Motorola ThinkPhone vs Xiaomi Redmi A3x - Detailed Phone Comparison

Detailed Comparison

Specification

General

Launch Date January 29, 2023 May 24, 2024
Release Year 2023 2024

Physical

Volume 98.06 cm³ 106.65 cm³
Screen Size to Weight Ratio 3.5 "/g 3.48 "/g
Weight 188.5 g 193 g
Height 158.8 mm 168.4 mm
Width 74.4 mm 76.3 mm
Thickness 8.3 mm 8.3 mm
Foldable Design No No
Available Colors
  • Carbon Black
  • Midnight Black
  • Olive Green
  • Moonlight White (Starry White)
  • Aurora Green (Ocean Green)

Display

Screen Size 6.6 " 6.71 "
Resolution 1080 x 2400 720 x 1650
Aspect Ratio 20:9 21:9
Screen-to-Body Ratio 89 % 82.9 %
Pixel Density 399 PPI 268 PPI
Refresh Rate 144 Hz 90 Hz
Typical Brightness N/A 500 nits
HBM Brightness N/A N/A
Peak Brightness N/A N/A

Hardware

Battery Capacity per Screen Area 114.78 mAh/in² 111.05 mAh/in²
Battery Density 50.99 mAh/cm³ 46.88 mAh/cm³
Battery Capacity 5000 mAh 5000 mAh
NFC Support Yes No
Chipset Qualcomm SM8475 Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 (4 nm) Unisoc T603 (22 nm)
CPU Octa-core (1x3.19 GHz Cortex-X2 & 3x2.75 GHz Cortex-A710 & 4x1.80 GHz Cortex-A510) Octa-core 1.8 GHz
GPU Adreno 730 8

Connectivity

USB Version 3.1 N/A
OTG Support 1
DisplayPort
DisplayPort Version N/A N/A
USB Features USB Type-C 3.1, OTG USB Type-C

Software

Operating System Android Android
Initial OS Version 13 14
Maximum OS Version 16

Comparison Summary

1. Specifications Comparison

FeatureMotorola ThinkPhoneXiaomi Redmi A3xPractical Impact
Design
Dimensions (mm)158.8 x 74.4 x 8.3168.4 x 76.3 x 8.3ThinkPhone is noticeably smaller and potentially easier to handle one-handed.
Weight (g)188.5193Negligible weight difference in practical use.
BuildBuild materials and durability are unknown and cannot be compared.
Display
Display TypeP-OLEDIPS LCDThinkPhone's P-OLED offers deeper blacks, richer colors, and potentially better power efficiency.
Size (inches)6.66.71Redmi A3x has a slightly larger screen.
Resolution1080 x 2400720 x 1650ThinkPhone has a significantly sharper display, resulting in clearer text and images. Redmi A3x's lower resolution will appear pixelated.
Refresh Rate (Hz)14490ThinkPhone's 144Hz refresh rate delivers smoother animations and scrolling compared to the 90Hz on the Redmi A3x.
Performance
ChipsetSnapdragon 8+ Gen 1 (4nm)Unisoc T603 (22nm)ThinkPhone boasts a vastly more powerful processor, enabling significantly faster performance in demanding tasks, multitasking, and gaming.
CPUOcta-core (1x3.19 GHz Cortex-X2 & 3x2.75 GHz Cortex-A710 & 4x1.80 GHz Cortex-A510)Octa-core 1.8 GHzThinkPhone's CPU architecture and higher clock speeds offer superior performance compared to the Redmi A3x.
GPUAdreno 730Mali-G57 MP1ThinkPhone's GPU is considerably more powerful, enabling smoother gaming and graphics-intensive applications.
RAM8GB4GB (in the compared variant)ThinkPhone's larger RAM allows for more efficient multitasking and smoother performance with multiple open apps.
Camera
Rear Camera50MP Main + 13MP Wide/Macro + 2MP Depth8MP Main + 0.1MP (unknown purpose)ThinkPhone has a significantly better camera setup with a higher resolution main sensor, wide-angle capabilities, and dedicated macro lens. The secondary 0.1MP camera on the Redmi A3x is unlikely to provide any meaningful functionality.
Video RecordingUp to 8K@30fpsUp to 1080p@30fpsThinkPhone can record much higher resolution video with more detail.
Battery
Capacity (mAh)50005000Both phones have the same battery capacity.
Fast Charging68W10WThinkPhone charges significantly faster, minimizing downtime.

2. Key Differences Analysis

Motorola ThinkPhone Advantages:

  • Significantly superior performance: The Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 chipset and higher RAM offer a vastly smoother and more responsive user experience.
  • Much better display: The P-OLED with 144Hz provides vibrant colors, deep blacks, and incredibly smooth scrolling.
  • Higher quality camera system: The 50MP main sensor, wide-angle lens, and macro capabilities offer greater versatility and detail.
  • Faster charging: 68W fast charging dramatically reduces charging time.

Xiaomi Redmi A3x Advantages:

  • Lower price: The Redmi A3x is significantly cheaper, making it accessible to budget-conscious buyers.
  • Slightly larger screen: The 6.71-inch screen offers marginally more screen real estate. Potentially later software updates because of newer release date.

3. User Profiles & Recommendations

Motorola ThinkPhone: Ideal for users who prioritize performance, a high-quality display, a good camera, and fast charging. Suitable for demanding tasks like gaming, content creation, and multitasking.

Xiaomi Redmi A3x: Best suited for users on a tight budget who primarily use their phones for basic tasks like calling, texting, web browsing, and social media.

4. Decision Framework

Key Questions for Buyers:

  1. What is your budget? The Redmi A3x is significantly more affordable.
  2. What are your primary phone usage patterns? The ThinkPhone excels in demanding tasks, while the Redmi A3x is sufficient for basic use.
  3. Which features are most important to you? Consider prioritizing performance, display quality, camera capabilities, or battery life.

My Choice: Motorola ThinkPhone

While the Xiaomi Redmi A3x is a budget-friendly option, the Motorola ThinkPhone offers a significantly better overall user experience. The superior performance, stunning display, versatile camera, and fast charging make it a worthwhile investment. The price difference is substantial, but the ThinkPhone provides a significant leap in quality and capabilities that would greatly enhance my daily usage. The Redmi A3x's extremely low resolution and dated processor would be frustrating for anything beyond the most basic tasks. Even for a budget phone, there are better options.

Emily Harper
Emily Harper

Technology Insights Specialist

Dedicated technology writer specializing in mobile device analysis and technology communication. Expert at translating complex smartphone features into clear, actionable insights for diverse audiences.

Key Strengths:

  • Mobile technology analysis
  • Digital media communication
  • Technical storytelling
  • User-centric technology insights

Bridging technical complexity with engaging, accessible narratives.