Motorola ThinkPhone vs Xiaomi Poco X6 Pro - Detailed Phone Comparison

Detailed Comparison

Specification

General

Launch Date January 29, 2023 January 12, 2024
Release Year 2023 2024

Physical

Volume 98.06 cm³ 98.98 cm³
Screen Size to Weight Ratio 3.5 "/g 3.59 "/g
Weight 188.5 g 186 g
Height 158.8 mm 160.5 mm
Width 74.4 mm 74.3 mm
Thickness 8.3 mm 8.3 mm
Foldable Design No No
Available Colors
  • Carbon Black
  • Black
  • Yellow
  • Gray

Display

Screen Size 6.6 " 6.67 "
Resolution 1080 x 2400 1220 x 2712
Aspect Ratio 20:9 20:9
Screen-to-Body Ratio 89 % 90.1 %
Pixel Density 399 PPI 446 PPI
Refresh Rate 144 Hz 120 Hz
Typical Brightness N/A 500 nits
HBM Brightness N/A 1200 nits
Peak Brightness N/A 1800 nits

Hardware

Battery Capacity per Screen Area 114.78 mAh/in² 112.39 mAh/in²
Battery Density 50.99 mAh/cm³ 50.52 mAh/cm³
Battery Capacity 5000 mAh 5000 mAh
NFC Support Yes Yes
Chipset Qualcomm SM8475 Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 (4 nm) Mediatek Dimensity 8300 Ultra (4 nm)
CPU Octa-core (1x3.19 GHz Cortex-X2 & 3x2.75 GHz Cortex-A710 & 4x1.80 GHz Cortex-A510) Octa-core (1x3.35 GHz Cortex-A715 & 3x3.20 GHz Cortex-A715 & 4x2.20 GHz Cortex-A510)
GPU Adreno 730 Mali G615-MC6

Connectivity

USB Version 3.1 2.0
OTG Support 1 1
DisplayPort
DisplayPort Version N/A N/A
USB Features USB Type-C 3.1, OTG USB Type-C 2.0, OTG

Software

Operating System Android Android
Initial OS Version 13 14
Maximum OS Version 17

Comparison Summary

1. Specifications Comparison

FeatureMotorola ThinkPhoneXiaomi Poco X6 ProPractical Impact
Design
Dimensions (mm)158.8 x 74.4 x 8.3160.5 x 74.3 x 8.3Virtually identical in size; negligible difference in hand feel.
Weight (g)188.5186Negligible weight difference; both feel substantial but not overly heavy.
Build MaterialsNot specifiedNot specifiedLack of information prevents comparison.
Display
Display TypeP-OLEDAMOLEDBoth offer excellent contrast and vibrant colors. AMOLED generally has slightly better color accuracy, while P-OLED can be more power efficient.
Display Size (inches)6.66.67Very slight difference in size; Poco X6 Pro offers marginally more screen real estate.
Resolution1080 x 24001220 x 2712Poco X6 Pro has a sharper display with higher pixel density, resulting in crisper text and images.
Refresh Rate (Hz)144120ThinkPhone provides smoother scrolling and animations due to the higher refresh rate.
Peak Brightness (nits)12001800Poco X6 Pro can get significantly brighter, improving outdoor visibility.
Performance
ChipsetSnapdragon 8+ Gen 1Dimensity 8300 UltraBoth are high-performance chipsets, but benchmarks would be needed to determine real-world differences.
CPUOcta-core (1x3.19 GHz Cortex-X2 & 3x2.75 GHz Cortex-A710 & 4x1.80 GHz Cortex-A510)Octa-core (1x3.35 GHz Cortex-A715 & 3x3.20 GHz Cortex-A715 & 4x2.20 GHz Cortex-A510)Clock speeds suggest potential performance advantage for Poco X6 Pro in some tasks, but overall performance depends on optimization.
GPUAdreno 730Mali G615-MC6Adreno 730 generally offers better gaming performance.
RAM (GB)88/12Poco X6 Pro offers a 12GB RAM option, enabling better multitasking and potentially smoother performance with demanding apps.
Camera
Main Camera (MP)5064Poco X6 Pro boasts higher resolution, but image quality depends on sensor size, processing, and other factors.
Ultrawide (MP)138ThinkPhone has a higher resolution ultrawide.
Video RecordingUp to 8K @ 30fpsUp to 4K @ 30fpsThinkPhone supports higher resolution video recording.
Battery
Capacity (mAh)50005000Identical battery capacity.
Fast Charging (W)6867Virtually identical fast charging speeds; minimal difference in charging times.

2. Key Differences Analysis

Motorola ThinkPhone Advantages:

  • Smoother Display: 144Hz refresh rate provides a more fluid user experience.
  • Potentially Better GPU: Adreno 730 generally offers a superior gaming experience.
  • Higher Resolution Video Recording: Capable of recording 8K video.

Xiaomi Poco X6 Pro Advantages:

  • Sharper Display: Higher resolution and pixel density lead to clearer visuals.
  • Brighter Display: Better visibility in direct sunlight.
  • More RAM: 12GB option available for enhanced multitasking.
  • Lower Price: Generally more affordable, especially considering the higher storage/RAM configurations available.
  • Longer Software Support: Guaranteed updates to Android 17.

Trade-offs:

  • ThinkPhone's higher refresh rate might consume more battery than Poco X6 Pro's 120Hz display.
  • Poco X6 Pro's higher resolution might also impact battery life compared to the ThinkPhone.

3. User Profiles & Recommendations

Motorola ThinkPhone: Users prioritizing a smooth display experience, potentially for gaming, and who value higher resolution video recording.

Xiaomi Poco X6 Pro: Users seeking the best value, a sharp and bright display, and excellent multitasking capabilities. Good for general users, content consumers, and light gamers.

4. Decision Framework

Key Questions for Buyers:

  1. How important is display smoothness? Prioritize ThinkPhone if a high refresh rate is crucial.
  2. What's your budget? Poco X6 Pro offers better value for the price.
  3. How important is long-term software support? Poco X6 Pro has a longer update guarantee.

My Choice: Xiaomi Poco X6 Pro

While the Motorola ThinkPhone offers a smoother display and 8K video recording, the Xiaomi Poco X6 Pro provides a more compelling overall package for my needs. The sharper, brighter display, larger RAM option, and significantly lower price are major advantages. The longer software support commitment also ensures the device remains up-to-date for a longer period. While I appreciate a high refresh rate, the difference between 120Hz and 144Hz is less noticeable than the difference in resolution and brightness. I am not a heavy gamer or someone who needs 8K video recording, making the Poco X6 Pro a more practical and valuable choice for me.

Emily Harper
Emily Harper

Technology Insights Specialist

Dedicated technology writer specializing in mobile device analysis and technology communication. Expert at translating complex smartphone features into clear, actionable insights for diverse audiences.

Key Strengths:

  • Mobile technology analysis
  • Digital media communication
  • Technical storytelling
  • User-centric technology insights

Bridging technical complexity with engaging, accessible narratives.