Motorola ThinkPhone vs vivo X100 - Detailed Phone Comparison

Detailed Comparison

Specification
vivo X100
vivo X100
Vivo

General

Launch Date January 29, 2023 November 21, 2023
Release Year 2023 2023

Physical

Volume 98.06 cm³ 104.89 cm³
Screen Size to Weight Ratio 3.5 "/g 3.36 "/g
Weight 188.5 g 202 g
Height 158.8 mm 164.1 mm
Width 74.4 mm 75.2 mm
Thickness 8.3 mm 8.5 mm
Foldable Design No No
Available Colors
  • Carbon Black
  • White
  • Orange
  • Startrail Blue
  • Asteroid Black

Display

Screen Size 6.6 " 6.78 "
Resolution 1080 x 2400 1260 x 2800
Aspect Ratio 20:9 20:9
Screen-to-Body Ratio 89 % 89.9 %
Pixel Density 399 PPI 452 PPI
Refresh Rate 144 Hz 120 Hz
Typical Brightness N/A N/A
HBM Brightness N/A N/A
Peak Brightness N/A 3000 nits

Hardware

Battery Capacity per Screen Area 114.78 mAh/in² 108.77 mAh/in²
Battery Density 50.99 mAh/cm³ 47.67 mAh/cm³
Battery Capacity 5000 mAh 5000 mAh
NFC Support Yes Yes
Chipset Qualcomm SM8475 Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 (4 nm) Mediatek Dimensity 9300 (4 nm)
CPU Octa-core (1x3.19 GHz Cortex-X2 & 3x2.75 GHz Cortex-A710 & 4x1.80 GHz Cortex-A510) Octa-core (1x3.25 GHz Cortex-X4 & 3x2.85 GHz Cortex-X4 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A720)
GPU Adreno 730 Immortalis-G720 MC12

Connectivity

USB Version 3.1 2.0
OTG Support 1 1
DisplayPort
DisplayPort Version N/A N/A
USB Features USB Type-C 3.1, OTG USB Type-C 2.0, OTG

Software

Operating System Android Android
Initial OS Version 13 14
Maximum OS Version

Comparison Summary

1. Specifications Comparison

FeatureMotorola ThinkPhonevivo X100Practical Impact
Design
Dimensions (mm)158.8 x 74.4 x 8.3164.1 x 75.2 x 8.5The vivo X100 is slightly larger and thicker.
Weight (g)188.5202The ThinkPhone is noticeably lighter, improving one-handed use.
BuildBuild materials not specified, preventing comparison.
Display
Size (inches)6.66.78The vivo X100 offers a slightly larger screen for more immersive content consumption.
Resolution1080 x 24001260 x 2800The vivo X100 has a higher resolution, resulting in sharper text and images.
Panel TypeP-OLEDLTPO AMOLEDBoth offer excellent contrast and colors, but the X100's LTPO panel allows for a variable refresh rate, potentially saving battery.
Refresh Rate (Hz)144120The ThinkPhone has a higher refresh rate, potentially leading to smoother animations and scrolling, though the difference might not be noticeable for all users.
Performance
ChipsetSnapdragon 8+ Gen 1Dimensity 9300Both are powerful chips, but benchmarks would be needed for definitive performance comparison. The Dimensity 9300 is newer.
CPUOcta-core (1x3.19 GHz X2 & 3x2.75 GHz A710 & 4x1.80 GHz A510)Octa-core (1x3.25 GHz X4 & 3x2.85 GHz X4 & 4x2.0 GHz A720)CPU architectures differ. Real-world performance comparison requires benchmarking.
GPUAdreno 730Immortalis-G720 MC12Different GPUs; gaming performance comparison requires benchmarks.
RAM (GB)812/16The vivo X100 offers significantly more RAM, enabling better multitasking and smoother performance with demanding apps.
Camera
Main Camera (MP)5050Megapixel count is identical, but sensor size and aperture differ (ThinkPhone: 1/1.55", f/1.8; X100: 1/1.31", f/1.57). The X100's larger sensor and wider aperture likely result in better low-light performance.
Other Cameras13MP Wide+Macro, 2MP Depth50MP Wide, 64MP TelephotoThe X100 offers a more versatile camera system with a dedicated telephoto lens.
VideoUp to 8K@30fpsUnspecifiedThe ThinkPhone's video capabilities are clearly defined, while the X100's are missing, preventing comparison.
Battery
Capacity (mAh)50005000Identical battery capacity.
Fast Charging (W)68120The vivo X100 supports significantly faster charging.

2. Key Differences Analysis

Motorola ThinkPhone Advantages:

  • Lighter and potentially more compact: Easier for one-handed use and portability.
  • Higher refresh rate display: Smoother scrolling and animations.
  • More durable design (implied): ThinkPhone branding suggests a focus on ruggedness, although specifics aren't provided.

vivo X100 Advantages:

  • Higher resolution display: Sharper visuals and more screen real estate.
  • More RAM: Improved multitasking and performance.
  • More versatile camera system: Dedicated telephoto lens and potentially better low-light performance due to larger main sensor.
  • Significantly faster charging: Less downtime.
  • Newer OS: Android 14 offers potential features and optimizations not present in Android 13.

3. User Profiles & Recommendations

Motorola ThinkPhone: Users prioritizing durability, a compact form factor, and a smooth display. Suitable for business professionals and those seeking a reliable device for everyday use.

vivo X100: Users who value a premium multimedia experience, photography versatility, and fast charging. Ideal for content consumption, gaming, and mobile photography enthusiasts.

4. Decision Framework

Key Questions for Buyers:

  1. What is your budget and storage needs? Pricing details are incomplete but both are in the medium range; consider storage options and associated costs.
  2. What are your primary use cases (photography, gaming, productivity)?
  3. Do you prioritize portability and durability or screen size and multimedia performance?

My Choice: vivo X100

While the ThinkPhone's lighter weight and potentially more durable build are appealing, the vivo X100 offers a more compelling overall package for my needs. The larger, higher-resolution display, coupled with the more powerful chipset, greater RAM, more versatile camera system, and significantly faster charging, makes it a more future-proof and feature-rich device. The newer Android version also suggests longer software support. While lacking specific video capabilities and build information for the X100 limits a full comparison, the available data suggests its superiority for a broader range of users. I prioritize performance, camera quality, and a great display, making the X100 the better choice for me.

Emily Harper
Emily Harper

Technology Insights Specialist

Dedicated technology writer specializing in mobile device analysis and technology communication. Expert at translating complex smartphone features into clear, actionable insights for diverse audiences.

Key Strengths:

  • Mobile technology analysis
  • Digital media communication
  • Technical storytelling
  • User-centric technology insights

Bridging technical complexity with engaging, accessible narratives.