Motorola ThinkPhone vs Realme C65 - Detailed Phone Comparison

Detailed Comparison

Specification
Realme C65
Realme C65
Realme

General

Launch Date January 29, 2023 April 1, 2024
Release Year 2023 2024

Physical

Volume 98.06 cm³ 95.2 cm³
Screen Size to Weight Ratio 3.5 "/g 3.61 "/g
Weight 188.5 g 185 g
Height 158.8 mm 164.6 mm
Width 74.4 mm 76.1 mm
Thickness 8.3 mm 7.6 mm
Foldable Design No No
Available Colors
  • Carbon Black
  • Purple Nebula
  • Black Milky Way

Display

Screen Size 6.6 " 6.67 "
Resolution 1080 x 2400 720 x 1604
Aspect Ratio 20:9 20:9
Screen-to-Body Ratio 89 % 85.6 %
Pixel Density 399 PPI 264 PPI
Refresh Rate 144 Hz 90 Hz
Typical Brightness N/A 500 nits
HBM Brightness N/A 625 nits
Peak Brightness N/A N/A

Hardware

Battery Capacity per Screen Area 114.78 mAh/in² 112.39 mAh/in²
Battery Density 50.99 mAh/cm³ 52.52 mAh/cm³
Battery Capacity 5000 mAh 5000 mAh
NFC Support Yes Yes
Chipset Qualcomm SM8475 Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 (4 nm) Mediatek Helio G85 (12 nm)
CPU Octa-core (1x3.19 GHz Cortex-X2 & 3x2.75 GHz Cortex-A710 & 4x1.80 GHz Cortex-A510) Octa-core (2x2.0 GHz Cortex-A75 & 6x1.8 GHz Cortex-A55)
GPU Adreno 730 Mali-G52 MC2

Connectivity

USB Version 3.1 2.0
OTG Support 1
DisplayPort
DisplayPort Version N/A N/A
USB Features USB Type-C 3.1, OTG USB Type-C 2.0

Software

Operating System Android Android
Initial OS Version 13 14
Maximum OS Version

Comparison Summary

1. Specifications Comparison

FeatureMotorola ThinkPhoneRealme C65Practical Impact
Design
Dimensions (mm)158.8 x 74.4 x 8.3164.6 x 76.1 x 7.6ThinkPhone is slightly smaller and thinner.
Weight (g)188.5185Negligible weight difference in practical use.
BuildInformation not availableInformation not availableBuild quality and materials impact durability and premium feel; cannot be assessed here.
Display
Display TypeP-OLEDIPS LCDThinkPhone's P-OLED offers deeper blacks, richer colors, and potentially better power efficiency. C65's IPS LCD might offer better outdoor visibility.
Display Size (inches)6.66.67Negligible size difference.
Resolution1080 x 2400720 x 1604ThinkPhone has a significantly sharper display (399 ppi vs 264 ppi), resulting in clearer text and images.
Refresh Rate (Hz)14490ThinkPhone's 144Hz refresh rate provides a smoother, more responsive user experience, especially noticeable in gaming and scrolling.
Performance
ChipsetSnapdragon 8+ Gen 1 (4nm)Helio G85 (12nm)ThinkPhone's Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 offers significantly better performance and efficiency for demanding tasks and gaming.
CPUOcta-core (1x3.19 GHz Cortex-X2 & 3x2.75 GHz Cortex-A710 & 4x1.80 GHz Cortex-A510)Octa-core (2x2.0 GHz Cortex-A75 & 6x1.8 GHz Cortex-A55)ThinkPhone's CPU is considerably more powerful, leading to faster app loading, smoother multitasking, and better gaming performance.
GPUAdreno 730Mali-G52 MC2ThinkPhone's GPU provides a far superior gaming and graphics rendering experience.
RAM (GB)86/8 (Variant dependent)ThinkPhone's 8GB RAM ensures smooth multitasking. C65 offers variants, impacting performance. More RAM benefits heavy users.
Camera
Main Camera (MP)5050Megapixel count doesn't tell the whole story; sensor size and image processing matter more. Details like sensor size are incomplete for the C65.
Camera FeaturesOIS, 8K@30fps video recordingDigital image stabilization, 1080p@30fps video recordingThinkPhone offers superior camera features with optical image stabilization for steadier videos and higher resolution video recording.
Battery
Capacity (mAh)50005000Similar battery capacity suggests comparable battery life, though actual usage will depend on other factors like display and chipset efficiency.
Fast Charging68W45WThinkPhone charges significantly faster.

2. Key Differences Analysis

Motorola ThinkPhone Advantages:

  • Superior Performance: Significantly faster processor, GPU, and higher refresh rate display for a smooth and responsive experience.
  • Better Display: Higher resolution and refresh rate P-OLED display for richer visuals and smoother interactions.
  • Faster Charging: 68W fast charging for quicker top-ups.
  • More Advanced Camera Features: Optical Image Stabilization and 8K video recording.

Realme C65 Advantages:

  • Potentially Lower Price: Based on the limited pricing data, the Realme C65 is likely much cheaper.

3. User Profiles & Recommendations

Motorola ThinkPhone: Users who prioritize performance, a premium display, and fast charging. Suitable for demanding tasks, gaming, and content consumption.

Realme C65: Budget-conscious users who prioritize basic functionality and long battery life. Best for casual usage like calling, texting, and social media browsing.

4. Decision Framework

Key Questions for Buyers:

  1. What is your budget? The ThinkPhone is a more premium, and thus likely more expensive device.
  2. What is your primary use case? For demanding tasks and gaming, the ThinkPhone is vastly superior. For basic use, the C65 might suffice.
  3. How important is display quality and smoothness? The ThinkPhone's P-OLED with a 144Hz refresh rate provides a significant advantage in this area.

My Choice: Motorola ThinkPhone

While price is a major factor, the Motorola ThinkPhone offers a significantly better overall experience due to its superior performance, display, and faster charging. The Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 is a powerful and efficient chip that provides a smooth and responsive user experience. The 144Hz P-OLED display offers stunning visuals and smooth scrolling, which is crucial for gaming and everyday use. Even though the Realme C65 offers a larger display and comparable battery capacity, the substantial difference in performance and overall quality makes the ThinkPhone the clear winner for me. I prioritize a smooth and responsive experience over slight size differences or marginal cost savings. The long-term benefits of a more powerful device outweigh the initial price difference.

Emily Harper
Emily Harper

Technology Insights Specialist

Dedicated technology writer specializing in mobile device analysis and technology communication. Expert at translating complex smartphone features into clear, actionable insights for diverse audiences.

Key Strengths:

  • Mobile technology analysis
  • Digital media communication
  • Technical storytelling
  • User-centric technology insights

Bridging technical complexity with engaging, accessible narratives.