Nokia C22 vs Motorola Edge 50 Neo - Detailed Phone Comparison

Detailed Comparison

Specification
Nokia C22
Nokia C22
Nokia

General

Launch Date February 25, 2023 August 29, 2024
Release Year 2023 2024

Physical

Volume 107.44 cm³ 88.87 cm³
Screen Size to Weight Ratio 3.42 "/g 3.74 "/g
Weight 190 g 171 g
Height 164.6 mm 154.1 mm
Width 75.9 mm 71.2 mm
Thickness 8.6 mm 8.1 mm
Foldable Design No No
Available Colors
  • Midnight Black
  • Sand
  • Nautical Blue
  • Latte
  • Grisaille
  • Poinciana

Display

Screen Size 6.5 " 6.4 "
Resolution 720 x 1600 1256 x 2760
Aspect Ratio 20:9 20:9
Screen-to-Body Ratio 81.6 % 90.8 %
Pixel Density 270 PPI 474 PPI
Refresh Rate N/A 120 Hz
Typical Brightness N/A N/A
HBM Brightness N/A N/A
Peak Brightness N/A 3000 nits

Hardware

Battery Capacity per Screen Area 118.34 mAh/in² 105.22 mAh/in²
Battery Density 46.54 mAh/cm³ 48.5 mAh/cm³
Battery Capacity 5000 mAh 4310 mAh
NFC Support No Yes
Chipset Unisoc SC9863A (28 nm) Mediatek Dimensity 7300 (4 nm)
CPU Octa-core (4x1.6 GHz Cortex-A55 & 4x1.2 GHz Cortex-A55) Octa-core (4x2.5 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55)
GPU IMG8322 Mali-G615 MC2

Connectivity

USB Version 2.0 2.0
OTG Support
DisplayPort
DisplayPort Version N/A N/A
USB Features USB Type-C 2.0 USB Type-C 2.0

Software

Operating System Android Android
Initial OS Version 13 14
Maximum OS Version 19

Comparison Summary

1. Specifications Comparison

FeatureNokia C22Motorola Edge 50 NeoPractical Impact
Design
Dimensions (mm)164.6 x 75.9 x 8.6154.1 x 71.2 x 8.1Edge 50 Neo is slightly smaller and thinner, potentially more pocketable.
Weight (g)190171Edge 50 Neo is noticeably lighter, improving one-handed use.
BuildNot specifiedNot specifiedBuild quality and materials unknown, limiting comparison.
Display
Display TypeIPS LCDLTPO P-OLEDEdge 50 Neo offers superior contrast, deeper blacks, and potentially better power efficiency due to LTPO.
Size (inches)6.56.4Negligible size difference.
Resolution720 x 16001256 x 2760Edge 50 Neo boasts significantly sharper visuals due to much higher resolution.
Refresh RateNot specified120HzEdge 50 Neo will provide a smoother, more responsive user experience with its high refresh rate.
Performance
ChipsetUnisoc SC9863A (28nm)Mediatek Dimensity 7300 (4nm)Edge 50 Neo offers vastly superior performance and efficiency due to a much more modern and powerful chipset.
CPUOcta-core (4x1.6 GHz Cortex-A55 & 4x1.2 GHz Cortex-A55)Octa-core (4x2.5 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55)Edge 50 Neo's CPU will handle demanding tasks and multitasking much more effectively.
RAM2GB/3GB8GB/12GBSignificantly more RAM in the Edge 50 Neo allows for smoother multitasking and better performance with demanding apps.
Camera
Rear Camera13MP Main, 2MP Macro50MP Main, 13MP Wide+Macro, 10MP TelephotoEdge 50 Neo provides more versatile camera options with higher resolution and optical zoom.
Front Camera8MP32MPEdge 50 Neo offers a much higher resolution selfie camera.
Video Recording1080p@30fpsUp to 4K@30fpsEdge 50 Neo supports higher resolution video recording.
Battery
Capacity (mAh)50004310Nokia C22 has a larger battery capacity, potentially leading to longer battery life despite less efficient display and chipset.
Fast Charging10W68WEdge 50 Neo offers significantly faster charging speeds.

2. Key Differences Analysis

Nokia C22 Advantages:

  • Potentially longer battery life: Larger battery capacity might offset the less efficient hardware.
  • Lower price: Positioned in the "low price" range, making it more budget-friendly.

Motorola Edge 50 Neo Advantages:

  • Significantly better performance: Modern chipset, more RAM, and higher CPU clock speeds.
  • Superior display: Higher resolution, OLED technology, 120Hz refresh rate.
  • More versatile camera system: Higher resolution sensors, optical zoom, wider range of shooting modes.
  • Faster charging: 68W fast charging significantly reduces downtime.
  • More modern features: NFC for contactless payments.

3. User Profiles & Recommendations

Nokia C22:

  • Ideal User: Budget-conscious users primarily needing basic communication (calls, texts, light browsing).
  • Use Cases: Simple daily tasks, emergency phone, users prioritizing long battery life over performance.

Motorola Edge 50 Neo:

  • Ideal User: Users seeking a well-rounded smartphone experience with good performance, display, camera, and modern features.
  • Use Cases: Gaming, media consumption, photography, multitasking, users valuing a smooth and responsive user experience.

4. Decision Framework

Key Questions for Buyers:

  1. What is your budget? The Nokia C22 is significantly cheaper.
  2. What are your primary smartphone usage patterns? Basic communication vs. demanding tasks, gaming, photography.
  3. Which features are most important to you? Battery life, performance, display quality, camera versatility.

Scenario-Based Recommendations:

  • Tight Budget, Basic Use: Nokia C22
  • Balanced Performance and Price: Motorola Edge 50 Neo
  • Performance and Feature Focused: Motorola Edge 50 Neo

My Choice: Motorola Edge 50 Neo

While the Nokia C22 offers a lower price and potentially longer battery life, the Motorola Edge 50 Neo provides a significantly superior overall user experience. The performance difference is substantial, and the modern display, versatile camera system, and faster charging are compelling advantages. For a moderate price increase, the Edge 50 Neo offers a much more future-proof and enjoyable smartphone experience. The inclusion of NFC further enhances its practicality for modern users. The Nokia C22's only real advantage is potential battery life, but even that is uncertain given the lack of information on its display refresh rate and overall optimization. The Edge 50 Neo's superior efficiency could potentially close the gap or even surpass the C22 in real-world usage.

Emily Harper
Emily Harper

Technology Insights Specialist

Dedicated technology writer specializing in mobile device analysis and technology communication. Expert at translating complex smartphone features into clear, actionable insights for diverse audiences.

Key Strengths:

  • Mobile technology analysis
  • Digital media communication
  • Technical storytelling
  • User-centric technology insights

Bridging technical complexity with engaging, accessible narratives.