Motorola ThinkPhone vs ZTE Blade A75 4G - Detailed Phone Comparison

Detailed Comparison

Specification

General

Launch Date January 29, 2023 July 1, 2024
Release Year 2023 2024

Physical

Volume 98.06 cm³ 106.97 cm³
Screen Size to Weight Ratio 3.5 "/g 3.49 "/g
Weight 188.5 g 189 g
Height 158.8 mm 164.1 mm
Width 74.4 mm 75.8 mm
Thickness 8.3 mm 8.6 mm
Foldable Design No No
Available Colors
  • Carbon Black
  • Basalt Black
  • Aqua Green
  • Marble White

Display

Screen Size 6.6 " 6.6 "
Resolution 1080 x 2400 720 x 1612
Aspect Ratio 20:9 20:9
Screen-to-Body Ratio 89 % 84.1 %
Pixel Density 399 PPI 267 PPI
Refresh Rate 144 Hz 90 Hz
Typical Brightness N/A N/A
HBM Brightness N/A N/A
Peak Brightness N/A N/A

Hardware

Battery Capacity per Screen Area 114.78 mAh/in² 114.78 mAh/in²
Battery Density 50.99 mAh/cm³ 46.74 mAh/cm³
Battery Capacity 5000 mAh 5000 mAh
NFC Support Yes Yes
Chipset Qualcomm SM8475 Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 (4 nm) Unisoc T606 (12 nm)
CPU Octa-core (1x3.19 GHz Cortex-X2 & 3x2.75 GHz Cortex-A710 & 4x1.80 GHz Cortex-A510) Octa-core (2x1.6 GHz Cortex-A75 & 6x1.6 GHz Cortex-A55)
GPU Adreno 730 Mali-G57 MP1

Connectivity

USB Version 3.1 2.0
OTG Support 1
DisplayPort
DisplayPort Version N/A N/A
USB Features USB Type-C 3.1, OTG USB Type-C 2.0

Software

Operating System Android Android
Initial OS Version 13 13
Maximum OS Version

Comparison Summary

1. Specifications Comparison

FeatureMotorola ThinkPhoneZTE Blade A75 4GPractical Impact
Design
Dimensions (mm)158.8 x 74.4 x 8.3164.1 x 75.8 x 8.6ThinkPhone is slightly smaller and thinner.
Weight (g)188.5189Negligible weight difference.
BuildInformation not availableInformation not availableBuild quality and materials impact durability and feel; this information is missing.
Display
Display TypeP-OLEDIPS LCDThinkPhone's P-OLED offers deeper blacks, richer colors, and potentially better power efficiency.
Display Size6.6"6.6"Same screen size.
Resolution1080 x 2400 (399 ppi)720 x 1612 (267 ppi)ThinkPhone has a significantly sharper display, resulting in clearer text and images.
Refresh Rate144Hz90HzThinkPhone offers smoother scrolling and animations due to the higher refresh rate.
Performance
ChipsetSnapdragon 8+ Gen 1 (4 nm)Unisoc T606 (12 nm)ThinkPhone's processor is significantly more powerful, enabling smoother multitasking, faster app launches, and better gaming performance.
CPUOcta-core (1x3.19 GHz Cortex-X2 & 3x2.75 GHz Cortex-A710 & 4x1.80 GHz Cortex-A510)Octa-core (2x1.6 GHz Cortex-A75 & 6x1.6 GHz Cortex-A55)ThinkPhone boasts a more powerful and efficient CPU architecture.
GPUAdreno 730Mali-G57 MP1ThinkPhone offers superior graphics performance for demanding games and applications.
RAM8GB4GB/8GB8GB RAM in both higher-end models allows for smoother multitasking. The 4GB option in the ZTE might struggle with demanding tasks.
Camera
Main Camera50MP (Omnivision OV50A)50MP (ISOCELL)Sensor model differences could impact image quality; more details on sensor specs are needed for in-depth comparison.
Ultrawide13MP0.3MP (Likely a depth sensor mislabeled)ThinkPhone offers a usable ultrawide camera, while the ZTE's secondary camera is practically useless for general photography.
Video RecordingUp to 8K@30fpsUp to 1080p@30fpsThinkPhone supports much higher video resolution and frame rates.
Battery
Capacity5000 mAh5000 mAhSame battery capacity.
Fast Charging68W22.5WThinkPhone charges significantly faster.

2. Key Differences Analysis

Motorola ThinkPhone Advantages:

  • Significantly better performance: The Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 provides a massive performance advantage for demanding tasks and gaming.
  • Superior display: The P-OLED with 144Hz refresh rate offers a smoother and more visually appealing experience.
  • Faster charging: 68W fast charging significantly reduces downtime.
  • Better camera system: Higher resolution ultrawide and superior video recording capabilities.

ZTE Blade A75 4G Advantages:

  • Lower price: Offers a budget-friendly option for basic smartphone needs.
  • Expandable storage: Information not available in provided data but common in budget phones. This could be advantageous for users needing to store large files.

Trade-offs:

  • Performance vs. Price: The ZTE sacrifices performance for affordability.
  • Display quality vs. Price: The ZTE's lower resolution IPS LCD provides a less impressive visual experience compared to the ThinkPhone's P-OLED.

3. User Profiles & Recommendations

Motorola ThinkPhone: Users who prioritize performance, a smooth and vibrant display, fast charging, and a capable camera system. Ideal for power users, gamers, and content creators.

ZTE Blade A75 4G: Users on a tight budget who primarily need a phone for basic communication, web browsing, and social media. Suitable for light users or as a secondary device.

4. Decision Framework

Key Questions for Buyers:

  1. What is your budget? The ThinkPhone is a mid-range device, while the ZTE is a budget option.
  2. What are your primary phone usage patterns? Demanding tasks and gaming benefit from the ThinkPhone's powerful hardware. Light usage can suffice with the ZTE's capabilities.
  3. How important is display quality and smoothness? The ThinkPhone offers a significantly better visual experience.

My Choice: Motorola ThinkPhone

While the ZTE Blade A75 4G offers an attractive price point, the Motorola ThinkPhone's significant advantages in performance, display, and charging make it a much more compelling device for my needs. I prioritize a smooth user experience, fast application loading, and a high-quality display. The ThinkPhone's superior hardware ensures a future-proof experience for longer, justifying the higher price. The ZTE would likely feel sluggish and frustrating in comparison, especially over time. While budget is a factor, the long-term value and superior user experience of the ThinkPhone make it the clear winner for me.

Emily Harper
Emily Harper

Technology Insights Specialist

Dedicated technology writer specializing in mobile device analysis and technology communication. Expert at translating complex smartphone features into clear, actionable insights for diverse audiences.

Key Strengths:

  • Mobile technology analysis
  • Digital media communication
  • Technical storytelling
  • User-centric technology insights

Bridging technical complexity with engaging, accessible narratives.