz Cortex-A55 & 4x1.2 GHz Cortex-A55) Octa-core (2x2.6 GHz Cortex-A78 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55)
GPU IMG8322 Mali-G68 MC4

Connectivity

USB Version 2.0 2.0
OTG Support 1
DisplayPort
DisplayPort Version N/A N/A
USB Features USB Type-C 2.0 USB Type-C 2.0, OTG

Software

Operating System Android Android
Initial OS Version 13 14
Maximum OS Version

Comparison Summary

1. Specifications Comparison

FeatureNokia C22Oppo Reno11Practical Impact
Design
Dimensions (mm)164.6 x 75.9 x 8.6162.4 x 74.3 x 7.9Reno11 is slightly smaller and thinner, making it potentially more pocketable.
Weight (g)190182Reno11 is lighter, improving one-handed use.
BuildUnspecifiedUnspecifiedBuild quality and materials cannot be compared without further information.
Display
Display TypeIPS LCDAMOLEDReno11's AMOLED offers deeper blacks, more vibrant colors, and better power efficiency.
Size (inches)6.56.7Reno11 offers a slightly larger screen for more immersive content consumption.
Resolution720 x 16001080 x 2412Reno11 has significantly higher resolution, resulting in sharper text and images.
Refresh RateUnspecified120HzReno11's 120Hz refresh rate provides smoother scrolling and animations. C22's refresh rate is unknown.
PPI270394Reno11's higher PPI translates to a crisper and more detailed display.
HDRNoHDR10+Reno11 supports HDR10+ for enhanced dynamic range in compatible content.
Performance
ChipsetUnisoc SC9863A (28nm)Mediatek Dimensity 7050 (6nm)Reno11's 6nm chipset offers significantly better performance and power efficiency.
CPUOcta-core (4x1.6 GHz Cortex-A55 & 4x1.2 GHz Cortex-A55)Octa-core (2x2.6 GHz Cortex-A78 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55)Reno11 has a much more powerful CPU with faster cores, leading to much smoother multitasking and app performance.
GPUIMG8322Mali-G68 MC4Reno11's GPU offers significantly better graphics performance for gaming and demanding applications.
RAM2GB/3GB8GB/12GBReno11 offers substantially more RAM, allowing for smoother multitasking and better handling of demanding applications.
Storage64GB256GB/512GBReno11 offers far more storage for apps, photos, and videos.
Camera
Rear Camera13MP + 2MP50MP + 8MP + 32MPReno11 has a triple camera system with higher resolution sensors and a dedicated telephoto lens for optical zoom.
Front Camera8MP32MPReno11's front camera boasts a much higher resolution for better selfies.
Video Recording1080p@30fps4K@30fps, 1080p@120fpsReno11 offers superior video recording capabilities with higher resolution and frame rate options, including slow-motion.
Battery
Capacity5000 mAh4800 mAhCapacities are similar; real-world battery life depends on other factors like the display and chipset.
Fast Charging10W67WReno11 offers drastically faster charging.

2. Key Differences Analysis

Nokia C22 Advantages:

  • Lower Price: The C22 is significantly more affordable.

Oppo Reno11 Advantages:

  • Superior Performance: Significantly faster processor, GPU, and more RAM.
  • Better Display: AMOLED with higher resolution, refresh rate, and HDR support.
  • More Versatile Camera System: Higher resolution sensors, telephoto lens, and better video recording capabilities.
  • Faster Charging: Significantly faster charging speeds.
  • More Storage: Significantly more storage for apps and media.
  • NFC: Enables contactless payments and other functionalities.

3. User Profiles & Recommendations

Nokia C22:

  • Ideal User: Budget-conscious users who prioritize basic communication and light web browsing.
  • Use Cases: Calling, texting, social media browsing, basic app usage.

Oppo Reno11:

  • Ideal User: Users who demand performance, a high-quality display, a versatile camera system, and fast charging.
  • Use Cases: Mobile gaming, demanding applications, content creation (photography/videography), heavy multitasking.

4. Decision Framework

Key Questions:

  1. What is your budget? The C22 is a budget option, while the Reno11 is a mid-range device.
  2. What are your primary smartphone usage patterns? Basic communication vs. demanding tasks.
  3. Which features are most important to you? Performance, display quality, camera capabilities, battery life, charging speed.

Scenario-Based Recommendations:

  • Tight Budget, Basic Needs: Nokia C22
  • Balanced Performance and Price: Consider other mid-range options, as the price jump to the Reno11 is substantial.
  • Performance and Feature Focused: Oppo Reno11

My Choice: Oppo Reno11

While the Nokia C22 offers a budget-friendly entry point, the Oppo Reno11 provides a significantly better user experience across the board. The superior performance, display, camera, and charging capabilities make it a much more compelling device. The price difference is substantial, but the Reno11 justifies its cost with a vastly improved feature set and overall user experience. For my personal use, I prioritize performance, a good display, and a capable camera, making the Reno11 the clear winner.

Emily Harper
Emily Harper

Technology Insights Specialist

Dedicated technology writer specializing in mobile device analysis and technology communication. Expert at translating complex smartphone features into clear, actionable insights for diverse audiences.

Key Strengths:

  • Mobile technology analysis
  • Digital media communication
  • Technical storytelling
  • User-centric technology insights

Bridging technical complexity with engaging, accessible narratives.