Motorola ThinkPhone vs ZTE Blade V60 Design - Detailed Phone Comparison

Detailed Comparison

Specification

General

Launch Date January 29, 2023 June 1, 2024
Release Year 2023 2024

Physical

Volume 98.06 cm³ 106.33 cm³
Screen Size to Weight Ratio 3.5 "/g 3.33 "/g
Weight 188.5 g 198 g
Height 158.8 mm 164.2 mm
Width 74.4 mm 75.3 mm
Thickness 8.3 mm 8.6 mm
Foldable Design No No
Available Colors
  • Carbon Black
  • Champagne Gold
  • Dark Blue
  • Sunrise Violet

Display

Screen Size 6.6 " 6.6 "
Resolution 1080 x 2400 720 x 1612
Aspect Ratio 20:9 20:9
Screen-to-Body Ratio 89 % 84.6 %
Pixel Density 399 PPI 267 PPI
Refresh Rate 144 Hz 90 Hz
Typical Brightness N/A N/A
HBM Brightness N/A N/A
Peak Brightness N/A N/A

Hardware

Battery Capacity per Screen Area 114.78 mAh/in² 114.78 mAh/in²
Battery Density 50.99 mAh/cm³ 47.02 mAh/cm³
Battery Capacity 5000 mAh 5000 mAh
NFC Support Yes Yes
Chipset Qualcomm SM8475 Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 (4 nm) Unisoc T606 (12 nm)
CPU Octa-core (1x3.19 GHz Cortex-X2 & 3x2.75 GHz Cortex-A710 & 4x1.80 GHz Cortex-A510) Octa-core (2x1.6 GHz Cortex-A75 & 6x1.6 GHz Cortex-A55)
GPU Adreno 730 Mali-G57 MP1

Connectivity

USB Version 3.1 2.0
OTG Support 1
DisplayPort
DisplayPort Version N/A N/A
USB Features USB Type-C 3.1, OTG USB Type-C 2.0

Software

Operating System Android Android
Initial OS Version 13 13
Maximum OS Version

Comparison Summary

1. Specifications Comparison

FeatureMotorola ThinkPhoneZTE Blade V60 DesignPractical Impact
Design
Dimensions (mm)158.8 x 74.4 x 8.3164.2 x 75.3 x 8.6ThinkPhone is slightly smaller and thinner.
Weight (g)188.5198ThinkPhone is noticeably lighter, improving one-handed use.
Build MaterialMissingMissingMaterial affects durability and premium feel; information lacking for both.
Display
Display TypeP-OLEDIPS LCDThinkPhone's P-OLED offers deeper blacks, better contrast, and potentially lower power consumption.
Display Size6.6"6.6"Same size screen.
Resolution1080 x 2400720 x 1612ThinkPhone's significantly higher resolution provides sharper text and images.
Refresh Rate144Hz90HzThinkPhone's higher refresh rate results in smoother animations and scrolling.
Pixel Density (PPI)399267ThinkPhone's higher pixel density leads to a crisper, more detailed image.
Performance
ChipsetSnapdragon 8+ Gen 1Unisoc T606ThinkPhone's flagship Snapdragon chip offers significantly faster performance for demanding tasks and gaming.
CPUOcta-core (1x3.19 GHz Cortex-X2 & 3x2.75 GHz Cortex-A710 & 4x1.80 GHz Cortex-A510)Octa-core (2x1.6 GHz Cortex-A75 & 6x1.6 GHz Cortex-A55)ThinkPhone's CPU boasts much higher clock speeds and a more powerful architecture, translating to significantly faster and smoother performance.
GPUAdreno 730Mali-G57 MP1ThinkPhone's GPU offers significantly better gaming performance and graphics rendering.
RAM8GB4GB/6GBThinkPhone's 8GB RAM allows for better multitasking and smoother performance with multiple apps.
Camera
Main Camera50MP50MPMegapixel count is similar, but sensor quality and image processing (unspecified) will likely differ significantly.
Video RecordingUp to 8K@30fpsUp to 1080p@30fpsThinkPhone allows for much higher resolution video recording.
Battery
Capacity5000mAh5000mAhSame battery capacity.
Fast Charging68W22.5WThinkPhone charges significantly faster, minimizing downtime.

2. Key Differences Analysis

Motorola ThinkPhone Advantages:

  • Significantly superior performance: The Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 outclasses the Unisoc T606 in CPU and GPU performance, leading to a smoother and faster user experience, especially in demanding applications and gaming.
  • Higher quality display: The P-OLED display with a 144Hz refresh rate provides vibrant colors, deep blacks, and incredibly smooth scrolling and animations.
  • Faster charging: 68W fast charging significantly reduces charging time compared to the 22.5W charging of the Blade V60 Design.

ZTE Blade V60 Design Advantages:

  • Lower price: The Blade V60 Design is positioned in the low price range, making it a more budget-friendly option.
  • Color options: Offers multiple color choices, catering to individual preferences.

3. User Profiles & Recommendations

Motorola ThinkPhone Ideal User:

  • Power users who demand top-tier performance for gaming, multitasking, and demanding applications.
  • Users who prioritize a high-quality display with smooth refresh rates.
  • Professionals who need a reliable and responsive device.

ZTE Blade V60 Design Ideal User:

  • Budget-conscious users who prioritize affordability over top-tier performance.
  • Users who primarily use their phones for basic tasks like calling, texting, and web browsing.

4. Decision Framework

Key Questions for Buyers:

  1. What is your budget? The ThinkPhone is a significantly more expensive device.
  2. What is your primary use case for a smartphone? For basic tasks, the Blade V60 Design might suffice. For demanding tasks and gaming, the ThinkPhone is a better choice.
  3. How important is display quality and performance? The ThinkPhone offers a noticeably better visual and performance experience.

My Choice: Motorola ThinkPhone

While the ZTE Blade V60 Design offers an attractive price point, the Motorola ThinkPhone's significant advantages in performance, display quality, and charging speed make it the clear winner for me. The Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, coupled with the 144Hz P-OLED display, ensures a fluid and responsive user experience that is crucial for my usage. The faster charging is also a major benefit, minimizing downtime. While the price difference is substantial, the long-term benefits of a smoother, faster, and more enjoyable user experience justify the investment in the ThinkPhone. The superior display alone makes a huge difference in daily usage, and the performance gap ensures the phone remains capable for a longer period.

Emily Harper
Emily Harper

Technology Insights Specialist

Dedicated technology writer specializing in mobile device analysis and technology communication. Expert at translating complex smartphone features into clear, actionable insights for diverse audiences.

Key Strengths:

  • Mobile technology analysis
  • Digital media communication
  • Technical storytelling
  • User-centric technology insights

Bridging technical complexity with engaging, accessible narratives.